Peppa Pig Revision

[Mariogoods]

Daddy Pig's weakness:​

In Season 1; Episode 9; "Daddy Loses His Glasses", Daddy Pig is shown his high dependence on his glasses to properly see things. (It is unknown if he has myopia) It should be considered as an weakness. (But his glasses is durable enough to withstand his weight)

For Daddy Pig current weakness, I'm not sure if it should be kept since we have hosted many characters who are not good at fighting.

Removing "Others" section in both profiles:​

Since the profiles are not intended to be in "inappropriate way", the profiles have been determined to keep before. However, I have heard that picking them to fight others is "inappropriate way" and I'm uncertain about this. Therefore, this revision appears as a suggestion for everyone to discuss.

Disclaimer: The revisions above do not mean that I support the censorship of contents in Peppa Pig.

 

[Vizer04]

I agree

 

[XXKINGXX69]

Agree

 

[Antvasima]

The new weakness seems fine to me.

I am not sure about removing their fight results sections though.

 

[FinePoint]

Since when do we not count matches for children's cartoon characters?
Is there further context I'm missing?

 

[Bobsican]

I mean, unlike with Barney, there's no grey area as to what they'd be able to do in a match out of a lack of feats, aka, we can safely assume that they'd just try to get close to the opponent and go physical, as we do with Thomas the Tank Engine.

Anyways, neutral on the rest.

 

[Antvasima]

I suppose that their fight sections can probably remain then.

 

[Mariogoods]

I suppose that their fight sections can probably remain then.

I agree too. Since the new weakness is uncontroversial and has been agreed, I personally think that the new weakness can be applied.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, that seems fine to me.

 

[Apex_Predator_GX]

I didn't knew this verse was a thing in the wiki.

So Peppa is like Tier 2 via Toon Force or something?

 

[Bobsican]

Nah, another tier 9 with nothing to speak of beyond that.

 

[Apex_Predator_GX]

I agree with this thread

 

[Mariogoods]

I didn't knew this verse was a thing in the wiki.

So Peppa is like Tier 2 via Toon Force or something?

Nope. Peppa Pig characters are not good TF users.

 

[RandomGuy2345]

Peppa Pig had pages???

 

[Antvasima]

Can somebody remind me what our rules say about these types of characters please?

 

[Bobsican]

As it was covered here, pages from preschool media are overall allowed so long they're indexed in an appropiate manner, the issue is when their contents aren't serious or fitting for our purposes in a manner it'd fit better in Joke Battles Wiki, aka, they're written in a joking manner.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay, but what do our editing rules page say about it?

 

[Bobsican]

This

 

[Antvasima]

Never mind. I checked:

"Preferably avoid adding character profiles that may be inappropriate or perceived to be in poor taste. This may include characters, weapons, etcetera, that are ill-suited for a statistics-indexing wiki, due to having no reliable feats, or ones from media which may be too controversial or otherwise unnecessary to be featured. This includes pages that would strictly be written as a joke, and as such more suitably belong in the Joke Battles wiki. Although we do feature some franchises with mature content, those that are primarily focused on, or are only composed of, excessive levels of sexual content will not be featured here, and the pages have to be kept clean, without erotic images. For further information, please read our Acceptable content rating scale."

"Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing, they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them."

 

[Mariogoods]

Never mind. I checked:

"Preferably avoid adding character profiles that may be inappropriate or perceived to be in poor taste. This may include characters, weapons, etcetera, that are ill-suited for a statistics-indexing wiki, due to having no reliable feats, or ones from media which may be too controversial or otherwise unnecessary to be featured. This includes pages that would strictly be written as a joke, and as such more suitably belong in the Joke Battles wiki. Although we do feature some franchises with mature content, those that are primarily focused on, or are only composed of, excessive levels of sexual content will not be featured here, and the pages have to be kept clean, without erotic images. For further information, please read our Acceptable content rating scale."

"Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing, they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them."

It seems like the profiles (likely including "Others") can be kept under our rule. And I'll try to find more abilities if I had time.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it seems like a gray area at least.

 

[Mariogoods]

Well, it seems like a gray area at least.

Then it is better to leave the others section as the current state.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Should I close this thread then?

 

[Mariogoods]

Okay. Should I close this thread then?

Ok.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will do so then.