Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[BigSmoke4269]

Even if I was biased, letting giant mistakes pass would just be more likely to get you banned

 

[Ari64-SP]

Before you say something like "Wait, Bigsmoke and Ican't are both problematic people and are Pure Evil so they could team up", I was willing to let him get blocked for a month and on Omniversal Battlefields when I said going to make a COVID-19 particles (Fictional ones not real) and he did say I shouldn't which should help prove he's not going to be bias towards me and let giant mistakes pass

No one thinks you’re teaming up. This is reminding me of the dave Matthew situation.

 

[Ari64-SP]

As I said, the problem with my profiles is that the characters themselves are stupid. I don't think any of the profiles I was trying to create with serious intentions have been deleted.

Agreed exept for cool cat, which also had some... odd statistics

 

[Cropfist]

I think estimations are being treated too strictly.

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Cool Cat was a weird one, yeah. I should have just waited for the movies to come out, rather than relying on books that aren't available to me anymore.

 

[Ari64-SP]

Even then, I’d like to say that Ican’tthinkof1goodname (there, got it right for you) has made, at least to my knowledg, many different profiles, so not all of them can be winners.

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Could we just test my idea for one of his profiles? Obviously I'm not the best gatekeeper you guys could ask for, but it's better than nothing.

 

[Agnaa]

How does 5 profiles being deleted = A profile making ban? I'm sensing bias

Most people don't have 5 profiles deleted without shaping up. But we don't really have an exact number for any of this stuff, I don't remember how many bad profiles people with other profile bans had to make.

Maybe the profile ban could be temporary, or the profile ban could just be on directly posting profiles and you'd need another reliable member to look over them before they're posted.

 

[Thelastmlg]

I think a permanent ban is too much, give him a temporary one so he can at least have the chance to get better at creating profiles if he wants.

 

[SamanPatou]

I agree, permanent is really too much.

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

1 month should suffice (we’re talking about a profile making ban, not a wiki ban, right?)

 

[Thelastmlg]

Yep, profile making ban, he isn't a troll or anything.

 

[EmbalmerMaster9000]

Ican't has good intentions, it's just the quality of the profiles that is the problem. I've shined some light on his Stalker profile on a thread; I can try fixing up the profiles he makes. Ideally, he should try posting them in a blog and asking for criticism, which is what he's done more recently.

 

[Thelastmlg]

Yeah that's a good

 

[Antvasima]

So should we forbid him from making profile pages without first having them accepted by staff members, and if so, for how long?

 

[Thelastmlg]

Like maverick said, 1 month should be enough, he already started shaping up.

 

[Ican'tthinkof1goodname]

Two months is fine

 

[Ionliosite]

Or he should ask a staff to see if his profiles are good and he can release them

That's exactly what Ant said.

 

[Crabwhale]

No offense but this is for the staff to decide.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

@Ican'tthinkof1goodname Post it to a sandbox first, ask a more experienced page creator to look at it. That seems simple enough to me, I think a ban is wildly overzealous atm.

 

[Antvasima]

So should we forbid him from making profile pages without first having them accepted by staff members, and if so, for how long?

@All staff members.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I suppose that's a reasonable compromise.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I think that works, though I still think it might be a wee bit egregious. I'm more than happy to look over prospective profiles. Duration doesn't matter to me- optimally I would leave it indefinite and simply lift the restriction when the man has made obvious improvements to page quality.

 

[Antvasima]

Mr._Bambu's suggestion seems fine to me.

 

[Crabwhale]

I agree with Bambu.

 

[Sir_Ovens]

I agree with Bambu as well.

 

[AKM sama]

I'm fine with Bambu's suggestion and it looks like that's what we're going with.

 

[Damage3245]

Agreed. Mr. Bambua's suggestion seems fine.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. We seem to have reached a conclusion then.

 

[Lollipop_The_King]

We've got another rat

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Blocked

 

[Thelastmlg]

Lmao they didn't even attack the profile stats this time, just the win and loss, is that new?

 

[Agnaa]

Please just report and move on. Discussion on the history of vandals doesn't belong in this thread.

 

[Star_King_Demon_Lord]

Reporting Sakoura otchiha and Sasuki misugi. Most likely sockpuppet accounts of Gon Hxh. His first reply was on a poll posted by Gon Hxh about around a month ago. They both put polls in the General category ignoring the Guidelines for the Versus Thread Rules and spells characters' names wrong. I recommend probably checking his IP Address to see how many more sockpuppet accounts he has.

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

As someone who has reported Gon HxH's socks for quite some time in the realm of Discussions, I can confirm that it does seem to be him. Even the (intentional) bad grammar and other nonsensical pictures he posts on polls are the same

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I blocked the socks.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you to all of you for helping out.

 

[SamanPatou]

Vandal, they changed Bidoof's tier to 0

 

[XSOULOFCINDERX]

Bruh....

 

[KieranH10]

And the Scarlet King too