• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The animators for Phineas and Ferb

Messages
1,348
Reaction score
381
Okay, I'll post this here and wait until that CRT is finished before getting started.


Anyway, if some staff members still want to say that this is just a joke or something, I mean, we've accepted things like Family Guy's animators, so I don't think we should use the argument that it's just a joke, that it's just for fun, to refute it.

As for why I didn't suggest 1A, it's simply because I didn't dare touch it, and besides, it's Ant's favorite verse, so I didn't want to make things difficult for him.

Edit: Anyway, if this fails, we can still give all characters "Limited Plot Manipulation" since the storyline resets after each episode.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, unless either an argument can be made for them being crucial for the long-term in-universe narrative or an argument refuting how they don't fall within such limitations as to have a profile.
 
Yeah, unless either an argument can be made for them being crucial for the long-term in-universe narrative or an argument refuting how they don't fall within such limitations as to have a profile.
Hmm... so their role in production and controlling the storyline isn't enough? As far as I remember, the image of the two of them also appears in this song as it recounts all the episodes and everything they went through.

Furthermore, the show's self-importance that it is actually a meta-level show is repeated quite a lot.
 
Well, for a reason I said "in-universe", otherwise it'd be possible to make a profile for every single writer for any work, which would get rather problematic quickly to say the least, these rules exist mainly as to avoid controversies involving real people, especially in cases where they're pitched to the death in vs threads from what I recall.

I'm neutral for now.
 
Well, for a reason I said "in-universe", otherwise it'd be possible to make a profile for every single writer for any work, which would get rather problematic quickly to say the least, these rules exist mainly as to avoid controversies involving real people, especially in cases where they're pitched to the death in vs threads from what I recall.

I'm neutral for now.
Could this be some pretty good additional evidence of how important they are to the storyline?

Additionally, a small addition here is when Doof states that the robot's height depends on the artist.
 
Last edited:
Love the guys and the verse, but I think it falls under “Logan Paul” rule. They are not fictional stand-ins, they are them, regardless of how relevant they are.
 
Love the guys and the verse, but I think it falls under “Logan Paul” rule. They are not fictional stand-ins, they are them, regardless of how relevant they are.
What I mean is, we allow it if it's a form of satire and impacts the official storyline, like Spongebob does, for example, they allow the use of real-life characters.
 
Anyway, if this fails, I just want to say we can keep the "Passive Limited Plot Manipulation" for all characters because the storyline resets after each episode.
 
Oh you don’t know that one? We had WWE Logan page, but it was deemed too close to IRL person, with associated problems, and thus the rule was made.
 
Oh you don’t know that one? We had WWE Logan page, but it was deemed too close to IRL person, with associated problems, and thus the rule was made.
What do you think about Limited Passive Plot Manipulation anyways?
 
Could this be some pretty good additional evidence of how important they are to the storyline?

Shortly after the whole episode is stated to not be canon to begin with, not that this'd have supported better some way to distance their portrayal from their IRL selves, but it does support the humoristic intent of their involvement like with Spongebob's situation.

Additionally, a small addition here is when Doof states that the robot's height depends on the artist.

This'd be fine to justify some minor degree of size manip on the robots.

Anyway, if this fails, I just want to say we can keep the "Passive Limited Plot Manipulation" for all characters because the storyline resets after each episode.

This is not passive, as it just resets sometime before the next episode, which is a set and done event over something that's defined actively, but fine beyond that. Given the lack of a concrete timeframe I doubt that this'd be combat applicable, however.
 
This is not passive, as it just resets sometime before the next episode, which is a set and done event over something that's defined actively, but fine beyond that. Given the lack of a concrete timeframe I doubt that this'd be combat applicable, however.

Then just limited plot manipulation
 
Back
Top