- 14,399
- 4,484
- Thread starter
- #41
So, does a "possibly Building Level" rating sound good enough because of how big the explosion is?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Peters and Ernies Durability Revision
- Thread starter Psychomaster35
- Start date
- Status
- 14,575
- 5,876
Ernie's profile is alright. It doesn't mention this feat. Peter's profile is unlocked. I'm gonna edit that part because they don't even survive the fall out of the rocket.
No, there's no 8-C calc justifying the change. Peter and Ernie, along with the rest of the verse, should stay the same.
No, there's no 8-C calc justifying the change. Peter and Ernie, along with the rest of the verse, should stay the same.
- 14,399
- 4,484
- Thread starter
- #44
"Possibly higher" rating should be good then, no?
- 14,575
- 5,876
The feat can't be considered. It's an outlier no matter what. It has been discussed before and there's no support for the feat to be legit.
- 14,399
- 4,484
- Thread starter
- #46
Very well. This is considered to be an outlier then. Please close this. I was just curious anyways if this was legit or not.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
