• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Saitama Revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
ZacharyGrossman273

ZacharyGrossman273

24,183
3,938
Okay this have been bothering me for a long time. Yes, he is stronger than anything else in his verse by a lot. But the Low end to high end ratio for planet level is times 47. I propose we get rid of the "unknown" AND the "possibly far higher" and just have "At least Planet level".

Him being stronger than anyone in his own verse doesen't mean anything considering how many characters are peerless in theeir own verse who don't get a possible far higher rating.
 
Well, someone unlock Zeno, Popeye, Chronos so I may add the ratings since the majority agreed on it & no one is adding the ratings for their profiles right now.
 
Magi RobloxG said:
Agreed.
Click to expand...
If you agreed with this, then why did you just change all of Adam Conover's stats to "Possibly far higher." for seemingly similar reasons to Saitama's rating? Inluding adding that to his physical stats, which makes no sense at all.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Adam_Conover?diff=prev&oldid=1268302

Also please do not change a character's stats this drastically without first creating a Content Revision Thread or consulting other staff members first.
 
That still doesn't answer why you changed the page like that. This is a warning to not do that to pages again. Especially if you edited like that as some sort of joke.
 
Ryukama said:
That still doesn't answer why you changed the page like that. This is a warning to not do that to pages again. Especially if you edited like that as some sort of joke.
Click to expand...
It wasn't a joke, the majority agreed on it and I thought that was allowed.
 
Agreed where? Because I cannot find a Content Revision Thread on that matter.
 
Ryukama said:
Agreed where? Because I cannot find a Content Revision Thread on that matter.
Click to expand...
@Loyal mentioned about the profiles and the majority agreed since it was also related to this thread.
 
Magi RobloxG said:
Well, someone unlock Zeno, Popeye, Chronos so I may add the ratings since the majority agreed on it & no one is adding the ratings for their profiles right now.
Click to expand...
This thread isn't about giving the "possibly far higher" to all the characters listed, it's about taking it away from Saitama
 
No. They agreed that if those profiles don't have a "possibly far higher", then neither should Saitama. Not that those profiles should have it.
 
Kaltias said:
Magi RobloxG said:
Well, someone unlock Zeno, Popeye, Chronos so I may add the ratings since the majority agreed on it & no one is adding the ratings for their profiles right now.
Click to expand...
This thread isn't about giving the "possibly far higher" to all the characters listed, it's about taking it away from Saitama
Click to expand...
Ain't Saitama is technically supposed to have that since he's still underdeveloped?
 
@magi Are you serious right now? You literally did the exact opposite of what this content revision thread was suggesting. They were agreeing to get rid of the "possibly far higher" for saitama, not add it to a bunch of other characters. Did you even read what the OP said?
 
Jonathanlighter said:
@magi Are you serious right now? You literally did the exact opposite of what this content revision thread was suggesting. They were agreeing to get rid of the "possibly far higher" for saitama, not add it to a bunch of other characters. Did you even read what the OP said?
Click to expand...
I missed the last part by accident.
 
Jonathanlighter said:
Change it back then. And the LITERAL title is SAITAMA REVISION. Why would you change other profiles if the revision is for SAITAMA.
Click to expand...
Ryu already fixed it and Loyal shouldn't have mentioned anyone else in this thread.
 
Since everybody seem to agree, I am also fine with removing the "Possibly far higher" part.
 
Probably not. Since it is a small change, I can fix this myself.
 
Since the changes have been applied, I think that it is probably safe for me to close this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

LIFE_OF_KING
Minor addition for Saitama
Replies
9
Views
927
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
darkphantom9805
  • Locked
Saitama upgrade
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
Planck69
Planck69
Shadow_x007x
  • Locked
Adjusted Tier Boros and Saitama
Replies
5
Views
2K
Shadow_x007x
Shadow_x007x
Bernkastelll
  • Locked
Saitama and Garou tier 3 changes
2 3
Replies
102
Views
9K
Bernkastelll
Bernkastelll
Shadow_x007x
  • Locked
Downgrade Saitama & Garou
Replies
12
Views
2K
AbaddonTheDisappointment
AbaddonTheDisappointment
Back
Top