• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Omnipresence in speed equalized matches

@Fate Well its probably because she was already affecting the multiverse before becoming omnipresent (Not to mention even AoC at its peak [Which is still below UM] would have been able to destroy the entirity of the multiverse)

@Kal speaking of which, when is Heaven being a higher plane to even the multiverse brought up in a match? Feel like that kinda changes a lot of things.
 
Wokistan said:
I mean, I think everyone agrees that omnipresents don't lose their subsidiary benefits at least.
@Wokistan ^ Hence why I said I'm not sure where the matter in this thread is coming from. lol
 
In Madokami matches? I think that it's always brought up that she is in a higher plane.

We are derailing btw
 
Not sure if everyone got my point, but I'm mostly talking about "Any finite speed vs Omnipresent" cases, where people may restrict said Omnipresence via speed equalization, in order to make a match fair, which IMO is not really different from restricting powers.
 
Not really, as we've agreed that omnipresents keep the benefits that aren't blitzing. Speed equalization's always been the exception to that anyways.
 
Wokistan said:
Not really, as we've agreed that omnipresents keep the benefits that aren't blitzing. Speed equalization's always been the exception to that anyways.
Well, I've encountered numerous individuals who think otherwise. But yeah, this makes sense, I think.

So should this thread be closed?
 
Back
Top