- 460
- 309
But its only +1 dimension to his Level.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
scarlet witch new profile
- Thread starter Yokoahh5743
- Start date
- Status
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #42
After what if? immersive story comes, you have to understand it again
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #43
You didn't resist anything, did you?
- 2,648
- 644
Literally just make the crt and if people disagree they will talk about it there it’s not something to discuss in a thread for a character
- 460
- 309
I dont understand...
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #46
I've created a CRT about this. What is your opinion?
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #47
I've created a CRT about this. What is your opinion?
- 20,541
- 17,454
She-Hulk interacting with K.E.V.I.N. is an automatic disqualifier for R>F on its own. In addition the MCU is "data" to KEVIN, which also disqualifies him from R>F since data isn't an unreal in comparison, just smaller.
Its not
For the thread the most SW would be is Low 1-C if she scales to the Stone's full powers.
- 2,648
- 644
It’s not she got there from an error and she can’t get back and literally treats everything as fiction to it’s meta stuff for a reason
- 20,541
- 17,454
That's an automatic disqualifier Dark. End of story. Its also not fiction from KEVIN, since he's manipulating data, which is how he fixes it in the end.
For the thread I watched the video and Wanda is easily overpowered and then depowered by five of the six stones. Meaning she doesn't scale to the full gauntlet. So I'm against a Low 1-C upgrade.
- 2,648
- 644
Wrong it doesn’t disqualify anything as the mcu is literally stated to have reality fiction
What are you talking about Wanda was literally going to re shape the Yggdrasil tree that’s more then enough to show she scales
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #52
mean u agree?
- 2,648
- 644
No he doesn’t he just denied it because he always lowballs everything even tho she literally did and would’ve did a feat that scales
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #54
I don't understand, just because the timeline creation is supposed to be low1-c and she was attacked by gem power doesn't mean she shouldn't have any scale. She didn't even die in that attack, so why don't you agree?
- 20,541
- 17,454
It contradicts main-canon. Since the Watcher, who's only 5D, is infinitely more powerful than Dormammu. There's no High 1-C upgrade to be had.
You're wrong. This has been brought up and rejected for the exact reasons I've mentioned. K.E.V.I.N. doesn't meet the unrealness and lack of interaction criteria for the 1-A R>F.
She was doing so with the stones, meaning its not her, and she's completely depowered by five of them.
Not completely. She'd only be Low 1-C with all six stones. She herself wouldn't scale to that value since she's depowered by five and requires them all to do her plan in the first place.
- 20,541
- 17,454
Creating the transinfinite number of multiverses is Low 1-C. Not a single timeline or multiverse in of itself.
For the thread I said she wouldn't get Low 1-C without the stones, since she required them per your opening for her plan and was depowered with just five of them. Meaning her power < stones power.
- 4,769
- 7,810
Isn’t this thread just to get the stats for a new wanda profile? Low 1-C scaling to the stones when she has them is fine if it’s specified that it’s with the stones
- 20,541
- 17,454
It was but then it was suggested that KEVIN be upgraded to 1-A and Dormammu/everyone be moved to High 1-C and 1-B. Neither of which I find to qualify.
Yeah I'm good with that.
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #59
Then no one should low1-c infinity ultron either, he had the stone completely removed from his body and he is not low1-c if you think like that
- 2,648
- 644
What are you talking about Ultron isn’t his tier now because he did it with the stones stop saying nonsense man obviously if someone gets powered up by the stones then they are that tier even if they weren’t before
this is wrong I explained in the dormammu thread
- 20,541
- 17,454
Ultron without the stones isn't Low 1-C. He needed all six to be a threat to the Watcher and once he got them all back he was going to kill everyone with his full power. Additionally a beefed up Strange Supreme got decked by an Infinity Gauntlet and the Stones have always been the strongest power source seen outside of K.E.V.I.N.
Yes he is. He's Low 1-C because he's powered entirely by the stones.
You were outvoted heavily if I'm thinking of the same thread.
- 2,648
- 644
Yeah meaning she gets the tier by the same reasoning
Outvoted? The thread was literally made like an hour ago with 3 replies in it
Like you haven’t been making any sense with anything your saying sense you been in this thread
- 20,541
- 17,454
I said that she could be Low 1-C with the stones. She's just not Low 1-C naturally.
I had a different thread in mind.
- 2,648
- 644
No you literally said that was with the stones so she doesn’t scale disagree with upgrade
just admit you said something goofy instead of defending it
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #65
That's I'm i saying
- 20,541
- 17,454
Maybe you should read what I say next timeNo you literally said that was with the stones so she doesn’t scale disagree with upgrade
I've said multiple times she'd be Low 1-C with the stones, just not Low 1-C without them.
- 2,648
- 644
Again I read just fine admit you said something goofy instead of defending the upgrade is to get her to 1c you said no infinity Wanda isn’t 1c because she did with infinity stones and disagree like op even says he’s talking about infinity Wanda you said no
- 20,541
- 17,454
Wanda isn't Low 1-C. She needs the infinity stones to be Low 1-C.
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #69
But before she gets the infinity stone, she can do almost everything like the watcher
- 2,648
- 644
Yeah so why do you disagree with op then ? infinity Wanda scales
- 20,541
- 17,454
That wouldn't make her Low 1-C. You'd need to show her changing Loki's tree under her own power or something along those lines to get Low 1-C.
I disagreed with them scaling a base Wanda to Low 1-C.
- 2,648
- 644
Who is scaling her base to that level ? Obviously she’s only that level with stones
- 20,541
- 17,454
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #74
No one said base wanda low1-c
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #75
I'm just referring to her abilities like the watcher
- 2,648
- 644
Yeah I don’t where he keeps getting base Wanda is 1c
- 20,541
- 17,454
But you did. Like right before you said "Before the stones" meaning base Wanda.
I get you mean now, you were talking about just powers she'd get. In that case she'd get what she's shown to do, dunno if she'd qualify for the Watcher's physical traits like being Acasual 4 as an example. But she may qualify for an extra tabber when/if you make the page.
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #78
I composed the wrong words, I apologize.
- 951
- 180
- Thread starter
- #79
You can see her looking at a shard of glass (another universe), which is probably a dimension outside the multiverse that she uses to view stories. To find a solution to her absolute point
- 241
- 107
FentyBeauty/sandboxwanda
vsbattles.fandom.com
im working on a sandbox for her rn
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
