- 9
- 1
Yes kntlThat's what i said up there
CASE BY CASE
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes kntlThat's what i said up there
CASE BY CASE
4D goku babywho views the other as fiction in DB?
You convinced me.i reworded the tiering system with a better one
Tier 0: Boundless beings:
Boundless characters.
tier -1: humans: see boundless beings as fiction
Tier - ∞: Son Goku: God fusion goku goes outside of the fiction and fused with IRL audience
I am pretty sure thats just High 1-B+. In here, seeing High 1-B as fiction is same as seeing High 1-B as lower dimension, like higher/lower dimensional difference = reality/fiction difference.do we really accept dimensional difference as transcendence or automatically assume that the difference between them are higher infinities? Since I'm pretty sure seeing something as 2-D is not automatically qualitative superiority. Like iirc seeing an High 1-B structure as fiction is enough for you to be 1-A, but seeing it as a lower dimension would simply make you just higher to High 1-B or low 1-A.
So pretty much, R>F is indeed qualitatively superior to dimensional difference.
Though not as much as the OP is proposing lol.
DB views other fictions as fictions.who views the other as fiction in DB?
I am pretty sure it didn't work that way in this wiki.You're right, realty-fiction difference is not the same as higher dimensional difference; it's lower.
It's pretty much a snazzy coat of paint added to characters being able to warp reality on a universal scale in a universe that isn't their own, but this isn't a superiority, they're still humans at the end of the day. Half of the time when this is properly explored, the "fiction" in question is just another universe in the multiverse.
Really, a reality-fiction difference should never be considered a superiority.
Steven universe views sailor moon as fictionDB views other fictions as fictions
They can write a tier 0 hierarchy in the fiction, then transcend it by existing, if it's truly reality-fiction.I think that would only be considered 1-A, rather than Tier 0
In my personal view I still only see that as some greater degree of 1-A unless the Verse they're viewing has a 1-A realm within it.They can write a tier 0 hierarchy in the fiction
They can simply write an 1-A realm into the work, making realms with higher tiers in a fiction doesn't take more power, just more pretentious descriptions.In my personal view I still only see that as some greater degree of 1-A unless the Verse they're viewing has a 1-A realm within it.
it doesn't work like that, i know this is a fun and games thread but no lolThey can simply write an 1-A realm into the work, making realms with higher tiers in a fiction doesn't take more power, just more pretentious descriptions.
The main setting can be the fiction, and still have someone above it, like a writer making the book.it doesn't work like that, i know this is a fun and games thread but no lol
hierarchy scales to the main setting, making a 1A realm would just be making a 11A realm, unless further context.
if he does, we make him 1A or higher, if he doesn't, we don't, simple.The main setting can be the fiction, and still have someone above it, like a writer making the book.
Say, if it's a mostly normal verse, with the writer appearing as some supreme being, just making him Low 1-C doesn't make much sense to me, since while the fiction that he transcends wouldn't explicitly have any higher dimensional stuff, he can very easily just write it all in and make it an 1-A structure.
But he could. If J.K Rowling wanted, she could write, "and then Harry saw infinite dimensions, a realm above the infinite dimensions, and infinity realms above the infinity, infinite, transcendental, platonic, Wan Ei Buzzword, whatever", and make Harry Potter 1-A, it'd take no more power than writing a realistic non-powered setting.if he does, we make him 1A or higher, if he doesn't, we don't, simple.
if the author transcends a 4D structure, he's 5DBut he could. If J.K Rowling wanted, she could write, "and then Harry saw infinite dimensions, a realm above the infinite dimensions, and infinity realms above the infinity, infinite, transcendental, platonic, Wan Ei Buzzword, whatever", and make Harry Potter 1-A, it'd take no more power than writing a realistic non-powered setting.
If there is nothing 1-A in the verse, then we can only place writer at Low 1-C. If writer is 1-A then 1-A hierarchy or some evidence is needed in order to give the writer 1-A tier not just rely on "supreme being can write anything and make a 1-A structure"The main setting can be the fiction, and still have someone above it, like a writer making the book.
Say, if it's a mostly normal verse, with the writer appearing as some supreme being, just making him Low 1-C doesn't make much sense to me, since while the fiction that he transcends wouldn't explicitly have any higher dimensional stuff, he can very easily just write it all in and make it an 1-A structure.
Because, if it's truly fiction to them, they just can make it higher, at will. It's not complicated, writing 4-D or 5-D makes no difference, I don't suddenly become infinitely stronger when I make my homebrew D&D cosmology one dimension higher.if the author transcends a 4D structure, he's 5D
he could, but he never did, why would we give theoretical ratings?
this... man you become stronger compared to them... please know what you're talking about...Because, if it's truly fiction to them, they just can make it higher, at will. It's not complicated, writing 4-D or 5-D makes no difference, I don't suddenly become infinitely stronger when I make my homebrew D&D cosmology one dimension higher.
I become stronger, by making them stronger, while nothing about me changes at all? There's no difference to myself in this case, I can change it back to 4-D, then to 1-D, 0-D, 1-A, High 1-A, Tier 0, all on a whim and with no effort at all. The layer of reality-fiction between me and them allows me to turn their realm into anything I want within the tiering system.this... man you become stronger compared to them... please know what you're talking about...
you're not becoming stronger you're just making yourself stronger in their perspectiveI become stronger, by making them stronger, while nothing about me changes at all? There's no difference to myself in this case, I can change it back to 4-D, then to 1-D, 0-D, 1-A, High 1-A, Tier 0, all on a whim and with no effort at all. The layer of reality-fiction between me and them allows me to turn their realm into anything I want within the tiering system.
You can't really compare characters in this manner, if I make a 4-D realm, and a dude besides me makes a 5-D one, he's not infinitely stronger than me. He can add infinite layers of reality-fiction in his work, and he's still not stronger than me, who has just one. It wouldn't make sense to tier us differently.
I really don't see how unless you mean "from the PoV of the people in the verse, they think you're X tier", in which case that's just them being wrong. For my actual power, nothing changes at all.you're not becoming stronger you're just making yourself stronger in their perspective
let me be clear, you make a verse Which is 4D, you're 5D in that verse, you make a verse that's 1A, you're 1A in that verse, we're 3D but we made tier 0 fictions, soI really don't see how unless you mean "from the PoV of the people in the verse, they think you're X tier", in which case that's just them being wrong. For my actual power, nothing changes at all.
Which is how we do now, but I already explained why I find it flawed.let me be clear, you make a verse Which is 4D, you're 5D in that verse, you make a verse that's 1A, you're 1A in that verse, we're 3D but we made tier 0 fictions, so
Which is how we do now, but I already explained why I find it flawed.
Let's agree to disagree since this definitely will go nowhere.