-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
NEP nature type 2 and transduality
- Thread starter NIK_FARIS
- Start date
- 13,816
- 3,795
Yes
- 1,255
- 591
- Thread starter
- #5
The description of NEP nature type 2 is transdual nonexistent in which they have some kind of low level transdual. This is why I ask if those with Transduality can affect them since NEP nature type 2 is a weak version of transdual.
- 13,816
- 3,795
If you mean interaction, yes
- 1,255
- 591
- Thread starter
- #8
I know that there are acausual negatation like Oryx or Gabriel so I thought there would also be someone with transdual negatation.
- 438
- 181
oh ok then
- 3,687
- 2,060
Need more proof, are the TD 2 is also transcend exist and nonexist???
Because in many case in fiction even in philosophy, exist and nonexist is not explained as duality. Duality is only about all thing that exist like cool-hot, good-bad, water-fire......
- 1,255
- 591
- Thread starter
- #12
I guess it depend on how the verse interpret it. Usually Chinese philosophy include form and void, real and unreal etc. We usually treat dual system to also include existence and nonexistent unless it proof otherwise. Like, duality of existence which mean duality which tie to existence only.
- 3,687
- 2,060
I mean if is only stated "all duality" we can't include exist and nonexist to it. It will NLF
Like "Conceptless NEP" is just only treated as NEP 1 if no further explanation, it can get NEP 2 if include concept of nothingness/nonexistance
So i whould says it depend to proof you give
- 1,255
- 591
- Thread starter
- #14
Eh, I mean sure if the verse never mention nonexistent throughout the series and bring character which transcend duality of the world, we can doubt it. But if it mention somewhere in shape or form in the verse, and said character transcend all duality of the world, then I see no reason why we should doubt it. There no reason to explicit mention the duality with existence and nonexistent every single time unless the verse heavily contradicts it.(That would be poor writing)
Example, would be like Hecatia or Junko. There are mentioning of existence and nonexistent within the verse and as such it Transduality scope also would include it.
Example, would be like Hecatia or Junko. There are mentioning of existence and nonexistent within the verse and as such it Transduality scope also would include it.
Last edited:
- 13,816
- 3,795
Type 2 transduality would already include NEP2, otherwise you are basically saying the verse doesn't have existence, which is just what. Same with acausality, you would have to assume the verse doesn't have causality for it to not be included in the dualities, which I have never seen in any verse whatsoever.
Similar threads
