- 16,959
- 4,855
After a few days of celebrating New Years and everything, this suddenly just occured to me and I knew I had to make a post about it when I had the chance.
Shouldnt all Pokemon (More Specifically Legendaries) who are equal to each other in every way possible, such as Lugia/Ho-oh, Groudon/Kyogre, Darkrai/Cresselia, Latias/Latios, Reshiram/Zekrom, Xerneas/Yveltal, Dialga/Palkia, as well as pokemon species who have a long related history of rivalry and fighting amongst each other, like Zangoose/Seviper, have strong resistance to each others hax abilities? And im not talking about just type advantage wise but overall hax wise.
After all, these 2 opposing groups of Pokemon who are canonically rivals amongst another are supposed to be completely equal and in some cases, both of these groups fight each other in mid-battle, like Groudon/Kyogre and Dialga/Palkia, and not one is deemed the winner every time, That should strongly imply or even outright prove that the hax abilities of the rival Pokemon do not work against the other. Otherwise, if this wasnt the case, then for examples:
All of the legendaries and species mentioned here have fought each other numerous times in the ancient past, one never getting a victory over the other. So I figured that if they can never beat each other, after unleashing their very best, then their haxes shouldnt be a big deal to both sides either. Otherwise, these numerous encounters wouldnt be "numerous" now would they?
NOTE: This would ONLY apply to pokemon (species and legendary wise) who are consistently refered to as equals amongst each other. Pokemon who have fought each other multiple times but not to the degree of being widely known as rivals for the longest period of time should not be given the same treatment.
Are there any issues/complains about this proposal or does this look reasonable?
Shouldnt all Pokemon (More Specifically Legendaries) who are equal to each other in every way possible, such as Lugia/Ho-oh, Groudon/Kyogre, Darkrai/Cresselia, Latias/Latios, Reshiram/Zekrom, Xerneas/Yveltal, Dialga/Palkia, as well as pokemon species who have a long related history of rivalry and fighting amongst each other, like Zangoose/Seviper, have strong resistance to each others hax abilities? And im not talking about just type advantage wise but overall hax wise.
After all, these 2 opposing groups of Pokemon who are canonically rivals amongst another are supposed to be completely equal and in some cases, both of these groups fight each other in mid-battle, like Groudon/Kyogre and Dialga/Palkia, and not one is deemed the winner every time, That should strongly imply or even outright prove that the hax abilities of the rival Pokemon do not work against the other. Otherwise, if this wasnt the case, then for examples:
- Groudon would be easy fodder against Kyogre, who has a type advantage.
- Ho-oh, a fire pokemon, wouldnt be capable of beating Lugia, who is deemed "Guardian of the Sea". Futhermore, Lugia with its psychic hax would have gotten the edge over Ho-Oh to increase its chances of beating it as well.
- Landourus wouldnt be needed to stop the fighting between Thundurus and Tornadus as one has a type advantage (Thundurus) over the other (Tornadus) and should easily be able to win during their struggles.
- Cresselia would literally have no possible way of countering Darkrai's powers due to one being Dark and the other Psychic.
All of the legendaries and species mentioned here have fought each other numerous times in the ancient past, one never getting a victory over the other. So I figured that if they can never beat each other, after unleashing their very best, then their haxes shouldnt be a big deal to both sides either. Otherwise, these numerous encounters wouldnt be "numerous" now would they?
NOTE: This would ONLY apply to pokemon (species and legendary wise) who are consistently refered to as equals amongst each other. Pokemon who have fought each other multiple times but not to the degree of being widely known as rivals for the longest period of time should not be given the same treatment.
Are there any issues/complains about this proposal or does this look reasonable?