- 9,319
- 4,391
Me not getwhat
let me get setsuna or breeze
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me not getwhat
let me get setsuna or breeze
Yang law manip derives from his cultvation, which is 5-D at this pointwhy do u think yang kai's law manip is 5-D
You are conceding that Law manip could be potentially assumed to be 5-D, which is more or less just being 5-DYang law hax is 4D, only CM1 is 5D in his Open Heaven rank and last key, his law hax is based on incorporating World Principle into his attack, world principle is the fundamental principle that govern each world, World is 4D. You can stretch it to 5D though, still CFE is 5D with Large Size type 10
Yang kai arguably wins against Sora, while Kratos loses against him, this just seems like rock paper scissorsYang law hax is 4D, only CM1 is 5D in his Open Heaven rank and last key, his law hax is based on incorporating World Principle into his attack, world principle is the fundamental principle that govern each world, World is 4D. You can stretch it to 5D though, still CFE is 5D with Large Size type 10
He doesn't resist yang law manip, I thinkif sora's resistance to yang kai's hax is 5-d then he just stomps
Sora resistance comes from not coming from this world, and resisting the laws of this current world, I don't think that would stop him from getting pumeled by Yang lawresisted
![]()
Kingdom Hearts (Entity)
Kingdom Hearts (キングダムハーツ Kingudamu Hātsu) is one of the major entities in the Kingdom Hearts universe. It is the heart of all worlds, and the source of ultimate power and wisdom. It can be seen as the heart of everything. Due to its great significance, it has repeatedly been sought by the...vsbattles.fandom.com
Nozumu should be above Yang Kai and Kratos imo.
Uhhh, i don't see the profile so just some questions. Is his NEP nature 1 or 2??, what kind of EE he resist???Nozumu should be above Yang Kai and Kratos imo.
Considering his NEP, 5-D type 1 CM, 2 layers 5-D EE and 5-D info manip type 2. And resistance to those haxs on 5-D level into 2 layers.
![]()
The Spirit of Eternity Sword-Hax Scaling and Penetrate
vsbattles.fandom.com
He also resist these shit on 5-D scale by 2 layers.
Space-Time Manipulation, Vibration Manipulation, Durability Negation, Plant Manipulation, BFR, Sense Manipulation, Explosion Manipulation, Darkness Manipulation, Absorption and Power Mimicry, Damage Transferal, Corrosion Inducement, and Mind Manipulation
Apostasy: An ability which allows Nozumu to kill gods, who can't permanently die due to reincarnation. Apostasy is an ability which erases it's targets name, power, and existence.Uhhh, i don't see the profile so just some questions. Is his NEP nature 1 or 2??, what kind of EE he resist???
Edit: damn, i'm blind, bruhh, so he is NEP Nature 1, still i need to research what kind of EE he resists
NEP type 1.Don't see anything in his profile that protects him from passive history ee
Time Power and Power of Destruction can interact with and erase NEP1, even NEP that lack historyNEP type 1.
Yeah, I conscede that Yang gets his ass kicked thenif sora's resistance comes from being unaffected by the laws of the world then how is Yang's law hax going to be effective here
also chinaman doesn't even start with law hax while any keyblade attack sora has is type 1 CM
Bill probably snaps and winswho do u think would win
bill cipher or timekeeper cookie
![]()
Timekeeper Cookie
Timekeeper Cookie is a Legendary Cookie in Cookie Run: OvenBreak. She is the future/alternate reality version of Croissant Cookie, and the director of the Time Balance Department. During the events of Operation Timeguard, Timekeeper Cookie starts messing with timelines and frames GingerBrave out...vsbattles.fandom.com
she can interact with legendary cookies who have ae 1 but nep might be an issueShe doesnt have Idea/NEP3 NPI so I don't think she can put Bill down for good.
her time stuff is conceptualAlso her starting move is Time BFR which Bill just comes back from/snaps her away
okay? you do know "conceptual bfr" doesnt exist right.her time stuff is conceptual
tf do they do, you never explainedwouldn't her passives save herself from losing and making it incon?
no, not passively destroy billOkay? So it will...passively destroy Bill? Is that what you mean? 'Cause Bill isn't a concept he is an idea that exists and doesn't exist at the same time.
Okay how tf is that gonna help when Bill has infinitely bigger range?passively destroying time, going to the end of time
Bills AE and NEP is his mindscape form tho?
Yes, all the foundational concepts and powers. The cosmology and powers come from her.does sugar swan have every single ability in the verse
Will she be added on the list? Just an FYI she also has Large Size Type 10.. Just so you can understand how she views things.. (She views Low 2-C Structures akin to a grain of sugar, and the cosmology as a tea set)nonduality is one of the most useless abilities to exist now
Any spot on 7-9 will do. I can also argue for Timekeeper Cookie being on the list.. especially with my new CRT on her abilities.yeah, i don't know where to place her though
i was thinking top 7
I mean if that's true then why is Slay the Princess rated so high in the first place?nonduality is one of the most useless abilities to exist now
AE1 and Transduality type 1 & 2, Transdual > NondualI mean if that's true then why is Slay the Princess rated so high in the first place?
I think you should remove Scared Ancestor from the list, he is oudated character, there is some revisions to remove and change abilities before which was accepted but no one bother to apply the changes to the profile. There ia also a currently ongoing CRT to upgrade his tier but get nowhereyeah, i don't know where to place her though
i was thinking top 7
Right, except a good portion of other characters on the list already have AE Type 1, and Transduality is meaningless as it is, given the reasons that have already been highlighted on this thread. Either you're trying to assume "qualitative superiority" over concepts thus describing something that is 1-A (and thus doesn't belong on this thread) or you're assuming a random description of Transduality over what the wiki actually says about the topic. If you assume that it's the old description, then you're trying to describe a 6D character, which again would not belong on this thread.AE1 and Transduality type 1 & 2, Transdual > Nondual
Idk why you clinging on transdual should be either 1-A or 6D, we discussing what currently on the profile, not what it could potentially is. Due to @DontTalkDT revision Nondual is useless while Transdual is still busted like before, except probably type 1 transdual, type 2 and 3 is still completely uninteractable. If you believe profile with transdual should be either 1-A or 6D, make a CRT about itRight, except a good portion of other characters on the list already have AE Type 1, and Transduality is meaningless as it is, given the reasons that have already been highlighted on this thread. Either you're trying to assume "qualitative superiority" over concepts thus describing something that is 1-A (and thus doesn't belong on this thread) or you're assuming a random description of Transduality over what the wiki actually says about the topic. If you assume that it's the old description, then you're trying to describe a 6D character, which again would not belong on this thread.
If you're discussing what's currently on the profile then transduality just straight up is 1-A, it directly invokes qualitative superiority. Also, no disrespect to DT, but I kinda don't care about what was said by him on it if it's not on the page for Nonduality. On that matter:Idk why you clinging on transdual should be either 1-A or 6D, we discussing what currently on the profile, not what it could potentially is. Due to @DontTalkDT revision Nondual is useless while Transdual is still busted like before, except probably type 1 transdual, type 2 and 3 is still completely uninteractable. If you believe profile with transdual should be either 1-A or 6D, make a CRT about it
Meanwhile, the page also describes transduality as being "nonduality but with qualitative superiority", and to leave no doubt as to what qualitative superiority implied, it linked to the qualitative superiority page (before and after current tiering system):
On the other hand, characters with transduality exist outside and independently of the logical systems that they're nondual regarding while also possessing qualitative superiority to them
Then maybe it should be specified what "type" of AE 1 you're talking about. I assume you're talking about Type 1 though, which isn't a unique feature on this list.Also AE1 have many types, just because you can interact with one or two types doesn't mean you can interact with other types
we discussing what on the profile, just because transdual can be 1-A doesn't invalidate this discussion because currently, the profile that have transdual in question is Low 1-C, so no matter what you say, it still Low 1-C thus the discussion is valid. If you have problem with it, make a CRT to make them 1-A, or downgrade their transdual to nondualIf you're discussing what's currently on the profile then transduality just straight up is 1-A, it directly invokes qualitative superiority.
You don't care what he said, but he himself made the revision, changed standard, and we discussing what standard provide, what is accepted, not what we think something should be, potentially be. If you have problem with it, change the standard made by DontTalk. By your logic, i could just say that i don't care what other say, my favorite verse is boundless and solo the rest of fictionsAlso, no disrespect to DT, but I kinda don't care about what was said by him on it if it's not on the page for Nonduality. On that matter:
I'm not the verse supporters, i just explain what existing on the profile from my own knowledgesThen maybe it should be specified what "type" of AE 1 you're talking about. I assume you're talking about Type 1 though, which isn't a unique feature on this list.
It's not a matter of "Transduality can be 1-A", it literally is 1-A, as the transduality page already shows, and as such any mentionings of transduality should either be interpreted as 1-A or assumed to be equal to nonduality which is not unreasonable, as the page itself specifies that the only difference between nonduality and transduality is that the latter involves qualitative superiority. That's literally on the page, the specific reason why transduality "immunizes attempts to force dualities onto a character" is because of qualitative superiority, and you're simultaneously opting for ignoring the qualitative superiority part (arguing that it isn't 1-A because the profile doesn't have 1-A listed as a tier) and opting for using it in scaling by offering "transduality" the benefits that are solely derived from a relationship of qualitative superiority.we discussing what on the profile, just because transdual can be 1-A doesn't invalidate this discussion because currently, the profile that have transdual in question is Low 1-C, so no matter what you say, it still Low 1-C thus the discussion is valid. If you have problem with it, make a CRT to make them 1-A, or downgrade their transdual to nondual
I literally quoted the standards to you verbatim, that's why I said I didn't care about what was "said" on the topic. Mind you, the page does contradict itself (ironic, given that it involves contradictions as characters) by saying Nonduality grants immunities and then backpedaling by saying "Actually the immunities are only present if the verse acknowledges that those immunities are because of nonduality", but regardless, I'm openly using the wiki's own standards that were published in this conversation, so your weird attempt to portray me as ignoring the standards to argue in favor of certain characters doesn't work. I'm just as aware that it's likely that the pages are going to be revised soon, either way.You don't care what he said, but he himself made the revision, changed standard, and we discussing what standard provide, what is accepted, not what we think something should be, potentially be. If you have problem with it, change the standard made by DontTalk. By your logic, i could just say that i don't care what other say, my favorite verse is boundless and solo the rest of fictions
It's not a matter of "Transduality can be 1-A", it literally is 1-A, as the transduality page already shows, and as such any mentionings of transduality should either be interpreted as 1-A or assumed to be equal to nonduality which is not unreasonable, as the page itself specifies that the only difference between nonduality and transduality is that the latter involves qualitative superiority. That's literally on the page, the specific reason why transduality "immunizes attempts to force dualities onto a character" is because of qualitative superiority, and you're simultaneously opting for ignoring the qualitative superiority part (arguing that it isn't 1-A because the profile doesn't have 1-A listed as a tier) and opting for using it in scaling by offering "transduality" the benefits that are solely derived from a relationship of qualitative superiority.
Please readOn the other hand, characters with transduality exist outside and independently of the logical systems that they're nondual regarding while also possessing qualitative superiority to them. Besides immunizing them against the dualities in question, this power also immunizes them against attempts to apply those dualities to them, as they would transcend the scope of the haxes that could do so.
If the page contradict itself, make CRT about it, no matter what you say, it is what it isI literally quoted the standards to you verbatim, that's why I said I didn't care about what was "said" on the topic. Mind you, the page does contradict itself (ironic, given that it involves contradictions as characters) by saying Nonduality grants immunities and then backpedaling by saying "Actually the immunities are only present if the verse acknowledges that those immunities are because of nonduality", but regardless, I'm openly using the wiki's own standards that were published in this conversation, so your weird attempt to portray me as ignoring the standards to argue in favor of certain characters doesn't work. I'm just as aware that it's likely that the pages are going to be revised soon, either way.
i made sora vs dbh and sora vs kratos and he stomped themWhy is sora on 4