Sonic vs Saitama

[Sonicflare9]

Saitama

Saitama is a human from Z-City who; through rigorous (sort of) training broke through his human limiters and achieved unbelievable strength and abilities. Never breaking a sweat, the name One Punch Man is fitting for the effortless wins Saitama has achieved through the series. Never going beyond...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Sonic the Hedgehog (Archie Post-Genesis Wave)

Sonic the Hedgehog is a hedgehog gifted with the power of super-sonic speed, and the ability to control the power of the Chaos Emeralds. Considered by many to be the hero of the world, he has opposed the villainous reign of the evil Dr. Eggman and his Eggman Empire since his early childhood...

vsbattles.fandom.com

post training and werehog sonic

speed equalized

whooooooooooooooooooo would win

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Post Genesis Base Sonic High 6-A+ (and misses baseline 5-C by a hair iirc), and Werehog Sonic scales far above Base Sonic in AP & Durability.

Saitama, on the other hand, is At least High 6-A but it's unknown how high into High 6-A he is, so Sonic probably one shots. Also Sonic should be more skilled than Saitama

 

[ElixirBlue]

Skill, fighting experience pulled from Pre-Genesis Wave, and Speed.

Voting for Post Sonic.

 

[GlaceonGamez471]

Sonic one punches the one punch man FRA

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Sonic FRA if it isn't a stomp

 

[Sonicflare9]

bump

 

[Oleggator]

Sonic FRA

 

[FinePoint]

Post Genesis Base Sonic High 6-A+ (and misses baseline 5-C by a hair iirc), and Werehog Sonic scales far above Base Sonic in AP & Durability.

Saitama, on the other hand, is At least High 6-A but it's unknown how high into High 6-A he is, so Sonic probably one shots. Also Sonic should be more skilled than Saitama

If I remember correctly, it was agreed upon in a different thread that Saitama is likely at least 10x stronger than his best feat, due to it being completely effortless, in combination with Boros stating that it "Wasn't even a fight, I didn't stand a chance."

 

[Realjackthegamer312]

Following.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

If I remember correctly, it was agreed upon in a different thread that Saitama is likely at least 10x stronger than his best feat, due to it being completely effortless, in combination with Boros stating that it "Wasn't even a fight, I didn't stand a chance."

Why exactly 10 times? Since defeating someone effortlessly doesn't necessarily mean you're 10 times stronger (or any set multiplier for that matter. In some verses, such as Dragon Ball, you can shitstomp someone which just 2 times difference in AP)

 

[FinePoint]

Why exactly 10 times? Since defeating someone effortlessly doesn't necessarily mean you're 10 times stronger (or any set multiplier for that matter. In some verses, such as Dragon Ball, you can shitstomp someone which just 2 times difference in AP)

I didn't make the number, I just remember reading it, I wish I also remembered which thread I read it on. I've also read Dragon Ball has inconsistent scaling, but I don't know if that's true. For the sake of this thread, let's just decide: how much stronger should someone be to defeat someone effortlessly, realistically, and how much stronger than Saitama is Sonic exactly?

Most 13 year olds can't lift their own weight which averages at 100lb, but the typical 200lb man can deadlift up to 335lb. After 13 I'd say it becomes a lot less effortless, so that gives us at least 3x in real life very roughly, not accounting for skill (since Saitama has none according to everyone in-verse.)

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I feel like this is a complete stomp, also saitama is gonna be upgraded high into High 6-A due to a new CRSC calc, however that cry hasn't come yet. But even so, I feel this is a stomp regardless

 

[FinePoint]

I feel like this is a complete stomp, also saitama is gonna be upgraded high into High 6-A due to a new CRSC calc, however that cry hasn't come yet. But even so, I feel this is a stomp regardless

That's true, this should probably wait anyways. But I'm still curious how much stronger Sonic is. You need to be 7.5x stronger than your opponent to one-shot in VS battles.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Doesn't sonic hax stomp tho

 

[FinePoint]

Doesn't sonic hax stomp tho

Probably.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

sonic is apparently 16.7 exatons

 

[FinePoint]

Alright. Let's all forget this thread until the CRSC recalc, and for Saitama to probably get resistance to time-manip in the upcoming manga chapters.

 

[TyranoDoom30]

Sonic FRA

 

[Planck69]

I didn't make the number, I just remember reading it, I wish I also remembered which thread I read it on. I've also read Dragon Ball has inconsistent scaling, but I don't know if that's true. For the sake of this thread, let's just decide: how much stronger should someone be to defeat someone effortlessly, realistically, and how much stronger than Saitama is Sonic exactly?

Most 13 year olds can't lift their own weight which averages at 100lb, but the typical 200lb man can deadlift up to 335lb. After 13 I'd say it becomes a lot less effortless, so that gives us at least 3x in real life very roughly, not accounting for skill (since Saitama has none according to everyone in-verse.)

Thing is, there's no set power gap in fiction necessary to beat someone effortlessly (it could be a 30% difference or a 5 times difference). So we don't just arbitrarily make up a multiplier when we don't know.

 

[Planck69]

Anyway, Sonic FRA.

This can be redone if necessary.

 

[FinePoint]

Thing is, there's no set power gap in fiction necessary to beat someone effortlessly (it could be a 30% difference or a 5 times difference). So we don't just arbitrarily make up a multiplier when we don't know.

But isn't it also very dishonest to make battles with characters whose only feats were effortless, since their power isn't actually known, only its bare minimum in that case?

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

This match is a stomp is it not? As of now, Sonic one-shots Saitama, even if Saitama massively scales above 183 petatons

 

[Planck69]

But isn't it also very dishonest to make battles with characters whose only feats were effortless, since their power isn't actually known, only its bare minimum in that case?

How is it dishonest? We acknowledge that it was effortless when comparing them. We also don't put up random multipliers without feats. Unless you want to match ban these characters.

 

[FinePoint]

How is it dishonest? We acknowledge that it was effortless when comparing them. We also don't put up random multipliers without feats. Unless you want to match ban these characters.

It's dishonest because you're arguing that one character will beat another character whom you don't actually know the strength of. That's why I like fights with Saitama's pre-training key better.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

But his pre-trainig self kinda sucks tho

 

[Planck69]

It's dishonest because you're arguing that one character will beat another character whom you don't actually know the strength of. That's why I like fights with Saitama's pre-training key better.

We do know his strength. he's casually X. That means he upscales from X to a certain degree. It could be a 1,000,000x difference or it could just be significantly stronger but still in the same range. Seeing as the latter is the safer assumption, we go with that.

 

[FinePoint]

We do know his strength. he's casually X. That means he upscales from X to a certain degree. It could be a 1,000,000x difference or it could just be significantly stronger but still in the same range. Seeing as the latter is the safer assumption, we go with that.

Just feels... meaningless to me. "If you assume Saitama is comparable to his minimum feats, then X could beat him." Idk, might just be me.

 

[Planck69]

He scales above his feats. Like many other characters. He just scales higher above them than others. He could be stronger than that but for the purposes of a vs debate, we really can't make any unfounded assumptions.

 

[Sonicflare9]

bump

 

[sanicspood]

why did u bump this this is literally a stomp

bump

 

[manu_zarri]

why did u bump this this is literally a stomp

and a necro*

 

[ElixirBlue]

and a necro*

Still think it’s too short for to be called a Nerco but stomp

 

[FinePoint]

and a necro*

Two months is not a necro.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

It's only a necro after 3 months

 

[FinePoint]

It's only a necro after 3 months

There's actually not a written time period on this wiki so far as I can find, perhaps we should get one added.

 

[manu_zarri]

Two months is not a necro.

there is writed 3 months. though 1 is enough for close a theard