IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,225
- 3,933
Using Saitama is also poor form.You’re right, that’s bad wank. Now, Saitama on the other hand…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Using Saitama is also poor form.You’re right, that’s bad wank. Now, Saitama on the other hand…
sassy the sasquatch will neg the 1-A fodders
It means that you did not handle it correctly, you need to handle it again. Doing this will cause cosmology collapse in all series, so everyone will start using csap.All of this has already been addressed.
Isn’t CSAP’s system very similar to what Ultima is arguing for the 1-A tiers?It means that you did not handle it correctly, you need to handle it again. Doing this will cause cosmology collapse in all series, so everyone will start using csap.
ye csap 1-A is beyond the concept of dimensionsIsn’t CSAP’s system very similar to what Ultima is arguing for the 1-A tiers?
Unless you have something coherent to say, don't.It means that you did not handle it correctly, you need to handle it again. Doing this will cause cosmology collapse in all series, so everyone will start using csap.
Sorta, R>F as far as I know on CSAP isn't t really treated the same as what's in Ultima's proposal which is ironic that people are saying it's exactly like CSAP when R>F there practically just treated as a n+1.ye csap 1-A is beyond the concept of dimensions
Ultimas criteria for R>F that he outlines along with the other general requirements he’s listed if sar closer yo CSAPs 1-A than current VBW 1-A.Sorta, R>F as far as I know on CSAP isn't t really treated the same as what's in Ultima's proposal which is ironic that people are saying it's exactly like CSAP when R>F there practically just treated as a n+1.
Yeah, the premise is the same, but its explained differentlyIsn’t CSAP’s system very similar to what Ultima is arguing for the 1-A tiers?
But it doesn’t collapse that many cosmology’s a lot of 1-A versus already use r>f and stuffIt means that you did not handle it correctly, you need to handle it again. Doing this will cause cosmology collapse in all series, so everyone will start using csap.
You must be a bit of an idiot too. If you're not going to give a logical answer, don't make a useless comment.Unless you have something coherent to say, don't.
Thanks to the hierarchical layers in cosmology, every cosmology can get 1a from r>f, and some can get higher if there is a r>f context just because they are outside the concept of geometric dimension? And tell me the cosmology that takes 1a with just one r>f, hurry up, my friend.But it doesn’t collapse that many cosmology’s a lot of 1-A versus already use r>f and stuff
Mate, chill out a bit; there's no need to be rude.You must be a bit of an idiot too. If you're not going to give a logical answer, don't make a useless comment.
1. I don’t see how any of that is a problem “my friend”, introducing a concept of a dimension to something that can’t seems valid to meThanks to the hierarchical layers in cosmology, every cosmology can get 1a from r>f, and some can get higher if there is a r>f context just because they are outside the concept of geometric dimension? And tell me the cosmology that takes 1a with just one r>f, hurry up, my friend.
Doesn’t scp have r>f tho?Okay, for real now, knock it right off. Nothing gives anyone the right to taunt IdiosyncraticLawyer for his deadpan approach to this thread. Even before, I’m pretty sure some of you were taunting him relentlessly about how SCP would be downgraded. I’ll take this straight to RvR personally if it persists. Just calm down ffs.
I think the scp dowgrade thing had to do with them losing all of their tier 0's.Doesn’t scp have r>f tho?
It’s scp, they’ll find something to make tier 0 irrelevantI think the scp dowgrade had to do with them losing all of their tier 0's.
Calling a moderator an "idiot" and "useless" for pointing out incoherently worded comments is going to get you in trouble if you keep it up.You must be a bit of an idiot too. If you're not going to give a logical answer, don't make a useless comment.
Something something, I agree to an extent, but I gotta change some of the requirementsBack on topic, DT typed out this Bible which I'm waiting on someone to at least give their TLDR on it cause it's a lot
Dude, there is no inconsistency here, I just want you to stop with the nonsense you are doing, besides, I am good at everything, lmao.Calling a moderator an "idiot" and "useless" for pointing out incoherently worded comments is going to get you in trouble if you keep it up.
Okay, now your mocking has crossed a line. I will be reporting you.Dude, there is no inconsistency here, I just want you to stop with the nonsense you are doing, besides, I am good at everything, lmao.
The TLDR is that he went on a long rant about how much he hates orphans and loves burning crops and kicking puppies. Kinda weird nglBack on topic, DT typed out this Bible which I'm waiting on someone to at least give their TLDR on it cause it's a lot
Friend, I know all the cosmologies you wrote and they consist of layered hierarchical r>f's, you can say that each cosmology has a compound hierarchy and the r>f's taken in the compound hierarchies are also layered, so here "1a cannot be taken with just a single r>f" in the same way. It is also valid for other cosmologies and also for the higher layers than the current h1a super flow in the Marvel fiction, for example, for the far shore, it does not exceed the super flow with r>f. I recommend you write knowing these.1. I don’t see how any of that is a problem “my friend”, introducing a concept of a dimension to something that can’t seems valid to me
2. Marvel, scp, narnia
I am not reading all of that so I will take your word for it. Truly sad that such a reputable member of the community DT would turn to such tactics to delay the revision...The TLDR is that he went on a long rant about how much he hates orphans and loves burning crops and kicking puppies. Kinda weird ngl
Incorrect, back to Tier Low 11-C.goku negs math fodders
SCP has enough R>f for everything below Tier 0 to stay the same, but under Ultima's new system, all of their Tier 0 characters would be downgraded to High 1-A, as nothing in the verse is a true Monad.Doesn’t scp have r>f tho?
Enough, already.Incorrect, back to Tier Low 11-C.
I hardly see that as enough to mock anyone over, they just jealous SCP is still stronger than 90% of the wikiSCP has enough R>f for everything below Tier 0 to stay the same, but under Ultima's new system, all of their Tier 0 characters would be downgraded to High 1-A, as nothing in the verse is a true Monad.
"Friend" what tf are you talking about, is English your first language because I genuinely cannot understand you or your point, no offenceFriend, I know all the cosmologies you wrote and they consist of layered hierarchical r>f's, you can say that each cosmology has a compound hierarchy and the r>f's taken in the compound hierarchies are also layered, so here "1a cannot be taken with just a single r>f" in the same way. It is also valid for other cosmologies and also for the higher layers than the current h1a super flow in the Marvel fiction, for example, for the far shore, it does not exceed the super flow with r>f. I recommend you write knowing these.
No dude, English is not my native language and I am a Turk. Moreover, what I wrote there is about superflow and far shore."Friend" what tf are you talking about, is English your first language because I genuinely cannot understand you or your point, no offence
No need to be so hostile."Friend" what tf are you talking about, is English your first language because I genuinely cannot understand you or your point, no offence
Okay, but what has the superflow and far shore got to do with the tiering system revision?No dude, English is not my native language and I am a Turk. Moreover, what I wrote there is about superflow and far shore.
I wasn't trying to, I only realized that English wasn't his first language after I wrote the first part and forgot to edit the beginningNo need to be so hostile.
It really do be like thatThe TLDR is that he went on a long rant about how much he hates orphans and loves burning crops and kicking puppies. Kinda weird ngl
Why was he bannedThis guy's been banned now.