- 42,612
- 36,890
- Thread starter
- #41
Nope!@DaReaperMan No offense, but are you sure it's wise to make a CRT for a verse you don't really understand?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope!@DaReaperMan No offense, but are you sure it's wise to make a CRT for a verse you don't really understand?
I'm not really arguingIt's fine if you don't have knowledge on DC, I myself stopped reading a comics awhile ago when Perpetua was first introduced, but I feel it makes your arguments stronger if you have the context ya know?
I believe it was supposed to be the highest level they've consistently shown.I'm not really arguing
But if there are alot of tier 5 feats then why is most of DC 4-B?
Yes eliminate them, the scale prime to the post crisis heroes does not make sense as we can see in Siniestro War where SBP without being at full power> literally all an army of more than dozens of superheroes of the level close to or higher than supermanhmm, should i remove those from the feats then? I'm not exactly a comic book expert
That's been said like 2-3 times on the thread already lolAbout the shattering space time continuums with Superman and Golden Age Superman, didn't that particular story show that the boundaries between universes were weakened? At least that's what I've heard
Yeah pretty much. There's only one direct statement for it to my knowledge and it's from an unreliable source, but it seems fine from a holistic stance. The events of Infinite Crisis inherently would weaken the Universe. At best it's a supporting feat, if even.About the shattering space time continuums with Superman and Golden Age Superman, didn't that particular story show that the boundaries between universes were weakened? At least that's what I've heard
Universe is a 4-D structure, a weak 4-D structure still would be 4-D, unless it is stated that the universe on the case has become 3-D...Yes, unstable does mean easily breakable. It means it's a universe that isn't fully stable and isn't a durable as it normally is. Breaking down a wall with a massive crack in it isn't wall level. I'm not buying that breaking apart an unstable universe is Low 2-C.
that seems quite passive agressive jeezOh boy. Can't wait to see the excuses made here.
Outliers, thread closing gg no reOh boy. Can't wait to see the excuses made here.
Can you guys not?Outliers, thread closing gg no re
this soon-to-be-shitshow.
I love how all of this is just peopld complaining about the thread getting closed.
If it continues like this it will make it difficult to finish the threadOutliers, thread closing gg no re
Also please consider how many characters this would scale to.
Are not, but most of Superman's Low 2-C feats are when he is at his peak. A "4-B, at most Low 2-C" should work
So, a High 3-A character can now destroy "unstable" Low 2-C universes?...Yes, unstable does mean easily breakable. It means it's a universe that isn't fully stable and isn't a durable as it normally is. Breaking down a wall with a massive crack in it isn't wall level. I'm not buying that breaking apart an unstable universe is Low 2-C.
Time... is a luxury I have!Also please consider how many characters this would scale to.
Easily breakable, probably not. It's still unquantifiable. The Multiverse being unstable would make it easier to break, that much should be undeniable. If you have evidence quantifying how weakened it was, I'd love to see it.Unstable doesn't mean easily breakable. And its still the whole universe, and no matter how unstable it might get, this feat is still clear cut Low 2-C. Your
not having a Tier 4 breaking apart the universe.
Could you clarify what you mean with the first part? I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing it's a Low 2-C feat for Orion. The "1/5th Universal" feat is from Cosmic Odyssey #4. It's also a chain reaction.Nothing much to say here. The device is a up to Low 2-C (would reverse this entire chain-reaction which would make the entire universe collapse into a black hole), but other than that this is correct. Citation for the last part is needed.
Er, care to elaborate why he would at least be giving 1/4th? Him helping could be 1/100th for all we know.I agree, though this does have some breathing room, since as already discussed Captain Adam>Superman on multiple occasions. Though as for this story I am uncertain, it is unreasonable to say that he didn't at least give 1/4th.
I don't think you understand the point. There was a scan used from Infinite Crisis for Post-Crisis Superman scaling to Golden Age. However, it was stated in JLA #74 Golden Age started to decrease in power, and DC Comics Presents Annual #1 shows he was below Pre-Crisis. More time passes by until we get to Infinite Crisis, which has the same older Golden Age Superman (well he's actually even older than before, but you get the point).This scan presented is from Justice League of America (1960) Issue #74, while DC Comics Presents Annual #1 is from September 1982.
Yeah I'd say so. I don't remember the argument from the opposition though so I'd need one of them to show up."This is one of the ones I'm fine with, but the wiki isn't. I believe the problem is proving he was truly a full Universe?"
Pretty clear cut that they are.
You do have a point, but he definitely downscaled. It's probably still Universal though they fought for a prolonged period of time.The Time Trapper scan also shows a clear one-on-one fight between the two, which also left Time Trapper significantly affected from the encounter.
He solos the entire league. He says he was using "the power of countless red suns" but I'm unsure of it's supposed to be taken literally. Also, even then he took out multiple Superman-tiers.Can you post direct scans? From what i've heard Starbreaker stomped Superman, so I can go along with this.
I think either point of view has merit. I do lean towards it not being an illusion though considering.Nothing much to say here. I accept it as not an illusion, but you don't seem to have anything wrong with this.
Alright. Do you have the citation for the issue? The 1st one being written by Grant Morrison shows to me it can be Universal. Being the Lord of Time also just refers to him time travelling.This one is a pretty clear cut 4D=Universal, for starters, the man is the Lord of Time, suggesting a mastery over the timeline, Grant Morrison treats the fourth dimension as the dimension of time, but the first scan is just a pure "4D doesn't mean Universal feat".
It's still a different version of Firestorm. Being mad isn't the only thing, please check out this thread.Pretty sure high-emotional turbulence doesn't mean just mad. But in defense of the defense, it was stated that there was a very small chance it could happen, not like he had the full power of a big bang, but that he had a small chance of triggering one.
Alright. Glad we could agree on a decent amount of points.I agree.
Eh, fair enough.Universe is a 4-D structure, a weak 4-D structure still would be 4-D, unless it is stated that the universe on the case has become 3-D
There are many Low 2-C featsHonestly I'm against getting rid of 4-B outright, it's also possible that this could be the case of different writers writing him with different limits. At most he should get a possibly/likely or something like that
Tbh I don’t think scaling every single character who’s ever fought Superman to his peak feats would be a good idea. Superman noticeably holds back 99% of the time out of moral obligation, even against characters noticeably stronger than him. It’s a central aspect of his character, even.Also please consider how many characters this would scale to.
True but a lot of characters have atleast 1 example of fighting what could be called a "peak supes" or atleast scale to someone who has.Tbh I don’t think scaling every single character who’s ever fought Superman to his peak feats would be a good idea. Superman noticeably holds back 99% of the time out of moral obligation, even against characters noticeably stronger than him. It’s a central aspect of his character, even.
Okay I actually laughed at that, good job!Attack Potency:Unknown (Whatever is needed for the sake of the plot, regardless of how consistent it is with prior showings. Always holding back whether it makes sense or not.)
Boundaries being weakened doesn’t devalue nearly destroying a universe. If I destroy a wall around a kingdom, me busting the kingdom doesn’t suddenly become illegitimate.About the shattering space time continuums with Superman and Golden Age Superman, didn't that particular story show that the boundaries between universes were weakened? At least that's what I've heard