• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The real cal howard said:
The point was completely missed on what I was saying.

If we have a choice between unknown and not unknown, definitely go with the latter. Going any higher than planet level severely highballs a character who hasn't shown anything close until she becomes God with a capital G.
I don't really get what position you're advocating for, since you're really talking around the issue.

Do you want the current tiering to stay exactly as is (which includes "Far higher", going above planet level which you don't agree with), or should it stay the same except have an "Unknown" put in front of it (which has "unknown" which you don't agree with)?
 
I should probably leave my side too:

I think just "Unknown" is the best. Anything including "At least" is definitely wrong, since they logically wouldn't be in that tier anymore without adding some ultra downplay. I remember mentioning an example of 'any unknown 3-D character would be "at least 10-C", to point this out. I also remember people calling it an extreme example, but in this case, I'm pretty sure that doesn't apply given, well, look at those jumps. It's okay to say we just don't know how strong a character is.
 
There's also more consistency in that given Dark Samus's file.

I agree with Unknown as well
 
SomebodyData said:
I should probably leave my side too:
I think just "Unknown" is the best. Anything including "At least" is definitely wrong, since they logically wouldn't be in that tier anymore without adding some ultra downplay. I remember mentioning an example of 'any unknown 3-D character would be "at least 10-C", to point this out. I also remember people calling it an extreme example, but in this case, I'm pretty sure that doesn't apply given, well, look at those jumps. It's okay to say we just don't know how strong a character is.
How would this notion affect profiles that have similar natures to these PMMM characters?

Would they also be Unknown as well?
 
Schnee One said:
I think so in all honesty
Funny thing, IIRC, we used the 5-B lowball because Reinhard being 3-A from the multiplier was deemed an outlier.

How times have changed, huh?
 
I thought about that too, since we have another 3A feat I think all of them should be 3A

But anyway, we're derailing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top