• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

One Punch Man Cosmology Massive upgrade

Hellformer said:
I think instead of separating God's Dimension we can go with this:
Universe: Low 2-C
Multiverse: 2-A
Hyperspace which holds all the Multiverse:
2-A, Possibly Low 1-C

The reason why I think this is the case because we aren't sure if God resides outside the Space which holds the Multiverse. In conclusion we go with God residing somewhere in this Hyperspace.
Click to expand...
Tecnically the multiverse is an infinitely expanding 2B and the space containing it is 2A. As for god dimension you can give it an "unknown" tiering for now, but it is at least L2C, L1C is a possibility but no one gets L1C with just a pair of stataments.
 
Berga14 said:
Tecnically the multiverse is an infinitely expanding 2B and the space containing it is 2A. As for god dimension you can give it an "unknown" tiering for now, but it is at least L2C, L1C is a possibility but no one gets L1C with just a pair of stataments.
Click to expand...
Qawsedf said the Multiverse is 2-A
 
TiltedFN said:
Okay, but how exactly is that 5D? It can be 5D, but it can't be low 1-C because there is literally nothing special about that space, there's no statements of it being infinite in the 5th axis. We don't give out low 1-C for characters that can destroy multiple universes, or low 1-C cosmology for verses that have an established multiverse. Its literally the standards, or every verse would be low 1-C that has at least two low 2-C constructs. So is gods dimension the place where void was or not?
Click to expand...
The idea is that the GOD dimension treats size, distance, and energy in a way that even the ever-expanding universe, with its countless divergent realities emerging from each choice or event, as irrelevant and minuscule in comparison. And in opm, causality is sometimes interchangeable with time, so this dimension can be viewed as transcending time (4D) as well and it is called a higher dimension that even Blast, with his ability to travel all dimensions couldn't access. Also what the **** is the difference between 5D and low 1-C
 
Worthless said:
The idea is that the GOD dimension treats size, distance, and energy in a way that even the ever-expanding universe, with its countless divergent realities emerging from each choice or event, as irrelevant and minuscule in comparison. And in opm, causality is sometimes interchangeable with time, so this dimension can be viewed as transcending time (4D) as well and it is called a higher dimension that even Blast, with his ability to travel all dimensions couldn't access. Also what the **** is the difference between 5D and low 1-C
Click to expand...
The difference between 5D and low 1-C is that low 1-C means you are destroying a construct in which the 5th axis is infinite in size. Otherwise, its just unquantifiable, thats how we treat it on this site. If theres no statements of it being infinite in the 5th axis, then its just unquantifiable and remains 2-A. Otherwise every space would be low 1-C.
 
TiltedFN said:
The difference between 5D and low 1-C is that low 1-C means you are destroying a construct in which the 5th axis is infinite in size. Otherwise, its just unquantifiable, thats how we treat it on this site. If theres no statements of it being infinite in the 5th axis, then its just unquantifiable and remains 2-A. Otherwise every space would be low 1-C.
Click to expand...
Nobody is really saying that they are low 1-C in AP, but rather that the GOD dimension itself is low 1C. A higher-dimensional space that encompasses a universe branching off infinitely while simultaneously treating it as insignificant seems straightforward to me.
 
Worthless said:
Nobody is really saying that they are low 1-C in AP, but rather that the GOD dimension itself is low 1C. A higher-dimensional space that encompasses a universe branching off infinitely while simultaneously treating it as insignificant seems straightforward to me.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying god is low 1-C, I'm saying via our standards, gods dimensions does not fill the requirements to be considered low 1-C, not even a possibly. Its why all 2-A spaces aren't low 1-C.
 
Worthless said:
Nobody is really saying that they are low 1-C in AP, but rather that the GOD dimension itself is low 1C. A higher-dimensional space that encompasses a universe branching off infinitely while simultaneously treating it as insignificant seems straightforward to me.
Click to expand...
Where was stated to encompass the multiverse? (The space where Void goes is probably only the space between universes, not god dimension)
Where was is stated that the multiverse is isignificant? It only says that God's powers can ignore distance etc...
Oh and tecnically the "higher dimension" can be the 4th one not nece necessarily the 5th, i mean, everyone in verse is 3D (except god likely), the statament comes from a 3D character... couldn't God being locked up in a dimension on the 4th axis that is parallel to the multiverse?
Anyway there are way to little information on this metter, i think we shluld drop it and wait for new chapters.
So my opinion:
Multiverse: 2B (infinitely incresing)
Space that contains it: 2A
God dimension: Unknown or at most something like this: At least Low 2C possibly L1C.
 
TiltedFN said:
I'm not saying god is low 1-C, I'm saying via our standards, gods dimensions does not fill the requirements to be considered low 1-C, not even a possibly. Its why all 2-A spaces aren't low 1-C.
Click to expand...
How does what I said not meet the criteria? It's called a higher dimension, which encompasses everything while simultaneously treating them as insignificant and existing beyond the causality of the multiverse.
 
Pretty sure a higher dimension is only considered insignificant if its size is infinitely small, and, as thus, does not warrant a higher tier.

God's dimension is not insignificant in any way, since its size is not infinitely small due to containing infinitely expanding dimensions as folded bubbles within it.
 
Bruh.. i think you choose wrong argument here. In this panel it clearly stated higher dimension and not only that it show a picture of tesseract, it mean 4D space are exist in OPM verse


Because 4D space are exist it clearly mean the entire cosmology are 5D because 4D space and 1D time

And this is not something like a 2C, 2B, or 2A space that being a "higher dimension" just because it contain universes, it not entirely higher D since it not have higher D volume just axis. In OPM, the space clearly stated as 4D, it mean the entirety of that space are 4D by default, it showed tessaract mean it not just 4D in axis but also 4D in volume. So that space are significant

Since this hyperspace encompasses the universes as long as i remember, honestly i see this case as some kind of brane cosmology, where lower space "embeded" in higher space (this space are literally stated as higher space, not just random large space that encompasses some universes)

The hyperspace alone are 4D or low 2C by default and if we added time the hyperspace will be significant 5D space or yeah low 1C
 
Fixxed said:
Bruh.. i think you choose wrong argument here. In this panel it clearly stated higher dimension and not only that it show a picture of tesseract, it mean 4D space are exist in OPM verse


Because 4D space are exist it clearly mean the entire cosmology are 5D because 4D space and 1D time

And this is not something like a 2C, 2B, or 2A space that being a "higher dimension" just because it contain universes, it not entirely higher D since it not have higher D volume just axis. In OPM, the space clearly stated as 4D, it mean the entirety of that space are 4D by default, it showed tessaract mean it not just 4D in axis but also 4D in volume. So that space are significant
Click to expand...

So what you're trying to assert is that the God's dimension is located outside the Hyperspace right? Because you're claiming that God's dimension has 4 spatial axes and 1 temporal axis aka 5-D equivalent structure.
Fixxed said:
Since this hyperspace encompasses the universes as long as i remember, honestly i see this case as some kind of brane cosmology, where lower space "embeded" in higher space (this space are literally stated as higher space, not just random large space that encompasses some universes)
The hyperspace alone are 4D or low 2C by default and if we added time the hyperspace will be significant 5D space or yeah low 1C
Click to expand...
The Hyperspace isn't Low 2-C, instead it's 2-A for holding infinite universes.
 
The idea of Brane cosmology would be OP as hell.
If we do not seperate Hyperspace and God's dimension and instead combine them then I think Low 1-C rating should be solid because of 4 spatial axes and 1 temporal axis
 
TiltedFN said:
The difference between 5D and low 1-C is that low 1-C means you are destroying a construct in which the 5th axis is infinite in size. Otherwise, its just unquantifiable, thats how we treat it on this site. If theres no statements of it being infinite in the 5th axis, then its just unquantifiable and remains 2-A. Otherwise every space would be low 1-C.
Click to expand...
dragon ball didn't have that but it was still accepted as Low 1-C
 
Robo432343 said:
dragon ball didn't have that but it was still accepted as Low 1-C
Click to expand...
Db got it via a perpendicular higher time axis, a time axis or timeline is considerate infinite/being able to contain an uncontable infinite amount of lower dimensional snapshot by defoult unless shown otherwise
 
Berga14 said:
Db got it via a perpendicular higher time axis, a time axis or timeline is considerate infinite/being able to contain an uncontable infinite amount of lower dimensional snapshot by defoult unless shown otherwise
Click to expand...
so we didn't need proof of Db's space being infinite but we need proof of OPM's space being infinite
320187215_529727325748100_3537831684232216296_n.jpg
 
Robo432343 said:
so we didn't need proof of Db's space being infinite but we need proof of OPM's space being infinite
320187215_529727325748100_3537831684232216296_n.jpg
Click to expand...
with time axis scaling you need to prove perpendicularity.
Just to make it clear but every spacetime 4D works in the same way, you just use the same logic but with an additional D. This is not only for db even thought very few verse are using this kind of scaling, otherwise there would be some more L1C verses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Shadow_x007x
  • Locked
One-Punch Man: Saitama's normal punch
Replies
39
Views
2K
Shadow_x007x
Shadow_x007x
DemonicDude
  • Locked
One-Punch Man verse (Visual Update 2024)
Replies
21
Views
2K
DemonicDude
DemonicDude
LIFE_OF_KING
Minor addition for Saitama
Replies
18
Views
3K
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
Kachon123
  • Locked
One-Punch Man: AP Revisions
5 6 7
Replies
262
Views
14K
Kachon123
Kachon123
Emerald
One-Punch Man: It's Borosing time
Replies
22
Views
1K
Detective_Blizzard
Detective_Blizzard
Back
Top