-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
My Little Pony: Upgrade to the High Tiers
- Thread starter Lightbuster30
- Start date
- Status
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #82
Well, speaking in a manner of personal opinion (Said opinion is based on how we treat 2-C in the first place): If you can get to 2-C from a Low 2-C that's literally on the edge of Low 2-C (At least Low 2-Cs can get 2-C if they double in power based on what I've read), then the inverse should also be true. Can't imagine any reason why it wouldn't be.
- 15,717
- 7,699
I shared similar thoughts.
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #85
Well, there we are, acceptance from one of the staff you wanted to check this out. Is this good to go through then?
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #87
Actually come to think of it, would just an outright Low 2-C be better with no at least? At least is for Low 2-Cs that are at the halfway point, and the Elements are definitely more than twice as strong, but also not strong enough to outright stomp with no ability to resist based on the document. My mindset was actually that they'd be below the halfway point, albeit close. At least a few times weaker than the 2-Cs, but still relative.
I figured being relative to a 2-C made them immensely far into Low 2-C, hence why I suggested an at least rating. I didn't realize how at least was treated in tier 2 until after making the thread.
Last edited:
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #89
Well, I personally think no at least would be a more accurate route.
- 568
- 536
But I thought At least meant it was stronger than normal?
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #92
In the case of tier 2, "At least Low 2-C" means you're halfway to 2-C. Meaning just about any character would be stronger than the Elements of Harmony or the Pony of Shadows if they doubled their power, even if double power still isn't enough to beat them depending on which character it is.
- 568
- 536
Hm, ok then
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #96
Well, when you put it like that I guess that makes sense. When I read "at least" characters can jump the next tier if they double their power, I concluded that all "at least" characters were half 2-C.
Last edited:
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #97
In any case, the edits are done, tier categories included for once.
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 6,005
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #100
If it's allowed then I don't care if it's re-added. But someone else would have to do it. Having to re-add the wording after removing it just kills the mood to add it back.
- 568
- 536
I can probably add it back (if that annoying glitch I kept experiencing doesn’t happen again lol)
- 568
- 536
Unfortunately the glitch did happen again for some pages (grrr) but I was still able to re-add At least to the necessary pages, so I guess this can be closed now if I’m not mistaken.
- 6,590
- 1,700
- Thread starter
- #103
In response to yesterday's question: The thread is good to close now. I wanted to keep it open since others had questions of their own in regards to tier 4 and didn't want to close the thread early. But that has since been resolved.
- Status
