• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
It's tertiary canon
It can be used when there's existing showings in the primary canon
For example, if we see a blizzard in the manga and the novel tells us that the blizzard is AZ temperatures, it can be used
But there's no such thing like that in the manga (or anime)
It may be minor but it's a whole new ability from thin air
I got novel canon>anime canon but that's a convo for another day
 
I assumed the four Hokage weren't affected because their bodies consisted of White Zetsu, similar to how Yamato fell under the genjutsu once he came out of White Zets
This is probable, yeah
Except for the small matter of Orochimaru having a white zetsu body and still getting affected
 
I got novel canon>anime canon but that's a convo for another day
how do you even reconcile the novel being canon over the anime. Like I can understand if people are against the anime being canon... but the novel? ..Which adapts the movie, that is explicitly retconned within the manga continuity?? Not only that but showcasing feats and abilities and fights that just NEVER happened in ANY of the adaptations?
 
how do you even reconcile the novel being canon over the anime. Like I can understand if people are against the anime being canon... but the novel? ..Which adapts the movie, that is explicitly retconned within the manga continuity?? Not only that but showcasing feats and abilities and fights that just NEVER happened in ANY of the adaptations?
Well I start of with believing the anime isn't canon cuz of the multiple discrepancies and because I don't trust studio pierrot at all.

I follow with acknowledging the novels are canon to the manga cus if this

Therefore Manga>=ln>anime

 
I get Nierre's point and don't really mind decanonizing the novel currently. But like....the anime has jougan. It has so far, never appeared in anything other than just the anime. So it isn't exactly cut and dry imo. But it is kinda obvious that the author is probably willing to bring things from the anime to the manga more so than from the movie novel that has no relevance at this point in the story. So the anime does feel more canon than the novel.
 
Well I start of with believing the anime isn't canon cuz of the multiple discrepancies and because I don't trust studio pierrot at all.
dw i dont really care about whether the anime is canon or not my confusion is moreso the novel + yeah sp sucks
Well I start of with believing the anime isn't canon cuz of the multiple discrepancies and because I don't trust studio pierrot at all.

I follow with acknowledging the novels are canon to the manga cus if this

Therefore Manga>=ln>anime


do you have the link to the actual website
 
dw i dont really care about whether the anime is canon or not my confusion is moreso the novel + yeah sp sucks

do you have the link to the actual website
 
So how exactly do you reconcile the movie/novel being different from the manga arc. Like what exactly do you take from the movie/ln and what do you disregard
 
So how exactly do you reconcile the movie/novel being different from the manga arc. Like what exactly do you take from the movie/ln and what do you disregard
I know you didn't ask me, but I wanna say that we should keep things from the novels that have also appeared in the other iterations to gain more context about them. But things that are only in the movie or novel is kinda hard, because they might not be contradictory themselves, but they don't appear anywhere else. So it becomes hard to argue that the author did have those things in his vision when they never appear again.
 
So how exactly do you reconcile the movie/novel being different from the manga arc. Like what exactly do you take from the movie/ln and what do you disregard
Is fused Momoshiki's design shown anywhere in the novel? I think the novel of the movie is canon to the manga, not the movie itself.

Also I think there's an argument to be made that things can occur off panel, but its a pretty weak argument lol.
 
Also I think there's an argument to be made that things can occur off panel, but its a pretty weak argument lol.
I think that could be valid, depends on what it is ofc
Is fused Momoshiki's design shown anywhere in the novel?
The novel describes the fused transformation being monstrous/grotesque iirc, so it's definitely the movie version that the novel adapts.
I think the novel of the movie is canon to the manga, not the movie itself.
The screenshot you posted lists the movie as part of the timeline
 
Has it even been seen since the Nue arc? I don’t watch the anime. Only read.
It was in the Urashiki arc but that arc is............


it was shown against momoshiki in the anime, and it also was shown in the last episode but that was definitely just to tease.
 
I'm pretty sure it's the LN of the movie not the movie itself

The text in yellow (in the original screenshot you posted), says "Boruto Naruto The Movie (A formidable enemy attacks the Chunin Exams)" translated via google.

There's no reference to the novel at all. That photo is the poster for the movie, it's not indicative of the novel.
 
Back
Top