- 8,153
- 2,177
Where does Executor say "I agree with type 1 AE"? I don't see that anywhere in this thread. He merely states he thinks they should have some form of AE because of what they are but never a type.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't mean those members will immediately respond. I've already contacted a bunch of staff for a separate revision thread, but only like one has responded so far. We're not going with no Type AE 1 just because you alone object to Type 1 AE and to us already having more people agreeing to it. There's no good reason for entitlement here.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:Executor thinks they should have some form of AE but he never says he agrees with type 1, if you read over his post.
So what you need to do is contact more staff such as Ultima and etc.
Having more people agreeing than disagreeing is not enough to guarantee that the ability is gonna get added and vice-versa. Because people can be biased.Dragopentling said:Doesn't mean those members will immediately respond. I've already contacted a bunch of staff for a separate revision thread, but only like one has responded so far. We're not going with no Type AE 1 just because you alone object to Type 1 AE and to us already having more people agreeing to it. There's no good reason for entitlement here.
It is relevant when this is a voting based system unless electing a president is also appeal to popularity. Voting isn't an argument either, it's a consensus. It's not fallacious if there isn't an argument being made because I didn't remotely claim it was true because the majority believes it. All I said was that more people agreed with it.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:Number of people is irrelevant.
This I would counter by the fact that Dialga and Palkia are normally described as Beings of Time and Space and them being the Time/Space of the World, which shows that their True Form is not simply incorporeal but directly tied to the very Abstract Concepts that they embody, and thus affecting them would require affecting the Abstractions.PlozAlcachaz said:Some people were saying their non-physical depictions are just Non-Corporeality.