Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps because it's not "Mikoto" to begin with? Seriously, the only reason this whole issue has started is out of sheer paranoia in Matt's part just saying that the user behind it is the "so-called" Mikoto without absolutely anything to prove it beyond having similar tastes, this sort of stuff has happened before and isn't solid criteria and we know it, as I could have the exact same taste as Ever, yet I'm not actually him, for example.DarkDragonMedeus said:I was going to wait, but yes; she is definitely Mikoto/Hans/Ted Ed after looking at that. Furthermore, Ted Ed also debated and said the exact same things on my wall on other wikis is another indicator. Mikoto is surprisingly not as malicious sounding as she used to be, but a sock is still a sock. So she should still be banned. I will do so.
Ironically, it is because you spend so much time being polite and respectful that this is the case.Antvasima said:Thank you for helping out.
When did I go from being that guy who usually tries his best to be polite and respectful to other members to a symbol of "Raah! Raah! Fight the power!" btw?
To be perfectly fair, me and Victoria ain't really beefing at all, so I wouldn't call this part drama. We're still chilling, and she got what she wanted out of this wiki anyways.GojiBoyForever said:All this Discord drama hurts my head, it's so ridiculous.
there are no threats, it's wording taken out of context and I've stated I would continue the gaia talk if it keeps getting mentioned which Darksspine kept doing. I been stopped in all actuality besides responding, I believe ShakeResounding should testify since he described what I was doing in the thread in itself. there's no death threats or anything of the sort.Wokistan said:Should prob be temporarily removed, given the wall thing and nebulous threats. That thread was going mostly fine before he started up by the looks of it so idk where that all came from
not too there.Wokistan said:"i said i'd be willing to derail it further getting it closed to prove my point if it continued,"
This is a problem
"i also said if i actually cared i'd see shadow, corgi and bacchus gone in a week "
This is an implied threat. They don't have to be death threats and that pretty clearly isn't one, but it's still not a thing you can do.
With that link you posted, you seem to have instigated the problem on someone elses message wall, so that doesn't really help you out.
I said that because I'm familiar with the rules, it's saying a wooden hammer won't put a dent in titanium.AogiriKira said:Also tempting fate by saying "Im only going to get a warning at best for this" does not make you look good in the slightest.
you guys could, but i'd say this is missing context and is telling one region of the story being told. I read the rules, saying that you know something won't happen because you the content that cites it isn't placing oneself above anything.The Wright Way said:I proppse a temporary ban. Breaker clearly thinks he's above the rules. I say we show him otherwise.