- 13,919
- 5,889
it never being referred to directly in the anime
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it never being referred to directly in the anime
Tho this is super stupid.And then we are using this single comic scan to buff the cosmology to 5-D despite it never being referred to directly in the anime or anything else again. I don't support it whatsoever.
And then we are using this single comic scan to buff the cosmology to 5-D despite it never being referred to directly in the anime or anything else again. I don't support it whatsoever.
Is R&M anime???
Anime and Cartoons are the same thing, don't get fooled from etlists.Is R&M anime???
Temporal dimension???Don't mind me, just following
(Also don't try get the statement to 6D and above, the universe has 3 spacial dimensions, 2 extra spacial dimensions is still plural and only 5D, no evidence to assume there's more than 5, at most you can get a possibly higher)
The scan never mentions temporal dimensions.Temporal dimension???
Also it spatial
6 is from what?6 spatial dimensions
This is just a baseless assumption. If you wanna argue higher than 2, what stops me from also randomly adding 4, 100, 1 million, or even infinite?I asked some people and basically when someone puts the "s" and makes something plural you can take the least (2) and add a possibly rating (3)
I personally am fine with making it only have 5 spatial dimensions but if its possible to give a "possibly" rating by using the "s" then it should be fine. Do we have any rule or any thread about this?This is just a baseless assumption. If you wanna argue higher than 2, what stops me from also randomly adding 4, 100, 1 million, or even infinite?
It's common sense. When we talk about "tens" we only take 20. When we talk about hundreds, we only take 200. When we talk about dozens, we only take 24.I personally am fine with making it only have 5 spatial dimensions but if its possible to give a "possibly" rating by using the "s" then it should be fine. Do we have any rule or any thread about this?
ok but it's baseless, what stops me from also making "possibly +300000" on this same logic.Tbh "s" is at least 2x, possibly more, so ig this is where at least +2, possibly +3 dimensions comes from.
Because 3 is the very least in the scope of “possible”, and it is definitely possible that “s” means more than just +2.ok but it's baseless, what stops me from also making "possibly +300000" on this same logic.
Even +3 trillions are in the scope of possible, so?Because 3 is the very least in the scope of “possible”, and it is definitely possible that “s” means more than just +2.
Yeah but we take the lowest ball possible for the sake of scaling.Even +3 trillions are in the scope of possible, so?
Aka only +2, thanks for conceding.Yeah but we take the lowest ball possible for the sake of scaling.