• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

STRONGEST One-Punch Man Discussion Thread!

Alexander said:
if so, then it would mean that his power is made to the power of 2 every time he punches.
I approximately counted more than 3 or 4 punches:
so,is 16 to power of the base state of saitama:
it will be like this:
4.3E+517 joule
with that logic, goku would be super dead,and you would have to use a calculation to calculate how much energy is needed to destroy a dimension(I think it would be 10 or 11 dimensional)
Click to expand...
... What?
 
Btw I do agree that the manga dropped off by quite a lot as soon as Garou started fighting Bang. I think the CF fight regained that momentum and even though Garou’s arc wasn’t the same as in WC I still think the fight had a satisfying conclusion… before the time travel.


That was just a really odd decision narratively, I hope they amend that. Or like… play it a bit better.
 
TBH l dont know why there are people who think the WC is better than the manga and vice versa. I think these two things have similiar qualities that make them actually enjoyable. why do we gotta say one is better then the other but in actuality they arent in fact?
 
Magmag said:
yes lol
Click to expand...
To save time, I'm just going to quote a few posts I made on the MCU's Phase 4 in another thread:

Overall, I personally think that there were some good ideas in Phase 4, but a lot of them fell flat on their faces or fizzled out in execution.

I liked Hawkeye, but felt like it needed more episodes. The deleted scenes would have added a lot more to the investment the story wanted us to feel in characters like Kate and Echo, and would have given more impact to Kingpin's presence rather than waiting until episode 5 to reveal him for shock value.

Loki had a lot of interesting concepts, but I remember watching The Avengers not long after that, and one of my first thoughts was "this... really doesn't seem like this is the same Loki we're talking about", and it's somewhat wild to think Lightning McQueen having an intervention would make Loki an even better person than his character development throughout the movies, and I think it would have made sense for him to try to play along and try to get an edge over the TVA and such.

The Falcon and the Winter Soldier introduced the idea of seeing how the world adjusted to the snap and to the blip, but it felt like an anti-racism PSA more often than not, plot twists were telegraphed as heck, and I cringed when Sam said Karli wasn't a terrorist. Honestly, John Walker and Zemo were my favorite parts of the show, and they were supposed to be portrayed as, I don't wanna say "bad guys", but not the characters the show wanted you to care about as much.

Moon Knight was cool, and Oscar Isaac did phenomenal with the role, but it didn't feel violent enough for a Moon Knight series, and I think it would have worked so much better for the character if the show had vibes similar to Daredevil or The Punisher in terms of choreography and violence.

Moon Knight be killin' dudes.

I liked Shang-Chi, but the dragons at the end kind of just.... came out of nowhere. That was the weakest part of the film for me.

From what I heard of Black Widow, they full on changed Taskmaster's gender (which, OK, do you, I guess, MCU? They kind of did that with Flag Smasher, too, but I digress) which isn't really as big of a deal as what I'm gonna mention next. They also seemed to remove a lot of Taskmaster's personality, which... why? Like, Taskmaster in the comics cracks a lot of jokes, and the idea of the character that can copy any skill and retain it at the cost of long-term memories really could have been fleshed out in a film which has the overarching theme of the importance of family.

Also, why were they not on Natasha's case for her teaming up with Yelena, who caused an avalanche over a prison, after the Sokovia Accords, which were specifically addressing instances of collateral damage caused by Avengers and their shenanigans?

Didn't watch Ms. Marvel. Someone who hates the MCU and is a Muslim and someone who likes content put out by the MCU both told me to skip the show, so I followed their advice lol. I will say that I felt from the jump that changing the origin of Kamala Khan's powers was not the move. At all.

Regarding Thor: Love and Thunder (what this thread is actually about lol), I felt from the beginning that Gorr the God Butcher wouldn't be a fit for the more comedic Thor we'd been getting at this point. I was right, especially since every single source I've seen review the movie said the comedy was played up to the point where nothing was taken seriously, and that a lot of the jokes didn't even land. I've also consistently heard people say Gorr was the best part about the movie, yet he had far too little screen time, and that Gorr the God Butcher didn't really butcher any gods aside from the opening scene. In the comics, Gorr was sadistic in the way that he tortured gods before killing them as a means of payback for all the years of neglect he had received from the gods, and in nearly accomplishing his goal to eradicate all the gods, he was somewhat turning into a type of tyrannical god himself, one that tortured and took pleasure in the pain of gods rather than mortals. They could have had more opportunity to show that sadistic side of Gorr by having him kill gods, or the subtle hypocrisy slipping in as the film progresses, or even take him in a different direction entirely that the fans would have enjoyed, but instead of doing that, he ended up kidnapping more children than he did butchering of gods, all while not having enough screen time when he was the best part about the movie.

Spider-Man: No Way Home was phenomenal. It managed to use nostalgia to further the story, not to replace or mask the absence of a story. I've heard someone say that that Homecoming was Peter with responsibility but without power- hence him feeling he was nothing without the suit- and that Far From Home was Peter with the power but not the responsibility- something that can be seen by Peter trying to have a normal field trip/vacation- and finally, No Way Home is where both are put together, with Aunt May telling him (with the actual quote from the original comic) "with great power, there must also come great responsibility". I also like how both the Raimi Spider-Man and Amazing Spider-Man gave advice that would be represented with their actions later in the film: Peter 2 (Raimi Spider-Man) talks about revenge not being satisfying, and steps in front of Peter 1 to keep him from killing the Green Goblin, and Peter 3 talks about his grief and rage after losing Gwen, and he gets his redemption and keeps Peter 1 from suffering that grief by saving MJ. And I love how Peter has gone back to basics at the end of the film. Honestly, the suit at the end is the best Spider-Man suit out of every suit I've seen in a Spider-Man live-action film. I watched a video by Browntable, talking about hype culture ruining the MCU to hear his take, and one of the things he mentioned about the film was that when there was a reference such as "You know, I'm something of a scientist myself" or the appearances of the other Spider-Men with the Sling Rings, there were pauses you'd barely notice in a theater, but seem like they're waiting for fans to applaud when you rewatch it on your own later. Personally, I don't mind, but I hope the MCU doesn't start relying on or abusing nostalgia and guest cameos too much.

Other movies I had just lost interest in (e.g. Multiverse of Madness, WandaVision), and others I just wasn't interested in (e.g. Eternals).
Click to expand...
Yeah, with the MCU, I've reached "I'm not mad (usually), just disappointed" territory with a lot of the stuff they've been putting out recently. I've been reading John Byrne's Sensational She-Hulk run, which is a really fun comic with lots of fourth wall breaks courtesy of Shulkie herself, and I'm sincerely hoping that the She-Hulk series on Disney+ will be good when that drops. I've always loved the character, and she's back in my ever-fluctuating top 10 favorite comic characters, with the only really locked in spots being Spider-Man and Moon Knight.

I've also noticed that it seems like the MCU is kind of making the same mistake as the comics in the sense that it's now seeming like just like you had to read a bunch of comics to get an idea of what was going on in a certain arc, you have to do the same thing for movies as well. A complaint people had about Multiverse of Madness was that it seemed like you had to watch WandaVision before hand to understand "What's a darkhold? What kids are Wanda talking about? What is Westview? What happened there?". I saw a video by captainmidnight talking about this same issue, and he pointed out how this was always a thing with the MCU, but it seems as though it's become more prevalent because the MCU has churned out more movies yearly (they used to do 1-2 yearly, but then went to 3 near the end of Phase 3, and 4 by the start of Phase 4) along with Disney+ shows being about an extra 6 hours worth of content per show. That's something that makes following along more of a tall order for someone who wants to get into the MCU: not impossible, just more difficult.

Also, speaking of what I said about what's going on in a certain arc of comics, what endgame (no pun intended) is Phase 4 shooting for? Kang? Galactus? You knew early on in the previous Phases that all roads led to Thanos, yet I have no idea what's supposed to tie The Eternals, Loki, Falcon and the Winter Soldier, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, Spider-Man: No Way Home, Ms. Marvel, Hawkeye, Thor: Love and Thunder, She-Hulk, etc. together, if anything.\
Click to expand...
 
CorneredHarbor said:
... What?
Click to expand...
he said that each blow of saitama increases it in power by 2 (that is, instead of being a 10*2 it is a 10*10, that is, the number by the same number)
So, I did the calculation of how many hits Saitama threw (4 at least for me) and that big number came out, but I'll do it again(this time with 16)
 
so,is gave me at least 1.97E+1000 joules of energy(Theoretically, if the dimensional scale had a power level, it would be more or less like this)
3 dimension:3.03E+103 joules
4 dimension:9.19E+155
5 dimension:2.78E+208
6 dimension:8.4E+260
It continues to be done at the theoretical power level of the dimensional scale (I say theoretical, because as I said it is only theoretical)
the final result is high 20 dimensional(hyperversal)like i say,is only a theorical number with a theorical calculation
 
Last edited:
Alexander said:
he said that each blow of saitama increases it in power by 2 (that is, instead of being a 10*2 it is a 10*10, that is, the number by the same number)
So, I did the calculation of how many hits Saitama threw (4 at least for me) and that big number came out, but I'll do it again(this time with 16)
Click to expand...
I get that, that's good and all. But what struck me was when you said: "you would need to use a calculation to calculate how much energy it would need to destroy a dimension ( i think it would be 10 or 11 dimensional). What excatly are you refering to here by " dimensions"? Spatial dimension or do you mean a universe? Either way, that is literally impossible to calc in conventional energy values.
 
CorneredHarbor said:
I get that, that's good and all. But what struck me was when you said: "you would need to use a calculation to calculate how much energy it would need to destroy a dimension ( i think it would be 10 or 11 dimensional). What excatly are you refering to here by " dimensions"? Spatial dimension or do you mean a universe? Either way, that is literally impossible to calc in conventional energy values.
Click to expand...
What I mean is that (listen carefully to what I'm saying) if, theoretically, there was a theoretical way to calculate the energy needed to destroy a spatial dimension, theoretically a character capable of generating that theoretical amount of energy would be that dimensional level (I will say theoretically many times)
 
Alexander said:
so,is gave me at least 1.97E+1000 joules of energy(Theoretically, if the dimensional scale had a power level, it would be more or less like this)
3 dimension:3.03E+103 joules
4 dimension:9.19E+155
5 dimension:2.78E+208
6 dimension:8.4E+260
It continues to be done at the theoretical power level of the dimensional scale (I say theoretical, because as I said it is only theoretical)
the final result is high 20 dimensional(hyperversal)like i say,is only a theorical number with a theorical calculation
Click to expand...
I see.
 
Alexander said:
What I mean is that (listen carefully to what I'm saying) if, theoretically, there was a theoretical way to calculate the energy needed to destroy a spatial dimension, theoretically a character capable of generating that theoretical amount of energy would be that dimensional level (I will say theoretically many times)
Click to expand...
No need to repeat yourself. I just didn't see your first comment explaining your theorethical dimensional calculations. That was my bad.
 
Matthew_Schroeder said:

One guy recreated the manga panels on blender and set up a light projection to simulate the lighting and he ended up with the conclusion that the black spot is the moon.
Click to expand...
my question is, what was the "boom" effect on the panel, which indicated that something was destroyed? And why did Murata make the moon a black sphere instead of how he would normally illustrate it? Likewise, the angle of sunlight in the panel would make it logically impossible for that side of the moon to be dark.
 
Some people think that Saitama Jupiter feat is Multi continental level to Moon level at best....
8589818-img_20220723_231655.jpg

8589819-img_20220723_231639.jpg
 
Back when it trended on twitter there was a concerningly high amount of people who legit thought dispersing Jupiter wasn't that impressive/earth level because it was mostly made out of gas and "gas weak", completely disregarding the difference in mass between earth and jupiter and it's monstrous gravitational pull.

Edit: not really talking about powerscalers here, just average anime enjoyers who use their actual faces as profile picture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

LIFE_OF_KING
Minor addition for Saitama
Replies
9
Views
1K
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
TyranoDoom30
OPM profiles possible renaming
Replies
6
Views
3K
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Genos Profile Rework
2
Replies
44
Views
6K
WizardPowers101
Kachon123
One-Punch Man: Adding Willpower to Some Profiles
Replies
12
Views
2K
Kachon123
Kachon123
Phoenks
  • Locked
"Possibly" 3-C Saitama
2 3 4
Replies
149
Views
17K
Phoenks
Phoenks
Back
Top