• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

He'll clearly not change so I don't even know why we bothering to give him a chance again
 
I'm definitely not settling for anything below six months, given a lack of regret and willingness to truly admit what he did wrong. Hard no from me.
 
And if he's annoying after his ban is over, we ban him again. If he's annoying after that we ban him again. If this pattern repeats ad infinitum, would it not be easier to ban him, ad infinitum?
 
Annoying isn’t enough to ban someone for a significant amount of time. He isn’t harassing you, he isn’t making faulty profiles, he is bringing points on up a topic you don’t like.
That isn’t worth more than 1-3 months at most. He even agreed to drop it.
 
Bans present an opportunity to change. If he doesn't improve then, that's his problem. How much trouble is he really gonna cause, anyways? No one seems to like what he does very much so he'll be watched like a hawk the moment he comes back, and if he ***** up again then he'll be banned again, and I'll be more receptive to a permaban at that point.

But for now - the guy hasn't been banned once. I don't care how annoying he is. A permaban is ABSOLUTELY not justified.
 
I don't get why people are so trigger happy with permabans. As I keep saying, permabans are only for reserved for really malicious users, vandalizers, trolls and those who have been repeatedly banned but don't change their behavior to productively aid the site.

This user hasn't been banned even once yet and people are already gunning for permaban saying "he won't change". That's a stupid assumption and that is not how things are done. If he has been given multiple warnings and is still being annoyingly persistent about Cool Cat, we won't permanently ban him just for that. That is way too much. Even 6 months is way too much for that.

Ban him for a month or two at max to make him understand what he did wrong. If he does it again after coming back, we will ban him for longer.
 
He was given time to change. He squandered it. That's on him.

My stance has not changed. Preferred permaban, willing to compromise to a year, giving how he still does not show regret or remorse.
 
00potato said:
Annoying isn’t enough to ban someone for a significant amount of time. He isn’t harassing you, he isn’t making faulty profiles, he is bringing points on up a topic you don’t like.
Click to expand...
BigSmoke actually does have a history of making poor quality profiles though
 
Sympathy to those who have not changed and do not wish to accept how they were wrong, equally, gets really annoying.

1 year compromise.
 
Literally everything he has done thus far showed he's not willing to change
I really doubt a few months banned will suddenly make him go "oh look, I shouldn't spam a topic I have been told multiple times about that the answer about is no"

Like I just want to cut the middle part where we'll need to deal with him again
 
I personally think 3 months is reasonable
 
I would be willing to compromise not banning BigSmoke as long as the concept of Cool Cat is banned off our site.

Let's cut the black and white bullshit and just not give him any legal loopholes.
 
Tllmbrg said:
Literally everything he has done thus far showed he's not willing to change
I really doubt a few months banned will suddenly make him go "oh look, I shouldn't spam a topic I have been told multiple times about that the answer about is no"

Like I just want to cut the middle part where we'll need to deal with him again
Click to expand...
That is not what can be decided now. We give them a chance to change. What happens afterwards, we will see when it comes to that.
 
Sir_Ovens said:
I would be willing to compromise not banning BigSmoke as long as the concept of Cool Cat is banned off our site.

Let's cut the black and white bullshit and just not give him any legal loopholes.
Click to expand...
This actually sounds rather reasonable. If we ban Cool Cat as a concept completely without intent to bring him back, I'm willing to lessen my hand on the position quite a sizable amount.
 
AKM sama said:
That is not what can be decided now. We give them a chance to change. What happens afterwards, we will see when it comes to that.
Click to expand...
We already did give him a chance to change. Spoiler alert, it didn't work.
 
3-6 months is fine with me, anything further would be pushing it.

I will also agree to banning Cool Cat granted the lack of want for it here.
 
Moritzva said:
Sympathy to those who have not changed and do not wish to accept how they were wrong, equally, gets really annoying.
Click to expand...
A ban isn't sympathy. It is a punishment. And it is being given exactly to make him understand that.
 
If Cool Cat is banned a la Suggs in terms of "We don't want it here, we won't have it here", then I'll settle for 3 months without complaint.
 
AKM sama said:
A ban isn't sympathy. It is a punishment. And it is being given exactly to make him understand that.
Click to expand...
A lenient punishment is sympathy. Root out the source rather than allow yet another repeat.
 
Maybe this is bit too odd but for peoples that want BigSmoke get a permaban or one year ban, do you guys still have a humanity inside?
 
Suggverse was banned due to a majority distaste for it on the site. There is a majority distaste for Cool Cat as well. As such, by majority decree, we are allowed to not want it existing anywhere on our site.

If BigSmoke still brings it up again, I will have absolutely no qualms with a permaban then.
 
AKM sama said:
That is not what can be decided now. We give them a chance to change. What happens afterwards, we will see when it comes to that.
Click to expand...
Okay since it was talked about how about we ban Cool Cat?
If he continues his behaviour with other pages then we permanently ban him
 
Veloxt1r0kore said:
Maybe this is bit too odd but for peoples that want BigSmoke get a permaban or one year ban, do you guys still have humanity inside?
Click to expand...
... No, not particularly.

Anywhoo, does anyone disagree with the compromise?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
93K
Comiphorous
Comiphorous
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
1K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
415
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top