- 167,678
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #22,761
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
shouldn't he be banned since he is a blatant troll? I mean if he upgraded him to Low 1-C i could see an argument but he punched in 1-A and poorly edited it as well
Link appears dead to me.
You can just copy paste the text itself. It will bring you to the post that Dread is reporting.Link appears dead to me.
"Because they got debunked". Okay so we're just lying now, cool. Elizhaa disagreed because he said there was evidence of QS. I asked him for that evidence. I have yet to receive a response, so until that happens, I don't feel comfortable counting the vote.Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for invalidating an administrator's vote in a staff thread
Fuji NEVER Cry [DMC Tier 1 Downgrades Yet Again]
Xenoblade clears tbh Are we currently waiting on any specific person's arguments atm? Or are we just looking for more staff input? Further staff input, although I specifically contacted Agnaa and DT and am waiting for their (likely very late) responses here.vsbattles.com
We don't decide whether their vote is valid or not only because they got debunked. Their stance should still be noted in the vote tally regardless.
I am not reading the rest of post since it seems to be waste of time of back and forth but you acknowledged that he disagreed with your thread.Elizhaa disagreed because
If you didn't read my post, then be quiet.I am not reading the rest of post since it seems to be waste of time but you acknowledged that he disagreed with your thread.
Simply add it to vote tally or my report will still be open since this is vote manipulation (invalidating staff member's vote). You added Qawasd's vote despite he acknowledged that he wants to wait for opposition. Same standard applies on disagreement part.
Sounds for me a double standard. If it is agreement, you note them down, and if it is disagreement, you don't unless it satisfies you.
Sorry, I am not here to entertain you.
The first link isn't working, btw.Sorry, I am not here to entertain you. He made his stance very clear of being in favour of low 1-C twice.
No, it very much should stay open. A bit of hostility shouldn’t change that (and it’s the staff members who should decide whether or not the thread is fine)Would it be better to simply close the thread? For one, I really just don't agree with the downgrade after all the taking points that've been brought forth by staff and knowledgeable members, and it seems to have gotten pretty hostile looking over the history of the replies.
I am simply waiting for clarification on a specific point. That's all. Your constant false accusations are getting annoying.I never suggested thread closure (although one needs to admit that the thread invited a lot of hostility and drama). I am reporting her for a clear vote manipulation.
Come to think of it, I haven't really seen anyone in the "disagree" section of the OP.
It's... literally Ant commenting on the DMC thread? And saying that my reasoning for the downgrade made sense?? what else do you want manThat has nothing to do with DMC or anything I said, and btw, both of the calculations in that thread are on the same level regardless. You can't simply count people who aren't knowledgeable in a verse or haven't ruled in favor of your changes as agreements.
I only woke up about 90 minutes ago.@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr._Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler
Are any of you willing to help out here please?
Regarding this: Elizhaa has the role they do because they are trusted within this community to lend judgement on threads. It is not the right of any given individual to discount that because they do not feel comfortable with the level of statement Elizhaa gave in giving this judgement. That is not to say that every staff member is right inherently, but it is not up to you, Fuji, to decide that Elizhaa's vote is to be discounted.Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for invalidating an administrator's vote in a staff thread
Fuji NEVER Cry [DMC Tier 1 Downgrades Yet Again]
Xenoblade clears tbh Are we currently waiting on any specific person's arguments atm? Or are we just looking for more staff input? Further staff input, although I specifically contacted Agnaa and DT and am waiting for their (likely very late) responses here.vsbattles.com
We don't decide whether their vote is valid or not only because they got debunked. Their stance should still be noted in the vote tally regardless.
I have permanently blocked the vandal.They have deleted Warning Messages off their walls and Dereck restored them only a moment ago.
A clear troll to me.
Left a message on his wall, undoing the edits now.Reporting this user for vandalizing Rimuru's (Nanatsu no Taizai) page
He keeps doing it. Now he vandalized this profile:Reporting this user for vandalizing Rimuru's (Nanatsu no Taizai) page
It is bias/selective counting of votes. It should also be noted that the OP/Anyone can't make a claim that they debunked a point without the thread itself being finished, since the point of a CRT is to approve or disappeov of an argument.Are any of you willing to help out here please?
Well they were warned, so perma-ban it is.He keeps doing it. Now he vandalized this profile:
Milim Nava (Web Novel)
Milim Nava is one of the first, and strongest Demon Lords. She is also a Dragonoid. Tier: 3-A Name: Milim Nava Origin: Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken Gender: Female Age: 2000+ Classification: Dragonoid Powers and Abilities: Attack Potency: Universe level (Comparable to Guy Crimson in base. She...vsbattles.fandom.com
Thanks, can you also reverse the changes made?Well they were warned, so perma-ban it is.