- 6,227
- 6,501
Speaking of which, didn't he say he was gonna make that thread yesterday or something?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Speaking of which, didn't he say he was gonna make that thread yesterday or something?
What thread? The one about Star and Stripe's feat was already made and is being discussed right now.Speaking of which, didn't he say he was gonna make that thread yesterday or something?
I really don't like the phrase "travel speed=/= combat speed" its pretty clear the gap isn't supposed to be thousands of times and it's just a bad attempt at trying to cover inconsistencies and bad scaling.That's not what calc stacking means.
Izuku's speed comes from his in canon speed of being faster than sound, not because I calculated his speed to being that fast from a different scene.
Izuku's Blackwhip was moving and Lady Nagant shot it quickly.
Method 1 assumes she shot it the same time it began to leave the smoke. Method 2 assumes she fired at some unknown time after she saw his decoy move. While Method 3 is the anime version which shows she didn't fire until it was already reach the distance I measured, and it was in frozen time.
Also his Blackwhip travel speedcan be slower than his reactions and combat speed. Teactions/combat speed is generally faster than movement/travel speed. Especially in fiction where this can become absurd, since fiction can do whatever the hell it wants.
I admit the confusion of her bullet being faster than his Blackwhip. If you want I can measure the speed that it moves in the anime and use that instead? I guess it can be true that Izuku just isn't shooting Blackwhip out as fast as he can?
Since it's impossible to measure speed in the manga for obvious reasons.
Both versions ar high ends. The calc is pretty easily refutable.What thread? The one about Star and Stripe's feat was already made and is being discussed right now.
Looking like it can be a big downgrade or a slight upgrade for the feat. Depends which version is used.
It seems like more people currently prefer the upgraded version considering it has more staff votes saying it's good in the comments.What thread? The one about Star and Stripe's feat was already made and is being discussed right now.
Looking like it can be a big downgrade or a slight upgrade for the feat. Depends which version is used.
Both versions ar high ends. The calc is pretty easily refutable.
I welcome your thoughts as long as you're willing to not start trouble and be respectful to people even if they disagree with your opinion.Both versions ar high ends. The calc is pretty easily refutable.
8-A+ and baseline Hypersonic ratings for All Might level characters.
Figures. The upgraded one paint a more "3 dimensional" picture of the feats since it uses more frames of reference imoIt seems like more people currently prefer the upgraded version considering it has more staff votes saying it's good in the comments.
Extremely consistent with the verse, I fully agree8-A+ and baseline Hypersonic ratings for All Might level characters.
Low-Tiers become 9-C+, with 5% being baseline 9-B with Subsonic speed. 8% level is a little bit higher.
How does that sound?
The dude with the Heatblast prp would be ecstatic i'd imagine8-A+ and baseline Hypersonic ratings for All Might level characters.
Low-Tiers become 9-C+, with 5% being baseline 9-B with Subsonic speed. 8% level is a little bit higher.
How does that sound?
Sounds like a a downplayers wet dream8-A+ and baseline Hypersonic ratings for All Might level characters.
Low-Tiers become 9-C+, with 5% being baseline 9-B with Subsonic speed. 8% level is a little bit higher.
How does that sound?
The way the size values are derived are just sooo senseless. It's hella obvious too.I welcome your thoughts as long as you're willing to not start trouble and be respectful to people even if they disagree with your opinion.
Why do you think they're both wrong?
And Base Deku becomes 10-A since he is just an athletic human.8-A+ and baseline Hypersonic ratings for All Might level characters.
Low-Tiers become 9-C+, with 5% being baseline 9-B with Subsonic speed. 8% level is a little bit higher.
Yeah, those feats are straight up insane no matter how you look at them.Btw even if the Star clap feat gets revised we’ll still have High 6-C due to the Heroes Rising and missile calc
So I don’t see High 6-C going anywhere
We are not trying to inflate results or anything. I suggest for you to realize we're just trying the best we can.Snip
Yeah, those feats are straight up insane no matter how you look at them.
As for the missile, it could give even higher results if I measured the width of the cloud, will take a look.
My bad I accidentally said crater rather than gap lol.We are not trying to inflate results or anything. I suggest for you to realize we're just trying the best we can.
Of course many would like higher numbers but I am personally trying to hold back my bias as best as I can.
I'm having trouble understanding what you're saying though. What is the issue? Can you provide a panel that clearly shows your point?
How would you calculate this feat? If you don't mind I'd like to see your process.
Also what crater are you talking about? There is no crater in this feat. We also do not use five panels either. Do you know we're talking about Star and Stripe's giant clap?
Can you show the panel where Shigaraki is hundreds of meters tall? Or at least tell me what that panel is so I can find it? I do not believe that is correct.Shigaraki is apparently hundred meters tall now it seems.
Aren’t OPM vs MHA matchups generally a bad idea?Would Bakugou vs Platinum Sperm be a good matchup?
Are they? I don't remember any OPM vs MHA thread going to hell on this forum.Aren’t OPM vs MHA matchups generally a bad idea?
Depends, Bakugou vs Genos was pretty decisive on Bakugou's partAren’t OPM vs MHA matchups generally a bad idea?
I meant bad idea in the sense it’s likely a stomp most of the timeAre they? I don't remember any OPM vs MHA thread going to hell on this forum.
These two versus aren't usually in the same tiers for long.
If a fight is an obvious stomp the OP will be told and the thread will be closed. Nothing I'd call as being bad.I meant bad idea in the sense it’s likely a stomp most of the time
My definition of bad is the sense that we won’t get an added matchupIf a fight is an obvious stomp the OP will be told and the thread will be closed. Nothing I'd call as being bad.
I'm not going after the Heroes Rising feat, but will be discussing my thoughts about the missiles feat with Therefir.He would need to get rid of the Heroes Rising feat and the missile feat. Even if the feat dropped to High 7-A.
To be fair we don't know if he's going to go after those next.
Nah man I ain't gonna ever make these pixel calcs on mobile again. Found the weirdest app for it it's so crappy.Can you show the panel where Shigaraki is hundreds of meters tall? Or at least tell me what that panel is so I can find it? I do not believe that is correct.
I do not see how you get below 1 km results in diameter. We don't wait for CRTs to discuss anything, I do not want this discussion on my thread in the future.
It's much better for you to make your points here.
Thank you. Apologies if I come off as rude, please don't hesitate to say so. Also I'll be speaking out of order, I'll highlight when I start talking about another Method.Snip
Finding the height of the clouds from the sea in this shot, and using it here to find the size of the hole as it just happened is much more acceptable. That shot is the instant the hole happened and is obviously meant to show how big and powerful this attack is.
It's far more simple and is pretty clear cut compared to anything else. As such I still prefer this version of the calc.
Then why is the black dot treated as it being shigaraki in the 1 Gigatons calc? It's only him when it benefits your arguments. Clear hypocrisy. And what else is it supposed to be? Curious. It very clearly is supposed to be them its just small and impossible to Make it out. Also the jets aren't visible cause they don't have to be in every panel. Jets flying at supersonic speed can leave the panel completely given that the dispersion radius is about 250m using absolute high ends with the method. So no that's not a counter argument(would be weird too considering these jets should have been completely obliterated by the apparently large island level energy) 10m is also more than just a fair assumption too it's very generous actually.Thank you. Apologies if I come off as rude, please don't hesitate to say so. Also I'll be speaking out of order, I'll highlight when I start talking about another Method.
There are some issue I need to explain. First off in your Second Method, the black dot you see is not the size of Shigaraki or the Nomu, it's just an effect of the clap. Unless you believe Star and Stripe crushed them into a diamond shape. Also I believe you should use the official scans which have a higher quality.
You cannot use that as if it's their size, as it lacks their shape and is clearly a special effects for Star and Stripe's clap. Shigaraki and the Nomu are not visible there and cannot be used for scaling. I hope to convince you of this fact, if you take a close look you'll see that it clearly isn't them.
You also provide no reason why we should believe that black dot is equal to them in size. Since we cannot see them after all. As such we can say they're smaller.
For your Third Method. You cannot see the full size of the hole when Star is preparing her laser, in this panel you're using. So your measurements are incorrect, that is not the diameter as the hole very clearly goes offscreen and likely by a large amount judging by the size shows here.
For your First Method. The hole you're seeing in that panel is smaller than the hole made from her clap, the reason is simple physics. Do you know what Star and Stripe did? She created a massive pressure/shock wave by having her giant clap, this wave blew away everything in the area.
When a large volume of air is dispersed, it creates a vacuum. This vacuum wants to quickly get filled with air, at a noteworthy speed around 365 meters per second, giving it more than enough time for the hole to get smaller between panels. it would take a bit more than a minute to have mostly closed the hole in the sky.
"Why wasn't the hole filled completely then"? You might ask me?
That's simple, the vacuum not only sucks air in from the sides, where the clouds reside, but also from above and below. Needless to say, pushing the clouds enough to create a vacuum would not necessarily mean that it would suck in all those clouds as they were before, since there is plenty of air to take from all directions.
The hole in the clouds is obviously bigger at first and gets much smaller as the vacuum gets filled.
1. Already addressed the jetsIt’s impossible for the diamond shape thing to be Shigaraki for two reasons:
1. The jets, which are much bigger than Shigaraki, are nowhere to be seen in the panel
2. If we scale the cloud-to-sea distance off of the impact if we assume the impact is Shigaraki’s height, we would only get like 30 m clouds off of sea level (which is just wrong)
And the clouds couldn't have risen since then? Clear hypocrisy yet againFinding the height of the clouds from the sea in this shot, and using it here to find the size of the hole as it just happened is much more acceptable. That shot is the instant the hole happened and is obviously meant to show how big and powerful this attack is.
It's far more simple and is pretty clear cut compared to anything else. As such I still prefer this version of the calc.
I refuse to debate with you if you refuse to give me the same respect I showed you.Snip
I am not being offensive right now though nor am I insulting you. I just said your argument was hypocritical with actual evidence to it being hypocritical. If you refuse to argue against me then do so but if you fail to argue against my points with irrefutable logic then why would I consider myself in the wrong. Since the start of this debate you also were simply insisting on your point being true so how are you any better. And again I am not using shigrakis size I am using his size multiplied by 6 which is pretty generous. Even if I assumed it was 100 m in diameter or anything more than that it would still make the results incredibly lower. And it's just one method of many ways to scale this feat which are consistently a tier below the one you use.I refuse to debate with you if you refuse to give me the same respect I showed you.
As this only tells me you refuse to listen to others and will believe you're correct no matter what.
Your method is assuming the dot is the size of the Nomu and Shigaraki, that is the issue with your calc. However there is no question that is where they are in terms of height. Which means the height is usable. This is not me being hypocritical, it's just you refusing my own reasoning.
The KE formula being used already takes into account not all of the mass moves at the same speed and doesn't start from the center. We are not using the standard 0.5*Mass*Velocity^2 method, if we were the results would be inflated. I will not be responding to your post if this is the attitude you're going to have.
I deeply apologize if I offended you, as that is not my intention. But I rather not spread bad feelings between us, I hope you can understand.