-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Sailor Moon Tier 1 Upgrade
- Thread starter Iamunanimousinthat
- Start date
- Status
- 15,591
- 22,892
I disagree for reasons stated above.
(I feel you could make a feasible Tier 1 argument for this verse, but this ain’t it)
(I feel you could make a feasible Tier 1 argument for this verse, but this ain’t it)
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
No is required. Otherwise this is only Low1-C
- 15,441
- 7,154
I don't see even Low 1-C here lol.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,133
- 4,314
I don't even see
- 3,008
- 2,266
I don't evenI don't even see
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #87
You have got to be kidding. You’re comparing random words thrown on a page to a detailed explanation of how a realm has no concept of distance or direction. Be serious. The two aren’t comparable.
Again. Another false comparison. The statement I listed wasnt just a random statement but something that was stated to be happening in real time and supported by the Silver Crystal warping all of spacetime.
Once again. Not comparable, the galaxy cauldron literally creates possibilities which are what star seeds are that everything comes from. Its literal.
your comparisons dont work. Actually engage with the material instead of just making half hearted comparisons.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,350
- 4,197
I 
- 3,781
- 4,081
“Random words on a page”
If you don’t know what the words on the page mean or is saying then why are you claiming they aren’t comparable. I wasn’t even trying to compare the statement of sailor moon lacking distance or direction with the scan I presented either.
The actual argument I was presenting was other kinds of phrases and evidence that can be used to support the notion of a 1-A tier. Other such evidences like a structure embodying or transcending dimensionality itself. Which is what the scan I presented was demonstrating. All those words were concepts and ideas that the structure they’re in is embodying which includes “mathematics” and “higher dimensions” itself.
My point was that your evidence on its own was lacking and needed other things, such as the example I brought up, that would make your claim more substantial. That’s it.
Again you didn’t even address the argument that the statement doesn’t even fall into the 1-A category and is only low 1-C at best.
Again why are you trying to assume they’re not comparable if you don’t know the context around the scan? What makes you think the statement is not literal in the scan I presented because the context around that series makes it quite clear. Even the stars portion of the statement is very similar around both as well.
I am. I did. I actually engaged with the material and arguments you presented and said how it wasn’t enough and illustrated my point using Fire Force as an example. And for some reason, you just didn’t engage with the argument I presented and instead focused solely on how saying the scans I used are different from the scans you used. Which is completely missing my point.
I wasn’t gonna go into a full in depth dive into the full breakdown of Fire Force scaling because then that would be derailing. I’m just using it as an example here.
My point was that the evidence you presented is not substantiative enough to be 1-A and that if we go by just what you present you’re allowing a loose preponderance of evidence required to qualify for the actual highest tier on the wiki here.
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #91
And what is specifically lacking?
- 3,781
- 4,081
- 9,982
- 10,821
This thread can be closed? It has been universally rejected and doesn't really have valid reasoning as per our standards.
- 15,441
- 7,154
Or simply move it to Fun and Games.
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #96
Everything that Ultima said applies to the Corridor of Spacetime.
It is not just beyond spacetime, it has no concept of distance or direction, meaning that you can stack dimensions and they will still be inaccessible to this space. All dimensional space (at least 6D) are subsets of this space.
Any movement in any direction would be nonexistant.
- 5,232
- 2,321
I feel as though I do just need to point out, statements of being beyond space time=/=statements of being beyond dimensions, the former are a subset of the latter and cannot exist without it.
Now then on the topic of the CRT itself, a space that entirely lacks dimensions and directions is either 0D or 1-A at minimum, and given the characters aren't displayed as infinitesimally minute points, it would have to be the latter by process of elimination
Now then on the topic of the CRT itself, a space that entirely lacks dimensions and directions is either 0D or 1-A at minimum, and given the characters aren't displayed as infinitesimally minute points, it would have to be the latter by process of elimination
- 1,716
- 855
Lacking something (in this case distance/direction) =/= exceeding it, to let you know.
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #99
In this specific case, lacking > exceeding.
Transcendental distance is still distance and requires the concept of distance. Transcendental direction is still a direction and required the concept of direction
- 4,799
- 2,589
Does the verse even have a dimensional hierarchy where the higher transcends the lower one in the first place?
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #101
No, it doesn’t use quality superiority or Reality-Fiction trancendence. It uses the mathematically dimensional tiering, meaning characters have to destroy/create dimensional spaces to apply to tiers.
- 4,799
- 2,589
Just found the thread about 1-A Madoka with 100% the same reason You previously said that she is not 1-A because she can't destroy the realm with no direction but in fact she is the realm itself, even if it somehow doesn't translate to 1-A AP she still at least has large size type 11 but no she doesn't have it on profile, it's wanked.
You previously said that she is not 1-A because she can't destroy the realm with no direction but in fact she is the realm itself, even if it somehow doesn't translate to 1-A AP she still at least has large size type 11 but no she doesn't have it on profile, it's wanked.
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #103
that thread isn’t an CRT and id filled with trolls like this one is. If you want go argue in actual thread, go ahead, although like I said it would be hard to prove AP but at least you can prove durability.Just found the thread about 1-A Madoka with 100% the same reason
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #104
Also, thats not even evidence. Thats a description of what is on scene. That is nothing compared to this thread with in story definitions and explanations.Just found the thread about 1-A Madoka with 100% the same reason
it’s not even similar.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,133
- 4,314
almost forgot about that
- 15,441
- 7,154
I'll call a staff member to close this clownery of a CRT lol.
- 3,505
- 1,370
- Thread starter
- #108
I’m still having conversations with people. Stop derailing, trolling, and trying to close this prematurely.
- 3,008
- 2,266
Mate, if every single person in this thread disagrees with you (including admins), and you're arguments haven't changed, then you're probably in the wrong.
- 15,591
- 22,892
Yeah this is rejected.
- Status
Similar threads
