theres probably more but rn all i have is this
Is this all or is there more?
The bombs don't seem to be upgraded tho, I believe it refers to the new glider, mask and sword as I can see in the video. The bomb rack is still the same as before, relatively untouched before the infamous penthouse fight scene.
the interview implies everything harry has is upgraded, hence why he said "normans stuff but on a whole other level" etc, and new goblins bombs can literally damage a large part of giant sandman's head and has a bigger aoe blast in general then normans
IDK, they mostly emphasize on the Glider being upgraded from what I can see.
Damaging Sandman doesn't mean much, Peter knocked off his fingers by swinging around from Harry's arm.
yea they also didn't empathize with the green sword despite it being a new weapon entirely. I guess they just thought the glider was the coolest thing to talk about but the fact that he said "equipment" means pretty much everything he had if he meant only the glider I'm sure they would've specified
the bomb did way more damage than peter being thrown by harry
They emphasized on the mask as well.
It did the damage in Sandman's face. In Sandman's case his arms and fists would be his more stronger portion of his body, unless you wanna argue 8-B Pumpkin Bombs.
I see. Still, Norman shouldn't be overwhelmingly weaker given his brutalizing of Spider-Man, whereas New Goblin drew blood from a holding-back Peter with bladed weapons.
Hmmmmm, how about this...
this looks fine to me
This seems fine
Yes, but those are for specialized exploding modes I believe.
Apparently some parts of it are canon and add additional context, like how Spider-Man got his suit professionally made from someone in contact with the Flying Dutchman, and the bomb vaporizing part, but other parts visibly do not match up with the final films, like Brock's death (In the novel, Brock's skeleton is ripped out leaving only the Symbiote to be vaporized, but in the movie, Eddie and the Symbiote are both simultaneously vaporized as Brock tries a last ditch attempt to reunite with it). Not sure how many contradictions exist tho.
Can't say, I haven't read the novels, and so far I only found Brock's death being the only contradiction.
Yes, very.
fanservice
I feel your pain
Right now I be the only man here that can tag staff members, but usually as of late they be not responding. But I'll try my luck.
according to lonkkitt that part of the script is contradicted by goblins own words such as when he kept mocking peter about his morality and him just pulling his punches will get you killed
probably yea, most of the time the goblins strat is to use cheap tricks to land blows on peter such as surprise attacking him in the burning building or purposely making him weak holding a cart full of kids and mj while chronically bleeding holding that wire just so he can manhandle him in that small building, goblin probably didn't even expect peters rage amp to be that powerful
I think Lonkitt explained at the NWH thread on why we cannot use the script to justify Tom wasn't holding back against Gobby. It's somewhere there i forgor
Screenplay doesn't match up with the fact that Goblin called out Peter twice for holding back during their first fight, and later expressed excitement during their second fight when realizing Peter is not holding back.
Also Goblin begged because he could use Raimi Peter's connection to Norman against him to fake him out with the glider blades. If he didn't, then Peter would've delivered the same beatdown on him that MCU Peter did.
