• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violations Reports - 67

Status
Not open for further replies.
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
I mean the post within of itself was a clear parody of the "who is getting the best head" meme which is just that... a meme

which shouldn't be taken that seriously, yeah i know you're doing your job but trying to give a ban to someone who literally posted it for laughs shouldn't allowed

A simple warning would be enough
Click to expand...
Buddy, time and place. If you posted that shit at work, you'd get fired. If you brought a picture of that to a golf club or some other hobby club, you'd be banned. It's no different here.
 
What's up with you trying to ban me?

I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
 
Yeah, I'm sorry, but you don't post such content in a public website "just for laughs". I'm afraid I must agree with a short ban as suggested above.
 
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
What's up with you trying to ban me?
I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
Click to expand...
1. Because you posted **** onto a site in which minors access it daily,

2. because it is a major rule, it is not just "some insignificant ruke" you are making it out to be
 
Because you posted ****. Very explicit ****. That simple really. The only reason you're getting off this light is because no actual malice was meant.

You'll be back in two weeks or a month anyways, depending on what's decided.
 
I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:
AngeronTheSkyHighAnger said:
What's up with you trying to ban me?
I've never broken any rules before, why would i by simply breaking one rule be banned at all?

a warning would be enough in anyway you look at it
Click to expand...
1. Because you posted **** onto a site in which minors access it daily,
2. because it is a major rule, it is not just "some insignificant ruke" you are making it out to be
Click to expand...
It wasn't even a physical image it was a link in a thread that probably was filled with references to NSFW content
 
I think 2 weeks is appropriate, considering he wasn't malicious, and he seems like a generally nice user otherwise.

Again, please be more careful in the future.
 
Do not post links to pornographic material. This will lead to an automatic ban without warning.
From what I read, AngeronTheSkyHighAnger is deserving of a ban. I checked the link and it is ****; one month looks appropriate as discussed above so I will make it.
 
Okay, I definitely cannot stress enough how against Fandom's TOS it is to upload **** on non-pornographic oriented wiki. Anyway, making jokes about sex aren't bad as long as they aren't extreme. But it is against the rules to make NSFW links or upload **** on the wiki. And for reference, if a thread is known for going too overboard and has been prone to attracting people going overboard, then it's often preferable to close the thread before it gets worse.

Anyway, I'm not entirely sure if the ban is needed if the intent wasn't malicious and has been constructive beforehand, but a strict warning is in order. And he must promise not to upload any more **** or make links to pornographic content. Though, I don't mind giving out a short block if that's what others agree with.
 
I think two weeks is more appropriate; it was agree by others and it didn't like AngeronTheSkyHighAnger took the warning seriously until now; I made the block.
 
I just saw the recent message from the reloading the page so if I am outvoted on my view; the change to the block can be made.
 
These two look like they could be socs, they post on the same threads and come in on the same day, each one giving support where the other appears.

Though I might just be wrong and wierd.
 
Same with Titris, and we just had three accounts who did the exact same thing yesterday. Seems extremely highly likely, but want to ask more input from other staff before blocking.
 
>three brand new accounts make similar posts on the same threads on the same day

They're 100% socks.
 
Thank you for helping out. I also think that a severe warning or 2 week block for Angeron is enough. We don't want him to miss out on our forum move after all.
 
I deleted the suicide image. We shouldn't feature gore either. Women in bikini is barely acceptable going by Fandom standards, but not anything erotic whatsoever.
 
Thank you to everybody who are helping out with the trolls btw.
 
Yes, I find zombies to be a disgusting morbid concept, but unless they are graphic, images of them don't automatically compare with gore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
32 33 34
Replies
1K
Views
99K
Elizhaa
Elizhaa
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
A minor addition about discussion rules
Replies
4
Views
776
Deleted member 40688
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
Mr. Bambu
  • Locked
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
2 3
Replies
80
Views
9K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top