- 20,105
- 10,899
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that the current rules seem fine, except for that "except for Admins" should probably be replaced with "except for Bureaucrats" to set some strict safeguards in place.Can they be applied now?
Sure thing, I don't mindI think that the current rules seem fine, except for that "except for Admins" should probably be replaced with "except for Bureaucrats" to set some strict safeguards in place.
I have no problem, you can simply ping them if you need further sensitive input regarding the topic!It seems best to wait a bit for further staff input first.
I reworded the proposal a bit to make it more streamlined.I think that the current rules seem fine, except for that "except for Admins" should probably be replaced with "except for Bureaucrats" to set some strict safeguards in place.
- Only staff members and regular members staff have deemed highly trustworthy may participate in Staff Discussion threads unless an explicit exception is noted.
- Only staff members with evaluation rights can authorize regular members to participate in Staff Discussion threads. Thread Moderators and Administrators can only grant permission for a single post at a time; only Bureaucrats have the discretion to grant permission for indefinite posting rights. If a staff member determines that a regular member has misused their granted privileges, another staff member can remove them.
- Regular members may not comment on Staff Discussion threads marked as "Restricted solely for staff members" under any circumstances, as such discussions cover sensitive wiki policy issues and other similar crucial matters that require great caution.
- In controversial Staff Discussion threads that must avoid spam and unconstructive bickering, regular members are only allowed one highly relevant post each to prevent thread spamming/hijacking. Only Bureaucrats may make exceptions to this rule, which should only happen when they deem the user's expertise/information essential.
Ping some people, then.It seems best to wait a bit for further staff input first.
This seems reasonable.I reworded the proposal a bit to make it more streamlined.
Seems we can apply the changesThank you very much for helping out here.
So, are we going to apply IdiosyncraticLawyer's rewording of your suggestions?Seems we can apply the changes
(I need to check what he reworded exactly before) I will take a look today.So, are we going to apply IdiosyncraticLawyer's rewording of your suggestions?
Ya! As I mentioned above previouslyWe probably need to create a section for staff threads. Since these rules don't fit with general content revision or franchise-specific rules.