- 12,239
- 1,112
I never said that wasn't the case, all I said is nothing in this fight was instant and a punch should be enough to kill opposed to a charged kamehameha.
I never said it'd happen.
I never said it'd happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When was able to TP somebody to his level so fast?Anonimoe7875 said:Because Ness can mind hax with a thought while Goku need to move which take morre time.Trndo said:This is trueTheJ-ManRequiem said:Well technically speaking nothing in this fight is instant, does he even need a kamehaneha? A single punch or ki blast should be enough.
TheJ-ManRequiem said:I never said that wasn't the case, all I said is nothing in this fight was instant and a punch should be enough to kill opposed to a charged kamehameha.
I never said it'd happen.
Why would you be higher tier for killing a 3A with hax....?Trndo said:If ness can really instantly kill goku with a thought then Ness should be higher tier and this is a mismatch
Gargoyle One said:Why would you be higher tier for killing a 3A with hax....?Trndo said:If ness can really instantly kill goku with a thought then Ness should be higher tier and this is a mismatch
Gargoyle One said:Goku doesn't have Universal+ durability
Make a content revision thread, good luck.Trndo said:He should
Ninja'd :^)Paulo.junior.969 said:Make a content revision thread, good luck.
Not really? I mean, sure Ness can mindhax like EVERYONE ELSE KEEPS SAYING, but also remember that Goku can basically 1-shot Ness if he gets a hit on. If Ness does pretty much anything other than to prevent Goku from immediately unleashing an AoE super blast then I'm pretty sure he's dead.Noahkaismith said:Can you provide better reasoning?Akreious said:So goku is willing to kill. Goku goes SSB Kaioken, he gets blinded by Ness but just senses Ness' energy and blasts him.
Infinite times above High 3-A, wich is Infinite times above regular 3-A.Paulo.junior.969 said:Isn't Low 2-C infinite times above 3-A?