Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[CodeCCLL]

The joke was made based on this episode,

In your first comment here, you said that what you said was a joke about a line from the TV series "Akasya Durağı", and I wanted you to prove it.

However now, you sent a video of a completely different TV series that has nothing to do with the series you mentioned in the beginning, and there is not a single line in the video you sent related to the disturbing comment you made.

I will not comment further at this point.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

However now, you sent a video of a completely different TV series that has nothing to do with the series you mentioned in the beginning, and there is not a single line in the video you sent related to the disturbing comment you made.

I believe you may not know the meaning of "görcen," so I’ll provide my own explanation:

"Görcen" (excuse my language) means to expose one’s private parts. To prove this, you can check the meme explanations provided in the comments—here are the references. (here)

And once again, I want to emphasize that I’m making this comment to correct myself and to address my initial mistake. This is not a lie, and I’m not twisting what I’ve been defending. However, your comment was hurtful.

+
I’ve already stated that I presented the joke by “modifying” it. So, what is your judgment against me on this matter now?And you can check the comments or research it on YouTube; the topic is based on a sexual joke.

And I’d like to add that I said “ya Gilgamesh abi” here to turn the person’s fanboying into humor. I have no personal insult toward the individual; I simply made a joke about their fanboying.

 

[Antvasima]

@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @DarkGrath @Dereck03 @Planck69

We seem to need some help here.

 

[Antvasima]

@ShionAH @NothingToDebateWith @HalilAssassino @MarkGoldbridge

We also seem to need some help from people with expertice in the Turkish language here.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

We also seem to need some help from people with expertice in the Turkish language here.

Thank you for your understanding. If possible, would it be okay for someone knowledgeable about the topic (the joke) to provide their testimony here?

 

[ShionAH]

We also seem to need some help from people with expertice in the Turkish language here.

Can you quote me what I need to translate? or give information on

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

Can you quote me what I need to translate? or give information on

Here you go.

 

[ShionAH]

Alright so this is not from "Akasya Durağı" this is from "Seksenler" but I will say yes there is an actual similar gag in the TV show though obviously it doesn't contain the swear words or those names.

Anyways saying "Amını yiyim mi" or "Can I eat your *****" is kind of too weird to say to someone you don't know well but seeing the whole comment it is clearly just him warping the original gag (which turned into a meme in Turkey recently) into a weirder crude joke. Especially him singing the theme song right after shows it is very much not a serious request/comment.

All in all, its very clearly based on a meme and he is not lying, but he did warp the meme to be more crude. If he was friends with this person before I assume they were trying to ligthen up the mood between them and break the ice but didn't work.

 

[CodeCCLL]

give information on

Read the relevant comments starting from this comment and you will understand.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

All in all, its very clearly based on a meme and he is not lying, but he did warp the meme to be more crude. If he was friends with this person before I assume they were trying to ligthen up the mood between them and break the ice but didn't work.

We used to be friends, but as my friend mentioned above, my relationship with them deteriorated later on. That’s the current situation, entirely for now.
+
It’s humor based on their Gilgamesh fanboying. As a Turkish person, I believe you’d understand the joke in this context and I’d like to add that, apart from this incident, I have not shown any disrespect or inappropriate behavior. Thank you for your explanation

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you very much for helping out, Shion.

So what do our other staff members think about this? Is a warning sufficient, or should we apply a ban for a few weeks?

 

[Sir_Ovens]

A warning should be fine. I'm not gonna scrutinise him for a culture I'm not familar with. But he should be mindful that our users come from all over the world and most won't understand the nuance behind jokes rooted in a particular region's culture.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for your input.

Is somebody in our staff willing to give him an official warning and add it to our warning tracker then?

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

Is somebody in our staff willing to give him an official warning and add it to our warning tracker then?

Please excuse my ignorance, but if it’s not inappropriate to ask, is this warning simply a step toward banning me for my next mistake, or is it something that puts me at a disadvantage right now?

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

A warning should be fine. I'm not gonna scrutinise him for a culture I'm not familar with. But he should be mindful that our users come from all over the world and most won't understand the nuance behind jokes rooted in a particular region's culture.

I’m sorry, and I promise this mistake will not happen again.

 

[Antvasima]

It is a warning. If we see a pattern of bad behaviour without improving in our warning tracker, we will eventually ban you for a long time.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

It is a warning. If we see a pattern of bad behaviour without improving in our warning tracker, we will eventually ban you for a long time.

I understand, and you can be sure that something like this will not happen again! Wishing you good luck and a great day.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for being reasonable, and the best to you as well.

 

[Catzlaflame]

Is somebody in our staff willing to give him an official warning and add it to our warning tracker then?

@Shiedaisthepeak

Warning. Do not make sexually implicit jokes to people that don’t welcome it/people you’re not close to. Added to tracker.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

Warning. Do not make sexually implicit jokes to people that don’t welcome it/people you’re not close to. Added to tracker.

I’d like to clarify: I was close to this person (at the time I made the joke), and we were a duo, but currently, we don’t have a positive friendship. Saying it like this is a bit hurtful because it makes me look like a harasser, which is genuinely disgusting.

Additionally, I had only commented on the person’s fanboying.

 

[Vzearr]

I’d like to clarify: I was close to this person (at the time I made the joke), and we were a duo, but currently, we don’t have a positive friendship. Saying it like this is a bit hurtful because it makes me look like a harasser, which is genuinely disgusting.

Additionally, I had only commented on the person’s fanboying.

This doesn't need to be continued.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

This doesn't need to be continued.

I just wanted to point it out please excuse me.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

@Mr. Bambu

It seems like your help has been requested here.

I've commented on CRTs, sure, but that doesn't really give me particular context here, in this situation. My time has been limited here, and so I typically wouldn't reply- still, I was asked for, so I'll speak.

I think Lephyr hit the nail on the head on a lot of points. I recognize people have given this a warning pass but I genuinely think a short ban is the more appropriate action, as it's a fairly grotesque statement to make, whether meant in jest or otherwise. I wouldn't lop on more points regarding it being in another language (acknowledging that this is against the rules) due to it being from some show, but it's still fairly bad. Making sexually charged and unwarranted and public statements towards another user, whether as a reference or joke or not, is unacceptable in my opinion.

I would be more satisfied with the report with at least a two week ban being applied, possibly higher.

That all said, it is not my intent to pursue this heavily, as the report has concluded: my opinion, or "help", was requested: make of it what you will.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

I would be more satisfied with the report with at least a two week ban being applied, possibly higher.

I'd be fine with that

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

I would be more satisfied with the report with at least a two week ban being applied, possibly higher.

I have no objection to your comments on the situation this is exactly what I was hoping for. I’ve already stated that I will not repeat my mistakes in any way and that it was a one-time occurrence. Still, I leave it to your discretion.

 

[Antvasima]

I am also fine with Bambu's suggested solution here.

 

[GarrixianXD]

@Shiedaisthepeak Would you like to make a report on Floxiaaa? The fact that you excused them for intentionally character-assassinating you with the motive to get you banned, is worthy of concern.

Edit: nvm, seems like you already have done it.

Anyways, if what Shieda said is true about being close with Floxiaaa when he made that comment, I personally would just prefer a harsh warning instead because of its obscene nature. Though, I do not have any contentions against the 2-week ban proposal.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

Anyways, if what Shieda said is true about being close with Floxiaaa when he made that comment, I personally would just prefer a harsh warning instead because of its obscene nature. Though, I do not have any contentions against the 2-week ban proposal.

If you’d like, I can bring all my friends who witnessed this here (my own friend group). At one point, I even had a couple profile picture with them.

 

[GarrixianXD]

If you’d like, I can bring all my friends who witnessed this here (my own friend group). At one point, I even had a couple profile picture with them.

I'd be personally fine with that. However, I doubt that it'll get your warning rescinded even if you do get vouched.

 

[Shiedaisthepeak]

I'd be personally fine with that. However, I doubt that it'll get your warning rescinded even if you do get vouched.

Alright, I’ll tag them here. I hope I only receive a strict warning because I’ve already initiated a very important cosmology revision.

@Protector_Hunk @Gorkyss @TyraexgSama @InfNoyan

 

[GarrixianXD]

@Protector_Hunk @Gorkyss @TyraexgSama @InfNoyan

@Protector_Hunk @Gorkyss @TyraexgSama @InfNoyan

 

[InfNoyan]

@Protector_Hunk @Gorkyss @TyraexgSama @InfNoyan

They used to be close friends at the time this joke was made, and Floxia wasn’t offended by it back then. That’s my perspective on the matter.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I agree with Bambu's suggestion

 

[Antvasima]

Is somebody willing to apply a two weeks block to Shieda's forum and Fandom account with a suitable justification text then?

 

[Recon1511]

https://vsbattles.com/threads/strongest-one-punch-man-discussion-thread.107591/post-6862237

Reporting this guy for whatever this was lol

 

[ByAsura]

He has a sordid history of this kind of stuff (albeit usually when provoked to some degree), so maybe a month or few month ban would work, especially given more recent behaviour.

 

[PrinceofPein]

I honestly wanted to let this go since I do not take offence with things like this, which is why I am just making this report now.
I wish to report @Tyranno223
He has a way of positing his opinion as some sort of facts and dislikes it when people disagrees with him.
Here in his single reply to me, he adds statements that undermine the other person's intelligence

I am consistently getting annoyed by your poor reading comprehension Pein

To which I called him out on his attitude

I will reply later, but the thing here is that I did read the blog, if I state something contrary to it, it means I did not agree with what was written in the blog or rather your explanation of a text, as your opinions on this matter is not the law. Hence, I will give my own opinion too, this is also very condescending, it is like me replying to you and saying for every point you raised against my argument, it is because you never read the arguments.

Which he gave a half assed apology, admitted he is being condenscending and doubled down on his said attitude to other people's argument

Pein, I am being condescending (and I am admittedly being harsh, so I apologise about that) because you are stating things that are laid out in the blog. If the rebuttle focused on disputing what is laid out, I would be fine and even pleased as you saw.

But you are not. You are making statements about things I have already discussed! How can I not be annoyed? To put it plainly, you are missing the points I made in pre-emptive defense and going straight to the things I have already made statements against.

Certainly it is not a serious rule violation but insulting and doubling down is certain an offence regardless

 

[Tyranno223]

I honestly wanted to let this go since I do not take offence with things like this, which is why I am just making this report now.
I wish to report @Tyranno223
He has a way of positing his opinion as some sort of facts and dislikes it when people disagrees with him.
Here in his single reply to me, he adds statements that undermine the other person's intelligence

To which I called him out on his attitude

Which he gave a half assed apology, admitted he is being condenscending and doubled down on his said attitude to other people's argument

Certainly it is not a serious rule violation but insulting and doubling down is certain an offence regardless

Context is important.

You, on three seperate occasions, demonstrated a refusal to read the materials of the thread and the included blog.

I asked twice before displaying any genuine frustration. The chief tone I am displaying is frustration, albeit I admit that my initial response to your third post was overly condescending, and I still am sorry about that.

Your most recent post contained material that was already addressed in thread and in blog for a third time without any addressing of the already present rebuttal.

Edit:

Tolkien Tier High 1-A+ and 0 Proposal

Many thanks to Ultima for helping me with this project! This is a cosmology expansion for Tolkien's Legendarium that proposes Eru as tier 0 and the Ainur in their "Prior to entering Eä" key as High 1-A+...

vsbattles.com

My initial post directing him to read the blog after a outright erroneous post.

Tolkien Tier High 1-A+ and 0 Proposal

Many thanks to Ultima for helping me with this project! This is a cosmology expansion for Tolkien's Legendarium that proposes Eru as tier 0 and the Ainur in their "Prior to entering Eä" key as High 1-A+...

vsbattles.com

My response to him when he admitted to only reading the summary when I bolded an insistence that people read the blog. I also later highlight that even the summary made it clear his initial post was erroneous, demonstrating he didn't even properly read that

Tolkien Tier High 1-A+ and 0 Proposal

While Tolkien's faith influenced his writing, the tier justification stands on its own based on the source material's explicit descriptions. high 1-A+ placement for the Ainur is also well-supported by their described abilities and relationship to sub-creation, while still maintaining a clear...

vsbattles.com

A post during the point when my frustration boiled over too much. I compared two extracts, one from his last rebuttal to the thread and one from my blog.

His rebuttal was already addressed in the blog, showing that despite claiming to read it, he either did a poor job or did not read it properly.

 

[PrinceofPein]

His rebuttal was already addressed in the blog, showing that despite claiming to read it, he either did a poor job or did not read it properly.

He has a way of positing his opinion as some sort of facts and dislikes it when people disagrees with him.

You are literally doing the same thing, anything in your blog is an opinion and I do not agree with it and I am allowed to provide my own opinion.
I can also start making the same statements you are making.
"You lack reading comprehension cause you have not read my arguments and I have already addressed your rebuttal in your blog in my argument"
"You have not read my arguments and you cannot understand them"
"I will like you to read my argument"

As you can see you claiming all these cause I do not agree with you is dogmatic. Also based on your reply to my argument, I can either agree that you do not agree with my opinion or I can keep saying you did not read my argument, cause it sure feels like you did not, sending wall of texts that did not really address my arguments.

If everyone argues with snide remarks like you do, then this place will turn into a toxic hole.
Again for future reference, if someone does not agree with you = They did not agree with you
And not they lack reading comprehension, cause I can also make the same claim seeing as you just like sending wall of texts without providing any real argument.

Edit: No need to clog this thread up, just wait for the mods