-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
rimuru transcending platonic concepts
- Thread starter luth
- Start date
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 7,695
- 4,278
No.
- 6,994
- 4,276
No.
- 15,569
- 10,338
yes
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #5
reason?
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #6
reason?
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #7
can you explain?
- 15,569
- 10,338
no
- 6,994
- 4,276
The reason is that their is no logic the Wiki accepts that would grant a Tier solely from "Transcending Platonic Concepts"... which Rimuru doesn't actual have any feats or statements of.
Bernkastell, meanwhile, is just messing with you, and I'd strongly prefer it if they didn't do that and risk causing confusion with a new user.
Bernkastell, meanwhile, is just messing with you, and I'd strongly prefer it if they didn't do that and risk causing confusion with a new user.
- 18,701
- 5,885
1. Where is the evidence of this?
2. We stopped using platonic concepts as evidence of being 1-A a while ago.
2. We stopped using platonic concepts as evidence of being 1-A a while ago.
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #11
oh, ok
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #12
its just an argument i heard debaters use, just wanted to know if its true or not.
- 15,569
- 10,338
in the current VS Battles standard, no, Platonic Concepts aren't 1-A, however, in others battleboards sites or whatever, everything can be argued, let's see, according to the theory of forms, the physical world is not ''real'', it is just a representation of the realm of ideas, which are the concepts, and said concepts are impossible to be interacted, affected, destroyed etc, and they are unbound by things like space and time, well, that's why others debaters argue that platonic concepts are 1-A, however, fiction does not follows it at all, different verses uses different ways to define what is a concept, and most of times, it is not even enough to grant a tier, let alone 1-A, so, that's why VS Battle does not use Platonic Concepts as a 1-A thing, unless the verse does meet the enough criteria
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #14
i see, thanks
- 180
- 125
But that's what's funny about Bern. lol
- 15,569
- 10,338
I am annoying, that's it
- 15,569
- 10,338
you're welcome, my bad about my behavior in these previous comments lmfao
- 59
- 9
- Thread starter
- #18
lol, its alright
- 6,994
- 4,276
No it's not funny, it's just annoying and one of these days it might end up being brought to RVR for disrupting the Wiki.
- 6,605
- 4,143
Actually Plato's weren't 1-A.
It's like how people wank Carl Jung stuff and claim they are 1-A under his theory.
At best you could get Low 1-C.
Darksmash
He/Him- 1,494
- 1,636
Plato(hardcore finitist) rolling in his grave seeing his concepts being wanked above absolute infinity
Vietthai96
He/Him- 9,240
- 12,290
just Plato being 1-A is like arguing 1-A only need reality-fiction
- 1,277
- 867
this reminds me of arguments like "Jiren transcending platonical concept of time = Goku is Outer" I hear in other servers. (Discord servers) It's just....
- 180
- 125
It's just....
- 1,277
- 867
- 1,277
- 867
huh, was thinking of posting it here, but nvm, ill just create a new thread instead in Questions and answer.
Similar threads
- Locked
