Significance of history and destructive potential in a certain level of forces

[NikHelton]

Like I said before a valid LS feat in my opinion should be performed continuously. I don't think I have much more to add to this. This is only a mater of how many people agree with me.

As it has been pointed out already striking a baseball would output an absolutely huge amount of force. This will only last for a small fraction of a second but this is all in takes to launch it. No human on Earth is able to lift its weight equivalent regardless of how good their stamina is

That are you think about AP part?

 

[NikHelton]

Bump

 

[Ugarik]

I agree with Clover about the AP part. Moreover even if the assume that outliers can occur frequently as long as they are of a similar nature it would be very difficult to make up a consistend rule to exclude them from powerscaling

 

[NikHelton]

ok, in that case, are we changing the approach only for LS?

 

[Ugarik]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

 

[Damage3245]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

A separate thread focused specifically on that would probably be best.

 

[NikHelton]

Вероятно, лучше всего было бы создать отдельную тему, посвященную этому вопросу.

What are you think about AP part?

 

[Antvasima]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

A separate thread focused specifically on that would probably be best.

If every other suggestion here has been rejected, that seems like a good idea.

@Ugarik

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

If every other suggestion here has been rejected, that seems like a good idea.

@Ugarik

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

A separate thread focused specifically on that would probably be best.

If every other suggestion here has been rejected, that seems like a good idea.

@Ugarik

We seem to need your help here.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

@Ugarik

We seem to need your help here.

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

A separate thread focused specifically on that would probably be best.

Are there other members than @Ugarik here who are willing and able to handle this please?

Also, can somebody provide an overview summary of what we currently need to do here please?

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

It appears most of the staff agreed with my suggestion regarding LS but we haven't made a conclusion and it doesn't look like we ever are going to in this thread. Do I need to create another thread since NikHelton's original idea was rejected?

A separate thread focused specifically on that would probably be best.

@Ugarik @Damage3245 @CloverDragon03 @Planck69 @Mr. Bambu @Deagonx @Qawsedf234 @LordGriffin1000 @DarkDragonMedeus @DontTalkDT

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

"Agreed with Bambu regarding lifting strength, but agree with Clover on everything else" appears to still be my unchanged stance.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, if Ugarik is unwilling to create a new discussion thread, it seems like this one has mostly been rejected, so it might be best if we close it.