Super Saiyan Blue Kaioken X20 Goku being Tier 2-C

[Whynore]

Wouldn't Blue Kaioken not be considered 2-C due to it obviously being considered low 2-C but twice to a thousand times in the same amount of time or with the same amount of attacks. Kaioken is a linear multiplier so a Kaioken X10 and 20 is 10 and 20X whatever form the user is in. Blue is considered Low 2-C so using any Kaioken would be considered 2-C and goku has shown the ability to use Blue Kaioken X20 for extended periods of time with no major repercussions during the tournament of power and continued fighting.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Not really, we don't jump from Low 2-C to 2-C via multipliers like that.

 

[Thelastmlg]

no, multipliers don't let you go from low 2-C to 2-C, cuz the difference also requires your power to cross the distance betwen universes which is unknown, so we can't accept multipliers for it, even infinite ones, i assume due to it being higher dimensional space too so it could be infinite or a few centimeters or whatever

 

[Nullflowerblush]

what if the distance between universes was displayed on-screen?

 

[Thelastmlg]

what if the distance between universes was displayed on-screen?

that is a good question, i also thought about, but i assume that due to universes usually being "bubbles" and stuff, the size would be unreliable or someshit

 

[Robo432343]

shouldn't it be something like, "low 2-c, far higher"???

 

[Arthex]

no, multipliers don't let you go from low 2-C to 2-C, cuz the difference also requires your power to cross the distance betwen universes which is unknown, so we can't accept multipliers for it, even infinite ones, i assume due to it being higher dimensional space too so it could be infinite or a few centimeters or whatever

I mean the higher dimensional space always sounds confusing to me, because the wiki doesn't accept multipliers for 2C characters either.

 

[Thelastmlg]

I mean the higher dimensional space always sounds confusing to me, because the wiki doesn't accept multipliers for 2C characters either.

yeah is weird, i think is cuz it assumes the distance is also not the same

 

[Thelastmlg]

shouldn't it be something like, "low 2-c, far higher"???

well, i think kaioken is not considered a transformation here, and "far higher via kaioken" would be the same as "far higher via statistic amplification" and that seems redundant