- 10,342
- 11,894
There's no discussion rule about this topic, nor a note on the verse page or Zeus' profileAlso the Zeus argument and anime argument have been rejected numerous times. Hence the discussion rule and why this should be closed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's no discussion rule about this topic, nor a note on the verse page or Zeus' profileAlso the Zeus argument and anime argument have been rejected numerous times. Hence the discussion rule and why this should be closed.
That will be a mistake, let me try and find the thread
A starry sky where they are fighting is shown several times (which is the sky).Whether heaven is a universe or a planet has been like the main topic of crossverse RoR scalings and the one page being a mistranslation isn't all that convincing tbh. It denies it as evidence of heaven being a planet but doesn't necessarily prove it being a universe.
The CRT is not just for 3-A, there is also 4-A which is because of the starry sky in valhallaWhether heaven is a universe or a planet has been like the main topic of crossverse RoR scalings and the one page being a mistranslation isn't all that convincing tbh. It denies it as evidence of heaven being a planet but doesn't necessarily prove it being a universe.
The issue isn't whether Heaven is in a separate space from earth but whether heaven refers to the planet/planets gods live on or the entire space they live in.A starry sky where they are fighting is shown several times (which is the sky).
The worlds are placed as equal which means that Midgard is not just Earth since it is not 4-A in size. In the titanomachy Zeus and his father fought somewhere in the Milky Way
BTW I'm leaning towards disagreeing. The evidence and arguments presented are pretty weakSounds pretty reasonable at first look but it's kinda iffy.
As others have said, we have no confirmation of the chibi thingy being canon, and the series doesn't follow the mythologies 90% of the time.
Whether heaven is a universe or a planet has been like the main topic of crossverse RoR scalings and the one page being a mistranslation isn't all that convincing tbh. It denies it as evidence of heaven being a planet but doesn't necessarily prove it being a universe.
So I'm neutral for now.
Buddha once called heaven the universeThe issue isn't whether Heaven is in a separate space from earth but whether heaven refers to the planet/planets gods live on or the entire space they live in.
Buddha once called heaven the universe
Buddha once called heaven the universe
Uhm, this is a massive AP revision for an entire mainstream verse. Like it literally affects everyone. The rules sayWill 1 admin vote be enough for this topic to be accepted?
AndIn order to ensure that all revisions are thoroughly reviewed and approved, it is necessary for a minimum of two staff members to sign off on any proposed changes.
In cases where the series verse has a significant following or a large amount of material has been published based on its content, it may be necessary to seek approval from a minimum of three staff members to ensure that all relevant parties are aware of and agree with the proposed revisions.
Why? It literally does not call the heavens a universe. Like, at allThis panel alone convinces me of 3-A
Alr then, I think we need two admins left. Looks like DDM has already agreed on this issueUhm, this is a massive AP revision for an entire mainstream verse. Like it literally affects everyone. The rules say
And
No idea why, but a bunch of new people came in randomly saying they agree, so...This has been rejected already, why is it still open
?This has been rejected already, why is it still open
That is what I also do not understandNo idea why, but a bunch of new people came in randomly saying they agree, so...
Honestly this verse barely has enough to it to support planet level, never mind Multi-Solar System or Universal
Here you go, it is a surprise there is no discussion rule against this already.?
Where was the issue rejected, people are reading and voting on discussions in this thread, so.. if there is a thread where this topic has been downvoted recently, post it
No idea why, but a bunch of new people came in randomly saying they agree, so...
That is what I also do not understand
No what would not be fair is having to argue the same thing over and over again. I literally have no strength left to tackle this subject again like I used to. Why? I see it all the time and I am no longer interested in it at this point. So there should have been a discussion rule.Okay, I understand that threads have been opened about this topic before, but there is no existing rule, which means this topic can continue now (So I think)
EDIT: And it would be really unfair to throw this thread away when we have one super admin vote.
No what would not be fair is having to argue the same thing over and over again. I literally have no strength left to tackle this subject again like I used to. Why? I see it all the time and I am no longer interested in it at this point. So there should have been a discussion rule.
These verse do not even have a solid 5-B feat to even begin with, so it gets weird when I am seeing claims of universal RoR
Please go and create a thread for this, don't confuse this topic any more than necessary.No what would not be fair is having to argue the same thing over and over again. I literally have no strength left to tackle this subject again like I used to. Why? I see it all the time and I am no longer interested in it at this point. So there should have been a discussion rule.
frfr tempest is my goat
çok konuştun aslanActually this has become really common with crt's lately, in content revisions where there is no member or members with knowledge of the verse, the OP's suggestion is accepted unquestioningly by a bunch of random new members and sometimes even applied to profiles with staff approval. I mean, there were times in the past in crt's when peoples behaved this way because it was difficult for a new member (myself included when I first joined) to accurately assess the practical applications in fiction, even if they knew the wiki standards, but the situation was manageable, whereas now, regardless of this crt, in many crt's you can see new members, sometimes as many as 5-6 people, saying "I agree" to the OP without providing any arguments.
çok konuştun aslan
The VS Battle Wiki is an English-language platform, and all users are required to communicate in English.
Still nothing.Could someone PLEASE show me the evidence that heaven is a universe?
Interesting. It's the wiki we may never see it
Don't tempt mePlease go and create a thread for this,
This is the place for this topic though.don't confuse this topic any more than necessary.
okDon't tempt me
no, go and find a rule or something to back up what you're saying, I don't really care as long as there's nothing official about itThis is the place for this topic though.