• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Springfield upgrades n stuff

Also, why is Homer Subsonic+ despite the fact that his calc shows Supersonic value?
 
Antvasima said:
I continue to maintain that a single use inconsistency, that does not at all fit with his regular portrayal, should preferably not be added.
That would downgrade a lot of cartoon characters. As, a lot have one time abilities their pages have. Example. Daffy Duck has a one time Mid Godly Regen feat that we still seem to use. Despite it being a one time feat and the other times something similar happened, it was unusable due to outside help, or didn't even happen. That was just one example, another is Gumball Watterso getting Low-Godly Regen for a one time feat. Several cartoons and such have such abilities which should be removed should we decide to consider the one time they used it to be inconsistent.

For homer. He has never tried to interact with non physical except this one time. And other times in Treehouse horror (which he has successfully done)
 
Looney Tunes characters operate on gag humour cartoon physics, whereas Springfield is a much closer to reality suburban setting. Interacting with intangible objects would fit with the former, but definitely not with the latter.
 
Homer has on multiple and consistent occasions done stuff like left his own physical body as a ghost, and even once left his ghost body as some spirit of a spirit. Sure The Simpsons isn't super cartoonish to Looney toons standard. But by no means do they not stand on having those kinds of wacky kinds of feats. Going to an example to compare to. Peter had some one time feats. But since his show tends to break away from reality a lot, having such wacky feats like his Regen, and other gags, he tends to keep them. Homer has it general to a similar degree. Grabbing onto light isn't the strangest thing they have done.
 
A Simpsons character grabbing lasers or similar is very much outside of the norm for the show, and should be ignored as an outlier. I don't have the time and energy to continue to argue about it though.
 
Buttersamuri said:
Homer has on multiple and consistent occasions done stuff like left his own physical body as a ghost, and even once left his ghost body as some spirit of a spirit. Sure The Simpsons isn't super cartoonish to Looney toons standard. But by no means do they not stand on having those kinds of wacky kinds of feats. Going to an example to compare to. Peter had some one time feats. But since his show tends to break away from reality a lot, having such wacky feats like his Regen, and other gags, he tends to keep them. Homer has it general to a similar degree. Grabbing onto light isn't the strangest thing they have done.
I guess in some parts it makes sense but I guess Ant says otherwise. ._.
 
Being left open for when the Beer explosion feat to be discussed after getting calced. And then nothing else unless something pops up
 
While Ant is right for the most part, since S10 the show drastically changed and its rules are less strict now.

For instance, Moleman has even died a couple times and he's always back without explanation. He even came back after getting eaten without any trace of his body left.

So I think it's not a mistake to add Toon Force feats since the show is pretty much that at this point. Like Lady Gaga's sixth sense, or the immortality of some characters.
 
Well, I trust Calaca's sense of judgement.
 
Thanks. I'll look after another example to see if we can add NPI to Homer's profile with more justification than just a one-time feat in order to be as accurate as possible.
 
Btw are we allowed to add Treehouse of horror versions even though it is non canon. And why was God's(The Simpsons) profile deleted?
 
No, ToH specials aren't allowed to add feats for the characters. You might add the exclusive characters but you can't scale the canon cast to them.
 
I think that we had too little to go by to rate the profile properly.
 
Yes. Simpsons God is too little in terms of feat. We don't even get a good sense on what powers he would have.


which is a shame cause technically Ned Flanders has summoned him through the show in canon before
 
so just curious can composite god from the simpsons be considerd multiversal for creating the treehouse of horror universes the many couch gags all of the individual comic universes the games and the main series?
 
Yes. Also due to the fact in the game. He created Matt who created the Game System which contained a multiverse of countless universes
 
Buttersamuri said:
Yes. Also due to the fact in the game. He created Matt who created the Game System which contained a multiverse of countless universes
Wait Wait WAIT Composite got denied right so why bring it up?
 
Someone just hasn't made it. Lisa has skills notable that others may not have. So would take a good bit to make one. Nobody has cared to do it yet.
 
So you don't get off derailing. Make a thread on it. I definitely think there are certain things of Lisa that should be discussed where to place
 
Is there anything left to do here, and if so, what?
 
The talk of Toon force should probably be discussed if we are to continue anything here. Since Toon force based feats is something they share a lot of in the recent seasons since past seasons 10.
 
i wonder if we can use feats from the tracey ullman show shorts because they have a good number of toonforce feats there
 
Umm. Would that count as Vaporizing? that seems like it would qualify under it considering the situation. Bare minimum I'll do a calc on it wth Pulverized end. But vaporize seems usable
 
Back
Top