CodeCCLL
He/Him- 3,338
- 2,258
By what standards do you say this? Sonic standards?Cause they are unchanging because they are Type 1 Concept beings
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By what standards do you say this? Sonic standards?Cause they are unchanging because they are Type 1 Concept beings
Acausality (Type 5 - M is beyond time, space and causality[4]. He exists as that which is not within, the outside itself[10], he is a transcendent being of the outer universe[11] of Sharnoth, which is an eternally unchanging world[1]. M is unchanging, with time, and anything else humans value holding no meaning to him[1])By what standards do you say this? Sonic standards?
I mean, im pretty sure type 1 concepts are more abstract/fundemental, and a concept type 2 nep would lack something less abstract/fundementalwe should talk about how it makes no sense for a guy with type 1 concept hax to interact with NEP 2 aspect 2 just because the concept they lack is a type 2 concept. it doesn't matter what number it is, they still lack the concept in the first place
saying, "he doesn't lack a type 1 concept so concept hax can work" doesn't make any sense
this guy is NOT interacting with this guy
it does not matter if the concept number is more fundamental if they lack the concept in the first placeI mean, im pretty sure type 1 concepts are more abstract/fundemental, and a concept type 2 nep would lack something less abstract/fundemental
They would not be lacking the more fundamental concept if they were an aspect 2 for CM2, also since it’s a type 2 Concept, could it still be interacted indirectly because it’s dependent on something in realityit does not matter if the concept number is more fundamental if they lack the concept in the first place
using your logic anyone with CM 1 can interact with nep 2 aspect 2 even though they have no feats of interacting with something like that just because the concept type is different
This doesnt prove anythingif garfield had conceptual manip type 1, do you think he would be able to interact with nep 2 aspect 2 just because the person with nep 2 aspect 2 is a type 2 concept?
Not on my watch he ain't.Billy cypher became 5-D boys, and Dante MAY also become 5-D
Correct, he is 10-DNot on my watch he ain't.
On an abstract/fundamental level, a Type 1 is above what it governs, while a Type 2 is on the same level as what it governsType 1 Concepts aren't more abstract, they're just independent of reality.
If thats the case, shouldnt a Type 2 Concept NEP still be affect still be affected by the alteration of reality, also the NEP page says "They are hence immune to regular manipulation of said concept(s). Which type of concept should be mentioned on the profile." which implies it depends what Type it isThey are not above it, they are independent, it's two separate things. Type 1 Concepts, can have superiority over what they govern, however in the default description, they don't.
That wrong, Type 1 is just independent of reality, the only concept type that is superior to what it governs is Platonic-type concept, since according to platonic concept, the physical reality is just a shadow, and extension of the abstract concept itself. Our type 1 concept is just a broad definition for all concepts that is independent from what it govern, Jungian Archetype also a concept that independent from reality but not superior to it. People just arbitrary think that Type 1 is all platonic-type concept since current type 1 is the fusion of old type 1 which is called true platonic concept and old type 2 which is called false platonic concept bruhhOn an abstract/fundamental level, a Type 1 is above what it governs, while a Type 2 is on the same level as what it governs
?If thats the case, shouldnt a Type 2 Concept NEP still be affect still be affected by the alteration of reality, also the NEP page says "They are hence immune to regular manipulation of said concept(s). Which type of concept should be mentioned on the profile." which implies it depends what Type it is
type 1 Cm is not interacting with nep 2 aspect 2 unless shown FRA...
Also my sematic nitpicking: independent =/= superiority. I'm independent from the house i built, doesn't mean i'm superior to it, the house can still crush me if it fall on me
NGMIHe can't tank a house falling over you
CM1 is just a broad term for concept that independent of reality, something that we, vsbw users created and i will repeat again, independent =/= superiority. There is no most logical explanation here, cause i already gave actual example of why independent concept doesn't mean said concept superior to what it governNGMI
In all reality, that is the most logical explination of how CM1 work
The CM Type 1 would not need to directly affect The Concept of Nothingness if the Concept is only type 2, and could instead affect what it's bounded to, if it's bounded to something nonexistent, then sure the Type 1 cant affect either without feats, but if it's bounded to something in reality, it can be affectedbro what are you talking about? the person with type 1 CM would need proof of affecting the concept of nothingness
How is the concept of circles for example going to govern nothingness? Nothingness isn't a circle, it isn't fire, it isn't any concept based on any existing thing. The only concept that would work would be the concept of nothingness which Garfield if he had CM 1 would need proof of affecting
I mean, depend, since the NEP guy lack concept aspect, CM can't interact with him, but some fiction characters have feat capable of applying concept into objects, person, etc....these kind of characters can definitely doing something to NEP guy who lack concept. So it is depending on available featsbroge thinks CM 1 can interact with nonexistent physiology type 2 aspect 2 if the person with NEP aspect 2 aspect is a type 2 concept
I editted my comment, but anyway like i said, depend on what kind of feats the guy with CM1 have been showing, if he has feat applying concept to objects, persons, etc...... then he can force a concept on the NEP guy, make him now do not lacking a concept anymore, but if CM1 guy have no such feat then yeah he can't do anythingwe are assuming the guy with CM 1 has no feats of interacting with nep 2 aspect 2 if he is a type 2 concept
those arent my own, thats just how concept type 2 works, it can be affected indirectly by what it’s bound toyou are just making up your own standards man..
lebron jamesi made this thread
![]()
ANSWER THIS QUESTION PLEASE
Character A has 8-D soul crush Character B has 5-D high godly regeneration Will Character A bypass the high godly regeneration? question2 basically character A has type 1 concept hax, has no feats of interacting with NEP 2 aspect 2 is fighting B who has nonexistent physiology type 2 aspect 2...vsbattles.com
Was this scenario even taken into account, it's not directly manipulating the Nonexistent Concept here@Brogeefrong see bro i told u
The CM Type 1 would not need to directly affect The Concept of Nothingness if the Concept is only type 2, and could instead affect what it's bounded to, if it's bounded to something nonexistent, then sure the Type 1 cant affect either without feats, but if it's bounded to something in reality, it can be affected
It’s not? Type 2 Concepts can be manipulated without directly interacting with themNo.
this is just a big ass NLF
lets wait till we get staff input
He mean that rather than directly interacting with concept, you can indirectly affect the concept by affect what the concept tied to, since Type 2 mean the concept itself is dependent on something, if you affect said thing, it will create a chain reaction that alter the conceptyes it is
saying someone with CM 1 can interact with type 2 concept nep with no feats is and will always be an nlf
Doesnt the concept still paradoxically exist, like what the NEP page says “Nonexistent Physiology refers to the ability to lack certain aspects of one's existence, to paradoxically 'exist,' yet lack certain identifiable traits of existence or exist outside of a particular scope of 'existence.'” and would still be tied to somethingHe mean that rather than directly interacting with concept, you can indirectly affect the concept by affect what the concept tied to, since Type 2 mean the concept itself is dependent on something, if you affect said thing, it will create a chain reaction that alter the concept
However in this case, CM1 guy try to affect the NEP guy that lack concept type 2, so it is pointless since there is no concept to interact with, and the concept is absence, it can't be tied to anything for CM1 guy to indirectly affect the concept via affect what the concept tied to.
Yeah thats for nothingness but what about lacking something the concept of something not inherently nonexistentAnd even if we sematically nitpicking thing, type 2 concept of nothingness will be tied to the nothingness itself, since it describe what is nothingness, that go back to the start where you need to be able interact with the nothingness first in order to indirectly affect type 2 concept of nothingness
unless the guy is NEP Nature 3, otherwise it make no sense. The paradoxical part is just mean that normally nothingness mean, nothing exist, however still some how existing, it have almost nothing on aspectDoesnt the concept still paradoxically exist, like what the NEP page says “Nonexistent Physiology refers to the ability to lack certain aspects of one's existence, to paradoxically 'exist,' yet lack certain identifiable traits of existence or exist outside of a particular scope of 'existence.'” and would still be tied to something
the.................what?????, now you make no sense bruhhYeah thats for nothingness but what about lacking something the concept of something not inherently nonexistent
If it somehow still exist, and counts as a concept, shouldnt it still be tied to whatever it’s linked to, also also if it is a Type 3, is it possible?unless the guy is NEP Nature 3, otherwise it make no sense. The paradoxical part is just mean that normally nothingness mean, nothing exist, however still some how existing, it have almost nothing on aspect
Like the concept is tied to nothingness in this situation, what if its something elsethe.................what?????, now you make no sense bruhh
moodTbf, current NEP is a mess
if the concept still exist, then the character in question will never lack it in the first place, which mean his nonexistence aspect is wrong, unless he is NEP Nature Type 3, which allow for paradoxical existence even with the aspectsIf it somehow still exist, and counts as a concept, shouldnt it still be tied to whatever it’s linked to, also also if it is a Type 3, is it possible?
no, it is impossible, concept type 3 tied with what it describes, concept type 2 of circle describe the fundamental principle of circle, and also tied to said circle, concept type 2 of nothingness describe properties of nothingness and also tied to it, you can't have a concept type 2 that somehow tied to a completely different thing that it not describe and govern over, the only concept that is possible in such a way in our current system is concept type 3, as it is lesser realist concept, it is tied to what it describe and govern, at the same time it is a part of a larger realityLike the concept is tied to nothingness in this situation, what if its something else
Surprising how M went from not so being quite broken ish (but still fairly powerful) to becoming pretty broken and even abstractically hard to affect lol.Amusing to see my obscure Nyarlathotep's generating pages of discussion.
Like us WABS guys are just chilling, and this discussion is still ongoing.
WUT. Really?Wizard101 might be getting tier 1-A now
More specifically, neither I nor Zenkai want to write the CRTs ourselves. If other people are interested, I can provide arguments, comment on the thread, and post relevant feats/statements, but I don't want to be the OP.but no one wants to make a CRT for it
bruh i knew it
i asked a staff member and he said someone with CM 1 cant interact with nep 2 aspect 2 even if its a type 2 concept
Bruhh, with NEP2 even if the character do not lack concept, CM1 user can't interact with it without feat bruhh, you aksed a very obvious questionNEP2
Wut??Another GoW downgrade thread
Wut??
GoW is going to have less hax than DB goku at this rateAnother GoW downgrade thread
To my understanding, the DBH cosmology is still composite, and I believe there is still a hyper-timeline based on the other universe in the timeline.oh wtf
![]()
Spaces in Times Dragon Ball revision
Continuation of this thread, will make the arguments very clear now with a voting poll from the beginning, full disclosure though, if this becomes as much of a mess and flood and the last thread i will ask for this to be closed and make a staff thread instead, clear? ok, so for the thread itself...vsbattles.com
No more 5-D DB???
This will replace the strongest non smurf....im so confused
how does ultima's thread affect this thread