• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Strongest 5-D Characters on the Wiki

Ben_CleverName said:
If you're discussing what's currently on the profile then transduality just straight up is 1-A, it directly invokes qualitative superiority.
Click to expand...
we discussing what on the profile, just because transdual can be 1-A doesn't invalidate this discussion because currently, the profile that have transdual in question is Low 1-C, so no matter what you say, it still Low 1-C thus the discussion is valid. If you have problem with it, make a CRT to make them 1-A, or downgrade their transdual to nondual
Ben_CleverName said:
Also, no disrespect to DT, but I kinda don't care about what was said by him on it if it's not on the page for Nonduality. On that matter:
Click to expand...
You don't care what he said, but he himself made the revision, changed standard, and we discussing what standard provide, what is accepted, not what we think something should be, potentially be. If you have problem with it, change the standard made by DontTalk. By your logic, i could just say that i don't care what other say, my favorite verse is boundless and solo the rest of fictions

Anyway, no offend, but all this arguments from you just hinged on: "They are transdual they should be 1-A so this discussion is invalid, but they are not 1-A so their transdual is meaningless, thus they should not be that high on the list"
You just arbitrary invalidate a power because it not what you think it should be, that not how it work

Ben_CleverName said:
Then maybe it should be specified what "type" of AE 1 you're talking about. I assume you're talking about Type 1 though, which isn't a unique feature on this list.
Click to expand...
I'm not the verse supporters, i just explain what existing on the profile from my own knowledges
 
Vietthai96 said:
we discussing what on the profile, just because transdual can be 1-A doesn't invalidate this discussion because currently, the profile that have transdual in question is Low 1-C, so no matter what you say, it still Low 1-C thus the discussion is valid. If you have problem with it, make a CRT to make them 1-A, or downgrade their transdual to nondual
Click to expand...
It's not a matter of "Transduality can be 1-A", it literally is 1-A, as the transduality page already shows, and as such any mentionings of transduality should either be interpreted as 1-A or assumed to be equal to nonduality which is not unreasonable, as the page itself specifies that the only difference between nonduality and transduality is that the latter involves qualitative superiority. That's literally on the page, the specific reason why transduality "immunizes attempts to force dualities onto a character" is because of qualitative superiority, and you're simultaneously opting for ignoring the qualitative superiority part (arguing that it isn't 1-A because the profile doesn't have 1-A listed as a tier) and opting for using it in scaling by offering "transduality" the benefits that are solely derived from a relationship of qualitative superiority.

You don't care what he said, but he himself made the revision, changed standard, and we discussing what standard provide, what is accepted, not what we think something should be, potentially be. If you have problem with it, change the standard made by DontTalk. By your logic, i could just say that i don't care what other say, my favorite verse is boundless and solo the rest of fictions
Click to expand...
I literally quoted the standards to you verbatim, that's why I said I didn't care about what was "said" on the topic. Mind you, the page does contradict itself (ironic, given that it involves contradictions as characters) by saying Nonduality grants immunities and then backpedaling by saying "Actually the immunities are only present if the verse acknowledges that those immunities are because of nonduality", but regardless, I'm openly using the wiki's own standards that were published in this conversation, so your weird attempt to portray me as ignoring the standards to argue in favor of certain characters doesn't work. I'm just as aware that it's likely that the pages are going to be revised soon, either way.
 
Ben_CleverName said:
It's not a matter of "Transduality can be 1-A", it literally is 1-A, as the transduality page already shows, and as such any mentionings of transduality should either be interpreted as 1-A or assumed to be equal to nonduality which is not unreasonable, as the page itself specifies that the only difference between nonduality and transduality is that the latter involves qualitative superiority. That's literally on the page, the specific reason why transduality "immunizes attempts to force dualities onto a character" is because of qualitative superiority, and you're simultaneously opting for ignoring the qualitative superiority part (arguing that it isn't 1-A because the profile doesn't have 1-A listed as a tier) and opting for using it in scaling by offering "transduality" the benefits that are solely derived from a relationship of qualitative superiority.
Click to expand...
On the other hand, characters with transduality exist outside and independently of the logical systems that they're nondual regarding while also possessing qualitative superiority to them. Besides immunizing them against the dualities in question, this power also immunizes them against attempts to apply those dualities to them, as they would transcend the scope of the haxes that could do so.
Click to expand...
Please read

Ben_CleverName said:
I literally quoted the standards to you verbatim, that's why I said I didn't care about what was "said" on the topic. Mind you, the page does contradict itself (ironic, given that it involves contradictions as characters) by saying Nonduality grants immunities and then backpedaling by saying "Actually the immunities are only present if the verse acknowledges that those immunities are because of nonduality", but regardless, I'm openly using the wiki's own standards that were published in this conversation, so your weird attempt to portray me as ignoring the standards to argue in favor of certain characters doesn't work. I'm just as aware that it's likely that the pages are going to be revised soon, either way.
Click to expand...
If the page contradict itself, make CRT about it, no matter what you say, it is what it is
 
Honestly, sora’s haxes are not passive or layered IIRC, what is preventing a dbh time god from just idk timestoping him or smth?
 
segetero said:
Honestly, sora’s haxes are not passive or layered IIRC, what is preventing a dbh time god from just idk timestoping him or smth?
Click to expand...
Yeah, Sora haxes need to hit to activate his hax, anyone who is worth their weight in salt can just...Activate their KI and meme sora with 5-D range. Doesn't help how the strongest characters negate Sora regeneration with several layers
 
Fezzih_007 said:
Existence Erasure - history (Sora kinda ressurects, but is just gonna be difficulty for him to do anything)
Layered Power Null
Stamina reduction

Probally there's more that i missing, but this mostly guarant that Sora won't be moving for his position where the battle start.
Click to expand...
Add passive corruption and mind hax aswell.
 
Vietthai96 said:
Please read


If the page contradict itself, make CRT about it, no matter what you say, it is what it is
Click to expand...
Uno_Reverse_dd62822b-6700-4cbd-890c-3a224fa44efe.jpg
 
vsbattles.fandom.com

The Overlord (Ninjago)

In the First Realm, only two races existed, the Oni, and the Dragons, beings who controlled creation and destruction, and who fought each other in an eternal stalemate. One day, however, a child who was born of both the Oni and the Dragon was born. This child, known as the First Spinjitzu...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

i have to put this guy above dbh
 
Robo432343 said:
shouldn't dbh characters have concept hax because of this?
Nonexistence Erasure (Passive & Active - Nature Type 1; Aspects Type 2 & 5 - Concepts & History
Click to expand...
Not really, EE a nonconceptual void doesn't grant you concept hax, since the concepts is absent and EE the void do not mean you interact with the concept cause it is absent so. You need to EE a conceptual realm to get CM hax, at least
 
im so confused
does universe tree Goku's EE erase someone the moment a fight starts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gamin_Yoon23
Strongest 6D Characters on the Wiki
4 5 6
Replies
238
Views
16K
IReallyLoveRilysse
IReallyLoveRilysse
Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
Strongest 4-D Characters on the Wiki
7 8 9
Replies
342
Views
47K
EL_xWatcher1234x
EL_xWatcher1234x
Spinoirr
Okay, is there ANY 8-D characters on this wiki
Replies
3
Views
538
Lycoris4812
Lycoris4812
Hecky2222
Strongest Planets in Fiction
2 3
Replies
112
Views
6K
WeeklyBattles
WeeklyBattles
Dark_Soul20189
Strongest weapons on the wiki.
Replies
34
Views
4K
AlipheeseXIV
AlipheeseXIV
Back
Top