- 32,359
- 20,298
I already showed you in the beginning of this thread, this is exactly what I mean. It's like you're looking at a wholly different game.
All your arguments have been addressed from the start. We scale from power-source absorption all the time. Stop bringing up arguments that have been answered, debunked, or have no correlation with the wiki.
And I explained why the destruction would be High 6-A at least, it would cover the whole globe. Doesn't mean it would disintegrate the planet.
All your arguments have been addressed from the start. We scale from power-source absorption all the time. Stop bringing up arguments that have been answered, debunked, or have no correlation with the wiki.
And I explained why the destruction would be High 6-A at least, it would cover the whole globe. Doesn't mean it would disintegrate the planet.