Regarding the existence of Composite human: Part 2

[Yobo_Blue]

Previous Thread

Discuss the viability of CH's existence here

Agreed: Jackythejack, Junkoposter, Paul Frank, Monarch Laciel, CinnabarManx421, Buttersamuri, Hellbeast, The Pen and the Sword, Andytrenom, HeadlessKramerGeoff, Saikou the Lewd King, Antvasima, Apex PredatorX, Nemo212, Paulo.junior.969, Elizhaa, Dragonmasterxyz, DarkDragonMedeus, GoCommitDi, KLOL506

Disagreed: Wokistan, The Wright Way(?), Iamunanimousinthat(?), Lsirlancelotdulaci, Uninown, Moritzva, Redacted Flinn, DMB 1, I'm Blue daba dee daba die, TriforcePower1, N Kardashev, GojiBoyForever, Yellowpig10, MrDrProfessorPatricio

Neutral: I'm blue daba dee daba die, ThePerpetual, Sir Ovens, Colonel Krukov, Stalker Maggot

 

[Moritzva]

It's a grim day.

Ah well, guess Composite Battles Wiki is needed after all.

 

[MrDrProfessorPatricio]

You forgot to add me in Disagreement from last thread

Not that it matter though

 

[Yobo_Blue]

Fixed that. Sorry.

 

[Overlord775]

Am i nonexistant to you Yobo ?

<-<

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

The vote count might be missing a few, because there were too many comments on the last thread, and I just went through it really fast, so I might have missed some.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

Am i nonexistant to you Yobo ?

<-<

yes

 

[Buttersamuri]

Following

and a Composite wiki sounds like it would be awesome

 

[Yobo_Blue]

"At some point. I have an SAT retake Saturday and several tests tomorrow. Might be able to Saturday but anything prior would just be rudimentary. You can send this there if you want"

Wok on when he will be able to respond

 

[Moritzva]

>composite wiki

>wiki's strongest, including VSBW and FCOC profiles

>still just EWTRTW

 

[Overlord775]

Am i nonexistant to you Yobo ?

<-<

yes </div>

Just add me to the "Agreed" list already you BAKA

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Would a Composite Wiki just be the same as this one except very single character has to be a composite of every version? That would be the best way to waste my time ever, plz do that.

 

[DMB_1]

The Composite Fictional Character

 

[Ionliosite]

I personally disagree with deleting him, but I agree he shouldn't be counted on the Real World because he isn't, well, real, just an hypothetical experiment.

 

[Amexim]

Just make it a blog on here and put this shit to bed. God. Why is that not the first option? Is there a rule to blogposts too?

 

[KGiffoni]

Disagree FRA.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

I will be messaging Wokistan about this and if he still wants to give input

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

16 to 20

 

[Psychomaster35]

I disagree with CH being removed as well. The CH, for one, can still fight, especially if his/her personality has been merged with serial killers and terrorists, so that means he/she would have natural bloodlust. He/she would also have the experience of many military people who were in wars.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

I disagree with CH being removed as well. The CH, for one, can still fight, especially if his/her personality has been merged with serial killers and terrorists, so that means he/she would have natural bloodlust. He/she would also have the experience of many military people who were in wars.

Isn't this a extreme non-sequitur?

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

CH being able to fight actually doesn't have that much to do with the reasons for deletion; the deletion is because Real Life Composites aren't allowed, whether they're functional or not, with most o the reasons for their deletion also applying to CH. And even if it did have to do with how useful he is in a fight, there's still the points brought up in the last thread about many of his characteristics contradicting each other.

 

[Bobsican]

I´ll just say that I always wanted CH deleted for the standard breaking, and I still do, so in other words, I agree with CH being nuked for all the reasons that have been mentioned until now.

 

[Wokistan]

about me forcing the thread to wait: I have the SAT to retake on Saturday, and several tests for tomorrow. Due to that I'm not doing anything that takes me more than like a few minutes to do at a time here until that stuff is done. Might be able to comment by Saturday, if I'm still out by Monday you can prob just stop waiting for me

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Ok then

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Also, Skalt 711 disagreed with axing CH, So the tally is now 18 to 22

 

[Iceber1234]

I don't see why it should be deleted. It should stay.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Young Mazi disagreed. And KLOL agreed with my points against deleting CH.

So put Mazi and put KLOL with a question mark

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Because Real Life Composites aren't allowed.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

22 agree and 21 disagree.

Yeah, even if he does get axed, this was a close one

 

[ShakeResounding]

It's not all about votes in a scenario like this, it's about who makes the better case.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Yeah, that is true. For example, Psychomaster35 voted for CH to stay, but the reasoning he gave was "CH can still fight", which really doesn't have that much to do with most of the reasonings for deletion.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

It's still a vote though.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

That doesn't really matter. If someone said "I think CH should stay because potato", we wouldn't count that just because "it's still a vote". The reasoning behind the vote has to make sense. Heck, there are even people saying "for reasons above" when there are no reasons above.

 

[Iceber1234]

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

That doesn't really matter. If someone said "I think CH should stay because potato", we wouldn't count that just because "it's still a vote". The reasoning behind the vote has to make sense. Heck, there are even people saying "for reasons above" when there are no reasons above.

Using gibberish as a reasoning isn't the same as a faulty argument.

Um, people on the last thread voted FRA due to mine,Gojobois, Yellow Pigs, Moritvasz, arguments. If we count it based off votes with proper reasoning, then many of the votes for axing him would have to be cut

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Gibberish and faulty argument are both worthless. You need a good argument for the vote to count.

I'm not talking about the last thread, I'm talking about this one. Go ahead and cut the votes for axing him that do not have proper reasoning, if the reasoning is faulty, they shouldn't be there either. The only votes that count are the ones with actually good reasoning, regardless of what side they're voting for.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

I'm too lazy to go through both threads and find ones with simple arguments

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Me too.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

I'll go through it tomorrow

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Either way, the main reasoning for deletion is that CH breaks the rules in the same way the other Real Life Composites did, and that many of the reasons for their deletion also apply to CH, with the only thing that prevented him from being deleted along with them being his popularity, with popularity being agreed by most to not be a valid reason.