Revision Recruitment: Stellar Revisions Try 2

[Antvasima]

You can ask some other calc group members if that is correct.

 

[Jobbo]

The wiki has already accepted that value as the correct one, it's our baseline for planet level.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Then the Gravitational Binding Energy page should preferably be updated accordingly.

 

[Antvasima]

Are there any other values in the GBE page that are different from the ones that we otherwise use in this wiki?

Perhaps it would be better to remove the "List of approximate GBE values for various objects" section altogether?

 

[Jobbo]

The other values match up.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thanks.

 

[Antvasima]

I have updated the GBE page value.

 

[Flashlight237]

Again, where's the source for this?



You just CAN'T go around claiming a formula is accurate without knowing the source.

 

[DontTalkDT]

Again, where's the source for this?


You just CAN'T go around claiming a formula is accurate without knowing the source.

We had sourced that in prior threads. See here or here page 101.

 

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

@DontTalkDT Is the "more accurate value" for Earth more accurate, and if yes what is the source of it?

 

[DontTalkDT]

Source is probably just this wikipedia article. If it's calculated as described there it should indeed be more accurate.

 

[Antvasima]

Hello.

It seems like only the energy chart was updated in the Attack Potency page based on the revised attack potency chart blog, and not the standard sizes sectio.

I would greatly appreciate if somebody would be willing to update it according to the new standards defined by Assaltwaffle's blog post, including inserting a link to it.

 

[Antvasima]

I would still greatly appreciate some help in this regard. I can temporarily unlock the page if necessary.

 

[Antvasima]

It seems like the Dragon Ball pages were never updated according to the new attack potency chart:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2075061

Would anybody be willing to restart this revision project in another staff thread? We obviously do not have to do it all at once, and can take it nice and slow if that is better.

 

[Dark649]

I have revised the Dragon pages, but they could be higher than that if the multipliers are accepted, but that is still under discussion in another thread.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you for the help.

 

[Jobbo]

Yes. And Frieza shouldn't have the + sign anymore, his attack is now below the arithmetic mean.

 

[Dark649]

Where the + starts for High 5-A currently?, i'm willing to fix things if the it does not reach the plus.

 

[Antvasima]

I think 1.573 x 10^40 J.

 

[Dark649]

Frieza casual feat is 1.7 tenatons.

 

[Antvasima]

What is that in Joules?

 

[Dark649]

7.3069286e+39.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, then it should not have a + sign.

 

[Dark649]

When it reaches the at least on High 5-A?.

 

[Antvasima]

We tend to use "at least" for characters that may be higher, but we do not know for certain.

7.3069286 x 10^39 J is far below the upper border of High 5-A though.

 

[Dark649]

I removed the +.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.