- 1,503
- 463
It wouldn't change a thing if u disagreed. Just saying though but whateverI disagree lol.
Back to my original proposition, since 2 staffs disagree with this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It wouldn't change a thing if u disagreed. Just saying though but whateverI disagree lol.
Back to my original proposition, since 2 staffs disagree with this.
Blud thinks his opinion mattersI disagree lol.
Back to my original proposition, since 2 staffs disagree with this.
We did not deny anything. Same pieces of evidence = same arguments = same rejection.Nah its old arguments better explaining
@Milly_Rocking_Bandit also gave instances but you guys denied them flat
I have seen other non dual threads
That accept type 2 which results in the same way we trying to get ours
HmmWe did not deny anything. Same pieces of evidence = same arguments = same rejection.
Not sure why should this change my stance overall. I am not going to repeat my points over a previous rejected proposal
Blud think he is right.Blud thinks his opinion matters
And how do u know he is not right ?Blud think he is right.
There are already two staff that evaluated your threads, what are you waiting for?waiting for a staff that actually read the thread quote my arguments and tell me his refute or acceptance
Till then all the other arguments doesn't seem plausible
They have yet to respond to op refutation. Why are you jumping to conclusions. So you are just going to blindly believe anyone that is a staff because they said so ?There are already two staff that evaluated your threads, what are you waiting for?
Duh, tell that to any staffs that has been arguing against me for literal year. And don't you fu_cking dare put words in my mouth.They have yet to respond to op refutation. Why are you jumping to conclusions. So you are just going to blindly believe anyone that is a staff because they said so ?
Why are u being so aggressive ? You use too many vulgar words you know that right ?Duh, tell that to any staffs that has been arguing against me for literal year. And don't you fu_cking dare put words in my mouth.
I have my own interpretation, and that aligns with their own. And I already altered some of the wiki standard with months long discussion, and a lot of staff contributions.
48 hours after the thread open is a grace as by our rules.
So, shut your mouth.
Please calm down, your comment is unnecessarily aggressive.Duh, tell that to any staffs that has been arguing against me for literal year. And don't you fu_cking dare put words in my mouth.
I have my own interpretation, and that aligns with their own. And I already altered some of the wiki standard with months long discussion, and a lot of staff contributions.
48 hours after the thread open is a grace as by our rules.
So, shut your mouth.
Tabling off nep don't worryDisagree for Nep2
Neutral for Td2
Ergen verse has vastly more pieces of evidence to back it up than a single statement, tho. If you check the thread it was accepted, there are numerous quotes helping its case. It didn't get TD2 (or whatever it is now) just because Yin-Yang exist or is mentioned once.Ergen verse was accepted as so recently (don't mind this claim i don't want to use this as basis to get to aspect type 2 unless you want to downgrade the verse)
According to dao Chinese this was the instance
that yin and yang does serve as general term do all dual systems
Still isn't contradicting this thread.Ergen verse has vastly more pieces of evidence to back it up than a single statement, tho. If you check the thread it was accepted, there are numerous quotes helping its case. It didn't get TD2 (or whatever it is now) just because Yin-Yang exist or is mentioned once.
Tabling off nep don't worry
So u won't considere @DarkDragonMedeus @Dereck03 answer?Am waiting for a serious mod to read the op
link isnt working btw
Link not working
I mean the what codeccl saidLink not working
I wont.So u won't considere @DarkDragonMedeus @Dereck03 answer?
Code
Code
Saying he should've made this thread after telling me he doesn't want to deal with it is kinda funny but eh
Or u have option to pause this/close this if u think there's no more room.It seems theres no more room for rimuru WN to get stronger?
@DarkDragonMedeus This is report worthy? practically in our faces they are saying that they will not take our opinion/vote as valid, for the excuse that we always agree with everyone else. And that they are waiting for "serious mods" for evaluation.I wont.
Although its true they are mods and admins
They tend to agree with everyone else
I want an admin to directly quote the op and say their refute.
Because i don't see how this thread is a problem after directly mentioning several admins once agreed with ND2 by having more than 1 or several dualities that affects all of reality
Okay, reading the thread I see nothing but simple ND Type 1, only those 2 spirits light and darkness are the dualities that are given to notice by the scans, there is no proof that the rest of his creation is treated as a duality nor referring to how light and darkness are treated.
And for NEP2, I don't even know what the argument is, it makes no sense, disagree.
That's not the only way to get nep 2, but even with the other ways this thread doesn't qualify.
And to make my instance clearer (due to the new changes in TD) this is just ND Nature 1, Aspect 1.
Despite the fact that i've already made my instance pretty clear and you agreeing with me?That's worse then. Since there isn't a qualitive superiority that is needed now for Transduality aka Nature 2.
Lol? Ying and Yang does not represent all dual systems, it is just the best known example of what a duality would look like, Ying and Yang, two sides of the same coin, opposition. What we have here are literally 2 dualities, light and darkness, the rest of what you say are dualities actually has no proof that the verse treats them as such, it does not even have proof that they have a similar nature to light & darkness. And no, being created by a duality does not make everything a duality.
I think what he really meant was he is waiting for other staff opinion. It may seem likee he is rude or something but you are misunderstanding. He will still take your votes seriously. Also you are allowed to disagree with staff I don't see a problem here@DarkDragonMedeus This is report worthy? practically in our faces they are saying that they will not take our opinion/vote as valid, for the excuse that we always agree with everyone else. And that they are waiting for "serious mods" for evaluation.
Despite the fact that i've already made my instance pretty clear and you agreeing with me?
We literally already gave warning to user for Disregarding staff votes
I dont see he say like thatI think what he really meant was he is waiting for other staff opinion. It may seem likee he is rude or something but you are misunderstanding something. He will still take your votes seriously. Also you are allowed to disagree with staff I don't see a problem here
I wont.
Although its true they are mods and admins
They tend to agree with everyone else
I want an admin to directly quote the op and say their refute.
Because i don't see how this thread is a problem after directly mentioning several admins once agreed with ND2 by having more than 1 or several dualities that affects all of reality
I dont see he say like that
@TWILIGHT-OP say to him, "so you won't consider dereck and dark vote" and he say he won't
His explanation also indicate he dont want staff that "agree with everyone else" he WANT staff that "directly quote the op and say their refute"
So i dont see from his statement he take dereck and dark vote seriously. He just want other staff opinion that MUST AGREE with this thread
He is not looking for staffs to agree with him. Sure it might be a mistake he did but he didn't really meant it like that after all we are human beings we all make mistakes most of the time.
Not all staff members have all the time in the world to read every single thread they are in; I'm positive Antvasima especially relates to this. And on paper, simply having skepticism isn't a violation, staff input is still valid even if they're simply agreeing with someone who stated their reasons and trying to discriminate is quite disrespectful yes.@DarkDragonMedeus This is report worthy? practically in our faces they are saying that they will not take our opinion/vote as valid, for the excuse that we always agree with everyone else. And that they are waiting for "serious mods" for evaluation.
Your vote is counted.@DarkDragonMedeus This is report worthy? practically in our faces they are saying that they will not take our opinion/vote as valid, for the excuse that we always agree with everyone else. And that they are waiting for "serious mods" for evaluation.
Despite the fact that i've already made my instance pretty clear and you agreeing with me?
We literally already gave warning to user for Disregarding staff votes
Not all staff members have all the time in the world to read every single thread they are in; I'm positive Antvasima especially relates to this. And on paper, simply having skepticism isn't a violation, staff input is still valid even if they're simply agreeing with someone who stated their reasons and trying to discriminate is quite disrespectful yes.
I just said i apologized for that and you're making it sound more rude, i only said i wont take it valid because my thread wasn't read. That's all i didn't say they lack competence how come you twist it Like that???It's understandable that you may have disagreements with them, which is a common occurrence.
However, the problem in your post arose from an accusation that the staff members lacked competence simply because they disagreed with your thread, according to your interpretation.
While not report-worthy, it was perceived as rude and disrespectful since you were discriminating against someone for having a different opinion than yours.
You want it to be mentioned 30 times within the story for it to be accepted as yin and Yang?Ergen verse has vastly more pieces of evidence to back it up than a single statement.
Exactly my point.You want it to be mentioned 30 times within the story for it to be accepted as yin and Yang?