• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Small change about God in One-Punch Man

Hello there, I've been a huge fan of the One-Punch Man verse and I've noticed a small mistake when it comes to God from One-Punch Man in VS Battles. Unfortunately, I cannot edit any page when it comes to the One-Punch Man verse, because I don't have the right to do so.

Basically, it says that God's tier is "At least 4-A", nothing more, which isn't entirely wrong, but I'd make a small change.

If God gave Garou a fraction of his actual powers and effortlessly took them away, shouldn't God automatically scale way higher than Cosmic Garou?

God's tier should still be at least 4-A, nothing wrong with that, but please put "likely higher" next to it. So then, it shall be "At least 4-A, likely higher."
 
I mean, At least already covers does it not? Likely would only be there if there is uncertainty about him being higher than he is, but we already certainly know that.
 
'At least' is already sufficient for this.
Well, if that's the case, Saitama being "likely higher" should be removed as well, since he'll be fighting God at the end of the series. He'll inevitably be higher than 4-A, no need to put "likely higher" next to it. Emirp sumitpo agrees as well.
 
Back
Top