- 153
- 19
how will dracula kill this version?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AE requires the specific interaction. It's why Warhammer Daemons are such a pain in the dick to effect.Dracula can interact with Alucard, because he can interact with Death, who also has Abstract Existence.
Uhhh, since before I can remember?@DaReaperMan since when was that a thing? Affecting type 1 abstracts gives you the ability to affect type 1 abstracts.
also it’s simple, Dracula exists and Alucard just gets yeetus deletus.
Didn't know about that, thought it was a general thing. But it really is on the page. So Dracula can't interact with Alucard? Even with the 4D stuff?Uhhh, since before I can remember?
"Beware that the abstract nature of different characters can stem from different sources (rumors, concepts, possibilities,...), as such, being able to affect a subtype of a category does not mean a character can affect all types of abstraction." ~ Abstract Existence page
Uhhh, it's actually brought up a lot of the time. You probably don't deal with versus threads that deal with AE1 beyond the conceptual variety often.Not really implemented in any other vs debate when it comes to who affects abstracts last time I checked.
either way Dracula can affect concepts and has 4-D range and hax potency, Alucard isn’t doing shit against Drac’s literal existence ******* him over
Prove Dracula can specifically effect the abstraction of thoughts. If you can, put that on his profile.@DaReaperMan so he’s an even shittier type 1 abstract if he’s based on his mind, which Dracula can affect easily, good to know.
Well, that's interesting.DaReaper would be correct it, unless Dracula can effect the abstraction of thoughts then he can't effect Alucard in any meaningful way.
Interaction with concepts =/= Interaction with thoughts. You need feats of effecting that abstraction in particular, being able to effect concepts is irrelevant.
Synonym=/=The same thing. This is basic shit.@DaReaperMan Yeah thoughts, you mean the thing that’s also synonymous with concept? And again, I’d like to see Alucard avoiding stuff that’s higher dimensional in nature.
First of all, drop the antagonistic tone there. Secondly I never said that Alucard resisted higher D hax, all I did was provide further clarification upon Alucard's AE and what it's based on.oh sure if Alucard can resist higher dimensional hax that he has no answer to, I’d like to see some proof he’s able to avoid hax that is 4-D in range and potency.
"one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning in some or all senses"@DaReaperMan Merriam Webster’s own dictionary would like to say otherwise.
@LordGinSama Literally what part of my text is antagonistic? I’m literally asking you for proof that he can avoid higher dimensional hax since you keep saying Dracula can’t affect him.
That’s not how you use the phrase but whatever. Alucard gets screwed the moment the fight starts so he loses.
Glass don't make comments like this whenever you yourself haven't even read what you've linked.@DaReaperMan Merriam Webster’s own dictionary would like to say otherwise.
Your asking me for proof for something whenever I never made that claim to begin with? I'm addressing the argument of Dracula's interaction with Death allowing him to effect a different type of AE, not if Dracula can effect Alucard with 4-D hax.Literally what part of my text is antagonistic? I’m literally asking you for proof that he can avoid higher dimensional hax since you keep saying Dracula can’t affect him.
Wasn't using a phrase but whatever.That’s not how you use the phrase but whatever.
Practice what you preach Glass. Definition is directly in your face, yet for some odd reason that being an ulterior motive most likely you only highlighted one part of the definition as opposed to the whole.one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning in some or all senses
Maybe read the first part as well before you jump the gun that it doesn’t mean they have the same meaning.
I've read the profile, and again stop ******* hyperfocusing on one aspect. Context matters? I was obviously referring to the discussion of Dracula's NPI effecting Alucard's form of AE.you literally said Dracula cannot affect Alucard in any meaningful way, maybe double check what Dracula has in the first place before you make claims like thisZ
I have a doubt. Even with Alucard's specific AE, can Dracula affect alucard with the superior D hax?Again I never once said Alucard has a counter to Dracula's higher D manipulation, the discussion was about if Dracula can effect Alucard's form of AE using his interaction with Death as a basis. Doesn't take a genius to put things together Glass.
4-D hax would affect Alucard just as any 3-D character.I have a doubt. Even with Alucard's specific AE, can Dracula affect alucard with the superior D hax?
Could you tell me?
I'm new to these things.
Hey Glass, guess what. You're hyperfocused on the wrong part of the definition. The relationship between Thoughts and Concepts are the ladder part of the definition objectively unless you can say that, to a tee, Concepts and thoughts are the same exact things. Which they aren't.one of two or more words or expressions of the same language that have the same or nearly the same meaning in some or all senses
Maybe read the first part as well before you jump the gun that it doesn’t mean they have the same meaning.
@DaReaperMan you mean the thing that’s been accepted for a long time on the wiki now about how endless and infinite are treated? That job’s already done for me since DMC uses those statements in spade so yeah.