• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Small Upgrade for Scarlet Witch's physicals

Status
Not open for further replies.
Genuinely, how is this a ******* thread? He read 49 issues total out of 1400 and is basing his feats off that, he straight up hid the fact that a character is 5-B possibly 3-C when it was 9-A (whatever jank logic he gives DOES NOT matter when he fails to ******* mention it at all in the OP and only does so when I call him out on it), he knows the tiering is faulty for a general tier and yet he refuses to propose a key because "it's too much work", the supporting feats are TWO RANDOM PANELS that contextually don't even represent the shit he's saying it is, and his actual admitted obsession for this upgrade is he wanted Wanda to physically stomp Poppy Playtime or some shit.

I am ******* bewildered this thread is even getting entertained, he straight up did shit here that's actually manipulative beyond what we allow.
Impress, please chill.
Es, even if you throw out the fact that the feat is shaky on its own, with anti magic properties being beyond ass, this feat still doesn’t make any sense. Either Wanda becomes 5-B, or she doesn’t. Throw it out entirely, mate. It is a very definition of an outlier.
 
Also let's ******* address this whole idea about "oh the writer didn't know who Scylla was"
rifi8v.webp


He straight up does, he corroborates that is in fact the same character from Fearless Defenders (Which, THIS is exactly how vs. debaters ruin comic scalings)

zi6gdk.webp


THIS IS THE LEVEL OF SHIT SHE WAS DOING IN FEARLESS DEFENDERS
 
So should we close this thread now? 🙏
 
Yes, because I was initially under the assumption that the proposal would eventually lead Es giving a clear keying proposal but it's apparent to me now he is entirely disinterested in it and just wants to promote nonsense stats off of 3 hapless staff members he wooed with false scans.

This isn't a subjective thread, nothing here is "up to vote", he clearly failed to meet the burden of proof.

Close this thread and make a better one next time, and don't cherrypick like this ever again.
 
Yes. Unreliably statistics-boosting efforts should always be avoided.

I have closed this thread. 🙏
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top