@Deceived3596 There are a few issues with relying on the statement in general;
Oh, so you replied to Deceived instead of, you know, me? I am the foundation of the argument.
1) It is a dubiously canon statement in the first place as it is given by a character breaking the 4th wall in a poll... This isn't a manga statement, a databook statement, an anime statement or even an interview with the author. For something that would be the root of scaling for dozens of characters, the very origin of it makes it unreliable.
It is not. It's a volume statement, written by Oda, likely more reliable than a Databook - geez, probably more than the acclaimed Vivre Card which are not written by this man.
This is not even a point of contention.
As I pointed out, this is hypocritical, you already consented to the validity of the statement and it's origin,
it was you who suggested it in the first place, Damage. Is it too much to ask for you to have debating morals and don't change goalposts as they are inconvenient to you? This isn't a point, next.
2) It is a character-given statement.
It is not.
Your interpretation requires this version of Nami be the one physically taken out of the One Piece Universe from a random chapter and put into this 4th wall higher dimensional situation just to relay information. That is not just absurdity, more on that later, but also contradicted by the fact Nami's claim
includes techniques she has never seen in her entire life in the Manga.
"Oh then the validity is no more due to Nami's ignorance-", you approved the authority and knowledge of Nami in your OP, Damage.
Debating Morals, have them, I plead you. No, this 4th wall Nami has
literally knowledge privileged to the author, like knowing Sanji and Zoro will eventually showcase future techniques. This isn't a character, it's just a sockpuppet for Oda.
3) It is arbitrary to apply the statement to a situational technique like the Golden Rifle which doesn't represent Luffy's true strength anyway. If you were to be generous with the statement you could even interpret it as Nami saying that CP9's Shigan is even more powerful than Enel's Deathpiea and therefore the CP9 members should be Island level. Even if we accepted the statement as being canon and reliable, it is even more assumptive to think that Nami is only comparing Shigan and the Golden Rifle in terms of the amount of joules of energy they have, and ignoring other techniques like Enel's island-busting.
Using techniques literally not ranked in the poll and saying Shigan is stronger than them is No Limits Fallacy and thus the wiki's own standards clown on this point by itself. Enel's deathpea isn't ranked,
there is no reason to assume Nami would be including an unranked technique rather than just applying her statement to the ranked techniques
which is the lower end interpretation, which we prioritize. So no, this point is just objectively indefensible, too bad for you.
It is not arbitrary to apply to Golden Rifle, whether or not it represents Luffy's true strength is
irrelevant to how the techniques are ranked.
It is far simpler just not to rely on the statement which came from a magazine poll...
Damage, who the hell suggested the damn poll to be used in this very thread? Was it me? No, it was you, stop backpedaling.
I await for your fourth point, because these three are just plain wrong.