- 479
- 318
But its only +1 dimension to his Level.I'm agree with this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But its only +1 dimension to his Level.I'm agree with this
After what if? immersive story comes, you have to understand it againBut its only +1 dimension to his Level.
You didn't resist anything, did you?It would be better to open a separate CRT instead of discussing it here
Literally just make the crt and if people disagree they will talk about it there it’s not something to discuss in a thread for a characterYou didn't resist anything, did you?
I dont understand...After what if? immersive story comes, you have to understand it again
I've created a CRT about this. What is your opinion?It would be better to open a separate CRT instead of discussing it here
I've created a CRT about this. What is your opinion?Literally just make the crt and if people disagree they will talk about it there it’s not something to discuss in a thread for a character
She-Hulk interacting with K.E.V.I.N. is an automatic disqualifier for R>F on its own. In addition the MCU is "data" to KEVIN, which also disqualifies him from R>F since data isn't an unreal in comparison, just smaller.1-A and above stuff iirc requires R>F interactions with said “fictional” characters not being able to interact with “reality”. Since KEVIN was mentioned, just gotta ask, did She Hulk interact with him and access the real world by herself or through outside help I don’t recall.
Its notWait WHAT? Why MCU is Low 1-A?
It’s not she got there from an error and she can’t get back and literally treats everything as fiction to it’s meta stuff for a reasonShe-Hulk interacting with K.E.V.I.N. is an automatic disqualifier for R>F on its own. In addition the MCU is "data" to KEVIN, which also disqualifies him from R>F since data isn't an unreal in comparison, just smaller.
That's an automatic disqualifier Dark. End of story. Its also not fiction from KEVIN, since he's manipulating data, which is how he fixes it in the end.It’s not she got there form an error and she literally treats everything as fiction to it’s meta stuff for a reason
Wrong it doesn’t disqualify anything as the mcu is literally stated to have reality fictionThat's an automatic disqualifier Dark. End of story. Its also not fiction from KEVIN, since he's manipulating data, which is how he fixes it in the end.
For the thread I watched the video and Wanda is easily overpowered and then depowered by five of the six stones. Meaning she doesn't scale to the full gauntlet. So I'm against a Low 1-C upgrade.
mean u agree?For the thread the most SW would be is Low 1-C if she scales to the Stone's full powers.
No he doesn’t he just denied it because he always lowballs everything even tho she literally did and would’ve did a feat that scalesmean u agree?
I don't understand, just because the timeline creation is supposed to be low1-c and she was attacked by gem power doesn't mean she shouldn't have any scale. She didn't even die in that attack, so why don't you agree?For the thread I watched the video and Wanda is easily overpowered and then depowered by five of the six stones. Meaning she doesn't scale to the full gauntlet. So I'm against a Low 1-C upgrade.
It contradicts main-canon. Since the Watcher, who's only 5D, is infinitely more powerful than Dormammu. There's no High 1-C upgrade to be had.what do you think about Dormammu 11 D? It has been confirmed by the official 2 times.
You're wrong. This has been brought up and rejected for the exact reasons I've mentioned. K.E.V.I.N. doesn't meet the unrealness and lack of interaction criteria for the 1-A R>F.Wrong
She was doing so with the stones, meaning its not her, and she's completely depowered by five of them.What are you talking about Wanda was literally going to re shape the Yggdrasil tree that’s more then enough to show she scales
Not completely. She'd only be Low 1-C with all six stones. She herself wouldn't scale to that value since she's depowered by five and requires them all to do her plan in the first place.mean u agree?
Creating the transinfinite number of multiverses is Low 1-C. Not a single timeline or multiverse in of itself.just because the timeline creation is supposed to be low1-c
It was but then it was suggested that KEVIN be upgraded to 1-A and Dormammu/everyone be moved to High 1-C and 1-B. Neither of which I find to qualify.Isn’t this thread just to get the stats for a new wanda profile?
Yeah I'm good with that.Low 1-C scaling to the stones when she has them is fine if it’s specified that it’s with the stones
Then no one should low1-c infinity ultron either, he had the stone completely removed from his body and he is not low1-c if you think like thatNot completely. She'd only be Low 1-C with all six stones. She herself wouldn't scale to that value since she's depowered by five and requires them all to do her plan in the first place.
What are you talking about Ultron isn’t his tier now because he did it with the stones stop saying nonsense man obviously if someone gets powered up by the stones then they are that tier even if they weren’t beforeShe was doing so with the stones, meaning its not her, and she's completely depowered by five of them.
this is wrong I explained in the dormammu threadIt contradicts main-canon. Since the Watcher, who's only 5D, is infinitely more powerful than Dormammu. There's no High 1-C upgrade to be had.
Ultron without the stones isn't Low 1-C. He needed all six to be a threat to the Watcher and once he got them all back he was going to kill everyone with his full power. Additionally a beefed up Strange Supreme got decked by an Infinity Gauntlet and the Stones have always been the strongest power source seen outside of K.E.V.I.N.Then no one should low1-c infinity ultron either, he had the gem completely removed from his body and he is not low1-c if you think like that
Yes he is. He's Low 1-C because he's powered entirely by the stones.What are you talking about Ultron isn’t his tier now because he did it with the stones
You were outvoted heavily if I'm thinking of the same thread.this is wrong I explained in the dormammu thread
Yeah meaning she gets the tier by the same reasoningYes he is. He's Low 1-C because he's powered entirely by the stones.
Outvoted? The thread was literally made like an hour ago with 3 replies in itYou were outvoted heavily if I'm thinking of the same thread.
I said that she could be Low 1-C with the stones. She's just not Low 1-C naturally.Yeah meaning she gets the tier by the same reasoning
I had a different thread in mind.Outvoted? The thread was literally made like an hour ago with 3 replies in it
No you literally said that was with the stones so she doesn’t scale disagree with upgrade just admit you said something goofy instead of defending itI said that she could be Low 1-C with the stones. She's just not Low 1-C naturally.
That's I'm i sayingI said that she could be Low 1-C with the stones. She's just not Low 1-C naturally.
Maybe you should read what I say next timeNo you literally said that was with the stones so she doesn’t scale disagree with upgrade
For the thread the most SW would be is Low 1-C if she scales to the Stone's full powers.
Not completely. She'd only be Low 1-C with all six stones. She herself wouldn't scale to that value since she's depowered by five and requires them all to do her plan in the first place.
I've said multiple times she'd be Low 1-C with the stones, just not Low 1-C without them.For the thread I said she wouldn't get Low 1-C without the stones, since she required them per your opening for her plan and was depowered with just five of them. Meaning her power < stones power.
Again I read just fine admit you said something goofy instead of defending the upgrade is to get her to 1c you said no infinity Wanda isn’t 1c because she did with infinity stones and disagree like op even says he’s talking about infinity Wanda you said noMaybe you should read what I say next time
Wanda isn't Low 1-C. She needs the infinity stones to be Low 1-C.infinity Wanda isn’t 1c because she did with infinity stones
But before she gets the infinity stone, she can do almost everything like the watcherWanda isn't Low 1-C. She needs the infinity stones to be Low 1-C.
Yeah so why do you disagree with op then ? infinity Wanda scalesWanda isn't Low 1-C. She needs the infinity stones to be Low 1-C.
That wouldn't make her Low 1-C. You'd need to show her changing Loki's tree under her own power or something along those lines to get Low 1-C.But before she gets the infinity stone, she can do almost everything like the watcher
I disagreed with them scaling a base Wanda to Low 1-C.Yeah so why do you disagree with op then ?
Who is scaling her base to that level ? Obviously she’s only that level with stonesI disagreed with them scaling a base Wanda to Low 1-C.
The OPWho is scaling her base to that level ?
But before she gets the infinity stone,
No one said base wanda low1-cI disagreed with them scaling a base Wanda to Low 1-C.
I'm just referring to her abilities like the watcherThe OP
But you did. Like right before you said "Before the stones" meaning base Wanda.No one said base wanda low1-c
I get you mean now, you were talking about just powers she'd get. In that case she'd get what she's shown to do, dunno if she'd qualify for the Watcher's physical traits like being Acasual 4 as an example. But she may qualify for an extra tabber when/if you make the page.I'm just referring to her abilities like the watcher
I composed the wrong words, I apologize.But you did. Like right before you said "Before the stones" meaning base Wanda.
You can see her looking at a shard of glass (another universe), which is probably a dimension outside the multiverse that she uses to view stories. To find a solution to her absolute pointI get you mean now, you were talking about just powers she'd get. In that case she'd get what she's shown to do, dunno if she'd qualify for the Watcher's physical traits like being Acasual 4 as an example. But she may qualify for an extra tabber when/if you make the page.