Starry Skies

[Metal875]

If I was to absorb 70-90% of the stars in the sky, what tier would I be?

 

[Ultima_Reality]

I believe this would be 4-B (Solar System level) or 4-A (Multi-Solar System level)

 

[Primaris_Brian]

70-90% stars in the sky by what? human eyes? Multi solar system. Cause human eyes can't see all the stars in the universe, heck human eyes can't even see all the stars in the galaxy.

 

[Metal875]

70-90% stars in the sky by what? human eyes? Multi solar system. Cause human eyes can't see all the stars in the universe, heck human eyes can't even see all the stars in the galaxy.

Sorry I didn't specify. All stars by the sight of a telescope with a human looking through it.

 

[Primaris_Brian]

Well that is actually bazillion amount of stars..its above MSS but idk the exact tier.

 

[Kaltias]

According to this, a night sky is composed of 4548 stars. http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-resources/how-many-stars-night-sky-09172014/

If we use the GBE of the Sun as a lowball (6,87x10^41 N) we find 3,1492x10^45 J.

70% is 2,2044 x 10^45 J this is an extremely high end of Large Star level +

90% is 2,8343 x 10^45 J which is Solar System level.

If someone could check this it would be great.

 

[Primaris_Brian]

Actually yes night stars is not even MSS.

4-C	Star	150 Tenatons to 350 Tenatons	1.5x1032 to 3.5x1032	6.276x1041 to 1.4644x1042	~2.33x
High 4-C	Large Star	350 Tenatons to 22.4 Foe	3.5x1032 to 5.353x1035	1.4644x1042 to 2.24x1045	~1530x
4-B	Solar System	22.4 Foe to 22.586 TeraFoe	5.353x1035 to 5.398x1047	2.24x1045 to 2.2586x1057	~1.008 trillion x
4-A	Multi-Solar System	22.586 TeraFoe to 12.68 ZettaFoe	5.398x1047 to 3.03x1056	2.2586x1057 to 1.268x1066	~561.41 million x
3-C	Galaxy	12.68 ZettaFoe to 8.168 YottaFoe	3.03x1056 to 1.95x1059	1.268x1066 to 8.162x1068	~644x

Even if human eyes can see all the stars in the galaxy, we only have about 400 billions stars in the galaxy.

edit: it's actually billions.

 

[Kaltias]

If it is with a telescope, the value would be much higher but still 4-B

 

[Metal875]

Okay... so utilizing a telescope (basing it off of Kaltias' response. Thank you, by the way, you guys), it'd be somewhere in the midst of 4-B, I'm guessing.

 

[Primaris_Brian]

I thought with telescope we can see up to 13,8 billions light years? I mean with the best telescope.

 

[Kaltias]

Yes. The degree of 4-B depends from the zoom of the telescope

 

[Kaltias]

@NJS

Yes, but not all of it at once

 

[Metal875]

Question. If I absorbed all the stars in all directions instead of just one, would it change any? Including the telescope? If it reaches 13.8 billion LY, isn't that trillions of stars?

 

[Primaris_Brian]

Idk but people usually say there are hundreds of billions of galaxy on the observed universe and each one of those galaxy can have hundreds of billions of stars, but the observed universe is about 90 billions light years in diameter or something like that.

 

[Kaltias]

No idea about the 13.8 billion LY. But absorbing all the stars in the visible universe would be MSS, both if we assume 10^22 or 10^24 stars

http://m.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Herschel/How_many_stars_are_there_in_the_Universe

 

[Metal875]

Ahh, okay then. Thank you guys.

 

[Primaris_Brian]

1022 to 1024 of stars sounds much more than MSS. I mean trillions is only 1012 or something like that.

 

[Kaltias]

Keep in mind that the low end of MSS is 10^57 J.

10^24x10^41x6.87 = 6.87 x 10^65 J, and that's the 100%, not the 70-90

 

[Primaris_Brian]

And how many stars is 10^57 J? asume we use our sun.

 

[Kaltias]

Reaching baseline MSS requires 3,28762 x 10^15 stars, if they are like the sun

 

[Primaris_Brian]

So it's actually not an impressive feat.

 

[Kaltias]

I mean, an extremely high end of MSS is quite an impressive feat if you ask me. Sure, it isn't tier 3 despite affecting the universe, but it's still quite a very good feat

 

[Metal875]

Oh wait... so absorbing all the stars in the universe is Multi-Solar System level+?

 

[Kaltias]

Yes

 

[Primaris_Brian]

Well ppl generally got Tier 3-A or 3-C for destroying universe and galaxy and not just the stars itself, because in order to destroy something that is 2 times bigger in diameter, you will need 8 times the energy(2 times length x Width x Height = 8), 3 times bigger in diamater then you will need 27 times the energy, 10 times bigger in diameter then you will need 1000 times the energy.

 

[Kaltias]

Yeah. Considering how many orders of magnitude the size of the universe is compared to that of a galaxy it just make sense for the feat to be lower than tier 3. IIRC shaking and lighting up the universe are both 4-A as well

 

[Kaltias]

However, if mass-energy conversion was used for some reasons, absorbing all the stars in the universe would be 3-B.

1,787 x 10^71 J

 

[SparkOfTheAbsolute]

I would say 3-B because it affects many galaxies but still not the whole universe