- 10,234
- 11,689
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not too sure if this is worth calculating, but it could be something.
Not too sure if this is worth calculating, but it could be something.
Undertaker also survives this explosion.
I wonder if this will give any good results as well.
Is bending/splitting steel ladders anything calc worthy?
Weren't we calculating the force needed to break that part of the wall instead of the explosion?We already looked at this one a while back, would be nowhere near upgrade potential
It was the force of getting run over the way Taker was, and the explosion can’t be very high since it’s evidently smaller than both the explosion that killed Vince and the Undertaker Coffin explosion, both of which are not upgrade-worthy feats by the standards of todayWeren't we calculating the force needed to break that part of the wall instead of the explosion?
Sadly true.It was the force of getting run over the way Taker was, and the explosion can’t be very high since it’s evidently smaller than both the explosion that killed Vince and the Undertaker Coffin explosion, both of which are not upgrade-worthy feats by the standards of today
How does Chris Jericho vs Gon Freecss sound?
There was Gon vs TheoryDidn't we already do a Gon vs wrestler match before?
How strong are people from The Boys?I'm realizing that the WWE wrestlers are now in range to fight characters from the boys
I WANNA MAKE A-TRAIN GO THROUGH HULKAMANIA. and it's funny to make black noir fight a ******* WWE superstar
There's a multi-layered joke in here.A-TRAIN GO THROUGH HULKAMANIA.
There has to.There's a multi-layered joke in here.
@CuteAnimeNekoGirl99How strong are people from The Boys?
But are those viable feats to use in versus battles?We have long acknowledged that due to the “Everyone fights Everyone” nature of WWE we form our scaling off of the general “average” of their fights, rather than any given one. Even though the power levels between God and Top Tiers is slim, the unique nature of WWE as a verse means that consistent showings in a certain bracket are required, as opposed to the singular instance most verses require for feats such as defeating someone with a higher AP than your current rating
Alright. That makes sense.On some levels yes and on others no. You can use it to argue for skill or to prove x character has faced y fighting style, but to say “X character held their own against Y character, but can’t/usually doesn’t win” is just listing off their place in the scaling chain, and doesn’t particularly do anything at all. Valid? Yes. Useful? No.
Having experience in having that disadvantage means you're gonna have to adapt and find your way around said disadvantage, so I don't fully agree with this.For LS, absolutely not. They are in the LS tier they are in, and comparing them to those superior gives off the idea they’re at a higher rating than they actually are. The best you can do is argue experience in having that disadvantage, which is a very, VERY small number of an advantage that doesn’t exactly work wonders
My take on it is unless a character has some form of notoriety for working their way around a certain disadvantage (e.g. Little Mac) I rarely consider it anything more than a rather minor influence in that particular field. I’d rather have an advantage in something than be in a disadvantage, but have experience in dealing with said disadvantageHaving experience in having that disadvantage means you're gonna have to adapt and find your way around said disadvantage, so I don't fully agree with this
That makes sense, but having disadvantages in speed, LS, AP, and more is a pretty common thing in the verse, even for people who aren't very notorious for working their way around disadvantages.My take on it is unless a character has some form of notoriety for working their way around a certain disadvantage (e.g. Little Mac) I rarely consider it anything more than a rather minor influence in that particular field. I’d rather have an advantage in something than be in a disadvantage, but have experience in dealing with said disadvantage
I think you’re getting Speed confused with Agilityspeed
Confusion over what exactly?What I'm trying to convey is that Top Tiers have defeated God Tiers on a few occasions for many different reasons, and I feel like it's something that needs to be addressed to avoid confusion.
I can argue it's a combination of both tbh.I think you’re getting Speed confused with Agility
It's WWE. People get confused over how this verse works all the time.Confusion over what exactly?
Honestly, I think drawing comparisons between Superstars of different levels on the scaling chain causes more confusion than it solves. An outsider would think they directly scale, because in any other verse, they wouldIt's WWE. People get confused over how this verse works all the time.
I think it's more so the way I explain the feats makes it seem like they're on the same level.Honestly, I think drawing comparisons between Superstars of different levels on the scaling chain causes more confusion than it solves. An outsider would think they directly scale, because in any other verse, they would
Nah in most verses “holding your own” implies some kind of link in AP scaling, which isn’t the case here. Each level of the scaling chain has their own individual calculations and featsI think it's more so the way I explain the feats makes it seem like they're on the same level.
We should probably specify from now on that when Top Tiers "fight on par" with God Tiers, it's more so of them holding their own against them than fighting on par.
"Holding your own" and "Fighting on par" have different meanings imo.Nah in most verses “holding your own” implies some kind of link in AP scaling, which isn’t the case here. Each level of the scaling chain has their own individual calculations and feats