• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

T-X vs T-3000

The only way I see the T-X taking this is with its system corrupter, and even then, willpower alone was enough for the T-850 (a full machine without the mental range and human traits of John Connor) to resist it. We also don't know what it would do if it did work on the T-3000, since all we saw it do in Terminator 3 was turn a reprogrammed T-850 back into a machine that wants to kill things and...well, the T-3000 is already that and then some.


Outside of that, the T-X has got nothing that can bring the T-3000 down for good, and the difference in survivability is pretty clear-cut. The T-3000 walked away from an explosion that destroyed a bunker. IIRC, the T-X got blown to Kingdom Come by the same kind of blast power. On top of that, T-3000's Regenerationn is far superior, since it more or less functions the exact same way as the T-1000. T-X's regen couldn't even prevent it from losing the limbs that it did. That was the main reason it lost at the end of Terminator 3.

Giving it to the T-3000 at least 7/10.
 
Terminator 3 T-850 VS
Terminator 3 T-850 VS. T-X part 2


1:43 - T-X' legs have been badly damaged by a helicopter.

2:12 - T-X arm has been damaged by T-850


Terminator Genisys Pops vs T-3000
Terminator Genisys Pops vs T-3000

1:30 - T-3000 is able to easily cut off T-800's arm.


John also has better strength, speed, hand2hand skills.


So T-3000 wins 9/10.
 
Ok clearly you guys are misinformed, can't really blame you, this wiki leaves much to be desired, but the T-X has way more weapons that whats she's shown, one of which includes a EMP emitter which I'm guessing would cause the T-3000 to full apart, and even if its not we'v seen that lasers alone are enough to at least damaged the surface, and the T-X has a lser x ray burst gun, not to mention a plasma canon, which would do a hell of a lot more damage than the lasers,

also just saying from showings the T-X seems a hell of a lot stronger too.
 
Blazing Sky II said:
Ok clearly you guys are misinformed, can't really blame you, this wiki leaves much to be desired, but the T-X has way more weapons that whats she's shown, one of which includes a EMP emitter which I'm guessing would cause the T-3000 to full apart, and even if its not we'v seen that lasers alone are enough to at least damaged the surface, and the T-X has a lser x ray burst gun, not to mention a plasma canon, which would do a hell of a lot more damage than the lasers,
also just saying from showings the T-X seems a hell of a lot stronger too.
All of her weapons have no feats for destroying T-3000.
 
He said no feats for destroying the T-3000. As in, it doesn't have anything that would be applicable in regards to beating the T-3000 in a fight.

Also, the claim that we're "misinformed" is faulty, seeing as two of us have directly spoken of events that happened within the movies, including details not even mentioned on their profiles.
 
I mean, you're entitled to your vote and all. Nobody's taking that away from you. But us not agreeing with you doesn't make us "not good listerners". Your word isn't law.
 
I'm just making my point, if watch the scene where the T-X is looking for a weapon replacement, she cycles through alternatives, two of which were, emp generator and nano disruptor
 
Blazing Sky II said:
And the T-3000 has no feats of destroying the T-X this is a forum everything is speculaio
T-X can be badly damaged by a helicopter and/or T-850. T-3000 will stomp her.
 
Blazing Sky II said:
You're not good listerners or watchers, T-X wins via either EMP Generator or Plasma cano
Her EMP generator has no feats at all. Her plasma weapon is so weak that it cannot even melt solid metal. T-3000 tanked the laser which can EASILY CUT METALS.
 
Jockey-1337 said:
Blazing Sky II said:
You're not good listerners or watchers, T-X wins via either EMP Generator or Plasma cano
Her EMP generator has no feats at all. Her plasma weapon is so weak that it cannot even melt solid metal. T-3000 tanked the laser which can EASILY CUT METALS.
"so weak" ? it destroyed a T-1000 in just one blast, the T-3000 was damaged by weak lasers, her plasma canon has a lot more destructive potential than that, T-X also has nano disrutors so yea....instant stomp T-X wins
 
Blazing Sky II said:
Jockey-1337 said:
Blazing Sky II said:
You're not good listerners or watchers, T-X wins via either EMP Generator or Plasma cano
Her EMP generator has no feats at all. Her plasma weapon is so weak that it cannot even melt solid metal. T-3000 tanked the laser which can EASILY CUT METALS.
"so weak" ? it destroyed a T-1000 in just one blast, the T-3000 was damaged by weak lasers, her plasma canon has a lot more destructive potential than that, T-X also has nano disrutors so yea....instant stomp T-X wins
1) Not in 1 shot. Also, T-1000 is "liquid" and can be melted by lesser temperatures. Also T-1000 can be destroyed by some acids so T-1000 is not a good "example" for your arguments.

2) T-850 is able to survive her shots. He also has enough brute force to breake her arm.

3) T-3000 tanked a bunker-destroying bomb(s).

4) Nano disruptors have no feats at all.
 
Break is a generous word, inconvinience is probably more accurate.

NANO DISRUPTORS HAVE THE FEATS OF DISRUPTING NANO TECH, THE STUFF T-3000 IS F**KING MADE OF

as far i'm concerned thats a win, end of story
 
Blazing Sky II said:
Break is a generous word, inconvinience is probably more accurate.
NANO DISRUPTORS HAVE THE FEATS OF DISRUPTING NANO TECH, THE STUFF T-3000 IS F**KING MADE OF

as far i'm concerned thats a win, end of story
By your logic Star Destroyers from Star Wars are able to destroy stars simply because they have such a "name".


Actually we don't know how many nanorobots her weapon can destroy before it will be broken.

T-X is stupid and can be outmaneuvered even by random humans (have a look at 1:30).


Terminator 3 Rise of the machine Last Of Scene HD-0
Terminator 3 Rise of the machine Last Of Scene HD-0
 
Only this has nothing to do with metaphore just accept T-X wins, and she was drawing that cop in by driving so fast so she could get his gun.
 
Back
Top