pretty much yeah based on our site model anyways...
They can actually.
They can move in 100 directions, one at a time, but they cannot move in 100 directions at the same time
Why would they be limited to being able to move one direction at a time?
Consider the distinction between an object propelling itself, and it being displaced by another object.
An object with a single direction of motion extends in one direction in that space. More precisely, it cannot extend in more than one direction at the same time
Even in that distinction, lets say a one-dimensional object can only move in single forward motion, it should still be able to slightly change it's directory, kind of like a snake moving forward, and if it can't change its directory, the straight line it's traveling can still be displaced in multiple directions. You can move in a straight line in 3 dimensions, and your coordinates in all three dimensions can still shift.
I don't think a 0-D point can "move" in the way you're describing. A point is an exact location in space and movement is an act of changing location or position. Other decidedly 0-D objects should still technically be able to move from point-to-point though.
It can extend in one direction of space, but that doesn't mean it can only move in one direction. it's the property of space that determines the degrees of movement, not property of the object.
Yes, as you can see from here, it runs along a single direction. And this action depends fundamentally on the subject itself. Don't misunderstand, I'm not talking about its move, I'm talking about the axis along which the subject extends. It depends on the subject itself rather than space.
Oh, okay. Replace point with object and my point stands.
Agreed, I don't think your reasoning was wrong I just don't think "point" was the right word to use.
I thought I did that, though. I even said at the end "Other decidedly 0-D objects should still technically be able to move from point-to-point though."
Does it? I thought that Ultima was pretty against even using "omnipotence" statements for tiering, unless it has a hell of a lot of context behind it. Like I think "logical omnipotence" is Tier 0, but that has harsh standards.
The "omnipotence" here isn't necessarily the ability to do anything but it's moreso an existence that is "all powerful", above and lacking all qualities we could assign something. I dunno how to explain it well but basically concepts of monad and ultimate/absolute reality that have no contradictions.
why?
Gu Chensa assimilated with beyond deathless realm.
Beyond deathless realm cannot be ascended via cultivation, even with infinite amount of lifetime.
And then there another novels from the Author.
Because bullshit duh, and he is actually chosen by it?
What...?
He is chosen to become one with "it" by "it".
It is less you reach tier 0 by being omnipotent and moreso that a tier 0 being by necessity must be omnipotent.
Oh don't be so cruel. We still need to keep their graces so I'm not given all their work.
Yeah. When you hit Tier 0, the distinction between "character" and "place" really just comes down to whether the thing is an intelligence of sorts or if it's just mindless and impersonal.
In theory could a character some how scale to the Tier 0 cosmology as a smurf for 1 or a few hax?
Gimme some time to think of possible examples lol
(It's about Saint Seiya isn't it.)
Nah it isn't lol
...So do you have an ideas on which characters would lose their current Tier 0 ratings? Who would some of these people be?
